Han James E, Lozano Alicia, Hasan Shaakir, Choi J Isabelle, Chhabra Arpit M, Tsai Henry, Mohammed Nasiruddin, Patel Samir, Katz Sanford, Chang John H, Simone Charles B, Press Robert H
Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA.
ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, NJ, USA.
Int J Part Ther. 2022 Jul 6;9(2):40-48. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-22-00003.1. eCollection 2022 Fall.
Reports of proton beam therapy (PBT) utilization for cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck (HN) region is virtually non-existent. This study reports on the efficacy and acute toxicities of PBT for primary HN cutaneous melanoma.
We queried the prospectively collected, multi-institutional Proton Collaborative Group registry for all consecutive patients with HN cutaneous melanoma receiving PBT from May 2010 to December 2019. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and local regional recurrence free survival (LRFS). Toxicity was reported per CTCAE version 4.0.
A total of 8 patients were identified with a median age of 69 (range, 37-88). All patients (100%) underwent surgery followed with postoperative PBT. There were 3 patients (37.5%) with T3 or T4 disease and 4 (50%) with N2 or N3 disease. The median radiation dose was 46 GyRBE (range, 27-70) and median dose per fraction was 2.4 GyRBE (range, 2.0-6.0) with the most common dose fractionation being 44 or 48 GyRBE in 20 fractions (n = 4). At a median follow-up of 40.1 months (range, 1.6-62.4) the 1 and 3 year OS rates were 85.7% and 35.7%, respectively. The median PFS was 25.40 months (95% CI, 2.53-58.70) while PFS at 1 year and 3 years was 85.7% and 35.7%, respectively. LRFS was 100% at 1 year and 85.7% at 3 years. Five of the 8 patients developed distant metastases, of which 3 received immunotherapy. Acute G2+ and G3+ toxicities occurred in 5 of 8 patients and 2 of 8 patients, respectively. G3 toxicities included radiation dermatitis (n = 1) and immunotherapy-related rash (n = 1). No G4+ toxicities were reported.
Single modality PBT for HN melanomas in the definitive setting provides effective and durable local control rates with tolerable acute toxicity. Distant failure remains the primary pattern of failure.
关于质子束治疗(PBT)用于头颈部(HN)皮肤黑色素瘤的报道几乎不存在。本研究报告了PBT治疗原发性HN皮肤黑色素瘤的疗效和急性毒性。
我们查询了前瞻性收集的多机构质子协作组登记处,以获取2010年5月至2019年12月期间所有连续接受PBT治疗的HN皮肤黑色素瘤患者。采用Kaplan-Meier方法估计总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和局部区域无复发生存期(LRFS)。毒性按照CTCAE第4.0版报告。
共确定8例患者,中位年龄69岁(范围37 - 88岁)。所有患者(100%)均接受手术,随后进行术后PBT。有3例(37.5%)患者为T3或T4期疾病,4例(50%)为N2或N3期疾病。中位放射剂量为46 GyRBE(范围27 - 70),中位每次分割剂量为2.4 GyRBE(范围2.0 - 6.0),最常见的剂量分割方案是20次分割给予44或48 GyRBE(n = 4)。中位随访40.1个月(范围1.6 - 62.4),1年和3年的OS率分别为85.7%和35.7%。中位PFS为25.4个月(95%CI,2.53 - 58.70),1年和3年的PFS分别为85.7%和35.7%。1年和3年的LRFS分别为100%和85.7%。8例患者中有5例发生远处转移,其中3例接受了免疫治疗。8例患者中分别有5例和2例发生急性G2 +和G3 +毒性反应。G3毒性反应包括放射性皮炎(n = 1)和免疫治疗相关皮疹(n = 1)。未报告G4 +毒性反应。
在确定性治疗中,单模式PBT治疗HN黑色素瘤可提供有效且持久的局部控制率,急性毒性可耐受。远处失败仍然是主要的失败模式。