Seidel Lea Jasmin, Daniels Judith K, Ostafin Brian D
Department of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2023 Jan;36(1):67-82. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2022.2113993. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Meaning in life may function as a protective factor in the context of potentially traumatic experiences, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. We investigated the associations between meaning and psychological distress (i.e., depression, anxiety, COVID-19-related PTSD) prospectively and cross-sectionally. We hypothesized that meaning inversely predicts peri-pandemic distress and that meaning moderates the association between being negatively affected by the pandemic and distress. We additionally explored cross-sectional associations between meaning subcomponents and distress and a meaning violations perspective.
Undergraduate students (= 109) completed questionnaires before (October 2019 to March 2020; meaning, anxiety) and during the pandemic (April to June 2020; meaning, meaning subcomponents, depression, anxiety, PTSD).
Correcting for family-wise errors, meaning prospectively predicted less depression and anxiety, but not PTSD. Correcting for family-wise errors, peri-pandemic meaning was consistently related with peri-pandemic distress. Meaning did not moderate the link between being affected by the pandemic and distress. The meaning subcomponent comprehension was most strongly related with distress and a meaning violations perspective was partly supported.
Meaning emerged as a significant correlate of peri-pandemic distress. Current findings should be replicated longitudinally and experimentally to establish their robustness and to examine the causal influence of meaning on distress.
背景/目的:在诸如新冠疫情这类潜在创伤性经历的背景下,生活意义可能起到保护作用。我们前瞻性和横断面地研究了生活意义与心理困扰(即抑郁、焦虑、与新冠疫情相关的创伤后应激障碍)之间的关联。我们假设生活意义能反向预测疫情期间的困扰,且生活意义会调节受疫情负面影响与困扰之间的关联。我们还探讨了生活意义子成分与困扰之间的横断面关联以及意义违背视角。
109名本科生在疫情前(2019年10月至2020年3月;生活意义、焦虑)和疫情期间(2020年4月至6月;生活意义、生活意义子成分、抑郁、焦虑、创伤后应激障碍)完成了问卷调查。
校正家族性错误后,生活意义前瞻性地预测了更少的抑郁和焦虑,但未预测创伤后应激障碍。校正家族性错误后,疫情期间的生活意义与疫情期间的困扰始终相关。生活意义并未调节受疫情影响与困扰之间的联系。生活意义子成分理解与困扰的相关性最强,意义违背视角得到了部分支持。
生活意义成为疫情期间困扰的一个显著相关因素。当前研究结果应通过纵向和实验性研究进行重复验证,以确定其稳健性,并检验生活意义对困扰的因果影响。