Standaert Willem, Muylle Steve, Basu Amit
HEC Liège, Management School of the University of Liège, Rue Louvrex 14, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Vlerick Business School, Belgium.
Bus Horiz. 2022 May-Jun;65(3):267-275. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2021.02.047. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
The COVID-19 pandemic that erupted in 2020 forced businesses across the world to adopt virtual meetings. With many people working from home, software platforms like Zoom and Teams became ubiquitous, but their widespread use also revealed many weaknesses and limitations. While technologies for virtual meetings have existed for decades, these technologies have advanced significantly in recent years, and today range from audioconference facilities to telepresence rooms with high-resolution video and sophisticated virtual presence features. The available alternatives differ significantly in costs, complexity and capabilities, and choosing the most effective technology for each meeting setting is not always easy. This is important, since after the pandemic, virtual meetings will move from being a necessity brought on by the pandemic to being a widely accepted alternative to traditional face-to-face meetings. Consequently, the questions of when and how to meet virtually will become even more significant. In this article, we describe a decision-making framework for choosing when and how to meet virtually, based on matching the appropriate communication capabilities with various meeting objectives and taking into account meeting size and duration. The framework is based on extensive empirical research conducted in partnership with several major U.S. and European companies.
2020年爆发的新冠疫情迫使全球企业采用虚拟会议形式。由于许多人居家办公,Zoom和Teams等软件平台变得无处不在,但它们的广泛使用也暴露出许多弱点和局限性。虽然虚拟会议技术已经存在了几十年,但近年来这些技术有了显著进步,如今涵盖了从音频会议设施到具备高分辨率视频和复杂虚拟出席功能的远程会议室等多种形式。现有的替代方案在成本、复杂性和功能方面差异很大,为每个会议场景选择最有效的技术并非总是易事。这一点很重要,因为疫情过后,虚拟会议将从疫情带来的一种必要形式转变为被广泛接受的传统面对面会议的替代方式。因此,何时以及如何进行虚拟会议的问题将变得更加重要。在本文中,我们基于将适当的沟通能力与各种会议目标相匹配,并考虑会议规模和时长,描述了一个关于选择何时以及如何进行虚拟会议的决策框架。该框架基于与几家美国和欧洲大公司合作开展的广泛实证研究。