• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内部和共享 RapidPlan 模型在前列腺放射治疗计划中的比较。

A comparison of in-house and shared RapidPlan models for prostate radiation therapy planning.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

Institute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Phys Eng Sci Med. 2022 Dec;45(4):1029-1041. doi: 10.1007/s13246-022-01151-1. Epub 2022 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1007/s13246-022-01151-1
PMID:36063348
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9747821/
Abstract

Knowledge-based planning (KBP) can increase plan quality, consistency and efficiency. In this study, we assess the success of a using a publicly available KBP model compared with developing an in-house model for prostate cancer radiotherapy using a single, commercially available treatment planning system based on the ability of the model to achieve the centre's planning goals. Two radiation oncology centres each created a prostate cancer KBP model using the Eclipse RapidPlan software. These two models and a third publicly-available, shared model were tested at three centres in a retrospective planning study. The publicly-available model achieved lower rectum doses than the other two models. However, the planning-target-volume (PTV) doses did not meet the local planning goals and the model could not be adjusted to correct this. As a result, the plans most likely to satisfy local planning goals and requirements were created using an in-house model. For centres without an existing in-house model, a model created by another centre with similar planning goals was found to be preferred. Variations in local planning practices including contouring, treatment technique and planning goals can influence the relative performance of KBP. The value of publicly available KBP models could be enhanced through standardisation of planning goals and contouring guidelines, providing information related to the planning goals used to create the model and increased flexibility to allow local adaptation of the KBP model.

摘要

基于知识的计划(KBP)可以提高计划的质量、一致性和效率。在这项研究中,我们评估了使用公开可用的 KBP 模型的成功,与使用单一的、商业化的治疗计划系统开发内部模型相比,该模型基于模型实现中心计划目标的能力。两个肿瘤放疗中心都使用 Eclipse RapidPlan 软件创建了前列腺癌 KBP 模型。这两个模型和第三个公开可用的共享模型在三个中心进行了回顾性计划研究。公开可用的模型实现的直肠剂量低于其他两个模型。然而,计划靶区(PTV)剂量不符合当地的计划目标,并且模型无法调整以纠正这一点。因此,使用内部模型创建了最有可能满足当地计划目标和要求的计划。对于没有现有内部模型的中心,发现使用具有相似计划目标的另一个中心创建的模型是首选的。当地规划实践的差异,包括轮廓、治疗技术和规划目标,会影响 KBP 的相对性能。通过标准化规划目标和轮廓指南、提供与创建模型使用的规划目标相关的信息以及增加灵活性以允许 KBP 模型的本地调整,可以提高公开可用的 KBP 模型的价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ad7/9747821/fdcb13d73775/13246_2022_1151_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ad7/9747821/fed2fb7ad4b1/13246_2022_1151_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ad7/9747821/59a0180046f3/13246_2022_1151_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ad7/9747821/1714f0597471/13246_2022_1151_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ad7/9747821/fdcb13d73775/13246_2022_1151_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ad7/9747821/fed2fb7ad4b1/13246_2022_1151_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ad7/9747821/59a0180046f3/13246_2022_1151_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ad7/9747821/1714f0597471/13246_2022_1151_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ad7/9747821/fdcb13d73775/13246_2022_1151_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparison of in-house and shared RapidPlan models for prostate radiation therapy planning.内部和共享 RapidPlan 模型在前列腺放射治疗计划中的比较。
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2022 Dec;45(4):1029-1041. doi: 10.1007/s13246-022-01151-1. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
2
Dosimetric and planning efficiency comparison for lung SBRT: CyberKnife vs VMAT vs knowledge-based VMAT.肺部立体定向体部放疗的剂量学与计划效率比较:射波刀与容积调强放疗对比基于知识的容积调强放疗
Med Dosim. 2020;45(4):346-351. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
3
Clinical validation and benchmarking of knowledge-based IMRT and VMAT treatment planning in pelvic anatomy.盆腔解剖中基于知识的调强放射治疗(IMRT)和容积旋转调强放疗(VMAT)治疗计划的临床验证与基准测试
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Sep;120(3):473-479. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.06.022. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
4
Can the Student Outperform the Master? A Plan Comparison Between Pinnacle Auto-Planning and Eclipse knowledge-Based RapidPlan Following a Prostate-Bed Plan Competition.学生能否超越老师?在前列腺床计划竞赛后,对 Pinnacle Auto-Planning 和 Eclipse 基于知识的 RapidPlan 的计划比较。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan-Dec;18:1533033819851763. doi: 10.1177/1533033819851763.
5
Impact of database quality in knowledge-based treatment planning for prostate cancer.基于数据库质量对前列腺癌知识治疗计划的影响。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018 Nov-Dec;8(6):437-444. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
6
Is it possible for knowledge-based planning to improve intensity modulated radiation therapy plan quality for planners with different planning experiences in left-sided breast cancer patients?基于知识的计划能否提高不同计划经验的计划者对左侧乳腺癌患者进行调强放射治疗的计划质量?
Radiat Oncol. 2017 May 22;12(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0822-z.
7
Assessment of specific versus combined purpose knowledge based models in prostate radiotherapy.前列腺放疗中基于特定目的与综合目的知识模型的评估
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Nov;19(6):209-216. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12483. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
8
Evaluation of multiple institutions' models for knowledge-based planning of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer.多机构基于知识的前列腺癌容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)计划模型评估。
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Mar 20;13(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-0994-1.
9
Knowledge-based model building for treatment planning for prostate cancer using commercial treatment planning quality assurance software tools.使用商业治疗计划质量保证软件工具进行前列腺癌治疗计划的基于知识的模型构建。
Radiol Phys Technol. 2024 Mar;17(1):337-345. doi: 10.1007/s12194-023-00759-6. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
10
Intercenter validation of a knowledge based model for automated planning of volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer. The experience of the German RapidPlan Consortium.基于知识的前列腺癌容积调强弧形放疗自动计划模型的多中心验证。德国快速计划联盟的经验。
PLoS One. 2017 May 22;12(5):e0178034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178034. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge-Based RapidPlan Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Model in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.基于知识的鼻咽癌容积调强弧形治疗模型
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2025 Jan 13;10(5):101716. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2025.101716. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Validating knowledge-based volumetric modulated arc therapy plans with a multi-institution model (broad model) using a complete open-loop dataset for prostate cancer.使用针对前列腺癌的完整开环数据集,通过多机构模型(广义模型)验证基于知识的容积调强弧形治疗计划。
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2025 Mar;48(1):195-205. doi: 10.1007/s13246-024-01505-x. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
3
Synthesizing Efficiency Tools in Radiotherapy to Increase Patient Flow: A Comprehensive Literature Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a multicentre automated model to reduce planning variability in radiotherapy of prostate cancer.开发一种多中心自动化模型以减少前列腺癌放射治疗中的计划变异性。
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019 Aug 8;11:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2019.07.005. eCollection 2019 Jul.
2
Reducing inter- and intra-planner variability in radiotherapy plan output with a commercial knowledge-based planning solution.利用商业化的基于知识的计划解决方案,减少放疗计划输出中的计划者间和计划内变异性。
Phys Med. 2018 Sep;53:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.08.016. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
3
Evaluation of multiple institutions' models for knowledge-based planning of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer.
综合放疗中的效率工具以增加患者流量:一项全面的文献综述。
Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2024 Dec 13;18:11795549241303606. doi: 10.1177/11795549241303606. eCollection 2024.
4
Evaluation of knowledge-based planning models for male pelvic CBCT-based online adaptive radiotherapy on conventional linear accelerators.基于知识的计划模型在常规线性加速器上基于男性骨盆 CBCT 的在线自适应放射治疗中的评估。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Sep;25(9):e14464. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14464. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
多机构基于知识的前列腺癌容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)计划模型评估。
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Mar 20;13(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-0994-1.
4
Dosimetric comparison of RapidPlan and manually optimized plans in volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer.容积调强弧形放疗中RapidPlan与手动优化计划用于前列腺癌的剂量学比较
Phys Med. 2017 Dec;44:199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.06.026. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
5
Intercenter validation of a knowledge based model for automated planning of volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer. The experience of the German RapidPlan Consortium.基于知识的前列腺癌容积调强弧形放疗自动计划模型的多中心验证。德国快速计划联盟的经验。
PLoS One. 2017 May 22;12(5):e0178034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178034. eCollection 2017.
6
RapidPlan head and neck model: the objectives and possible clinical benefit.快速计划头颈模型:目标及可能的临床益处。
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Apr 27;12(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0808-x.
7
An analysis of knowledge-based planning for stereotactic body radiation therapy of the spine.基于知识的脊柱立体定向体部放射治疗计划分析。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Sep-Oct;7(5):e355-e360. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.02.007. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
8
Clinical validation and benchmarking of knowledge-based IMRT and VMAT treatment planning in pelvic anatomy.盆腔解剖中基于知识的调强放射治疗(IMRT)和容积旋转调强放疗(VMAT)治疗计划的临床验证与基准测试
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Sep;120(3):473-479. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.06.022. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
9
Comparison of Planning Quality and Efficiency Between Conventional and Knowledge-based Algorithms in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients Using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy.基于知识的算法与传统算法在鼻咽癌患者调强放射治疗中计划质量和效率的比较
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Jul 1;95(3):981-990. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.02.017. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
10
On the pre-clinical validation of a commercial model-based optimisation engine: application to volumetric modulated arc therapy for patients with lung or prostate cancer.基于商业模型的优化引擎的临床前验证:在肺癌或前列腺癌患者容积调强弧形放疗中的应用
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Dec;113(3):385-91. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.11.009. Epub 2014 Nov 21.