Department of Kinesiology and Sport Sciences, School of Education & Human Development, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33143, USA.
Department of Kinesiology and Sport Sciences, School of Education & Human Development, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33143, USA; Center on Aging, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA.
J Biomech. 2022 Oct;143:111278. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111278. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
Gait analysis is used in research and clinical environments; yet several limitations exist in current methodologies. Markerless systems, utilizing high-speed video and artificial intelligence, eliminate most limitations encountered in marker-, depth-, or inertial sensor-based systems; however, further development is needed to improve their utility and accessibility in practice. Spatiotemporal parameters from 22 young adults were estimated during over-ground gait. Nine parameters were calculated using events determined from force plate information combined with foot segment tracking and from motion of the foot relative to the sacrum using marker-based and markerless tracking. Two-way mixed effects, single measurement, absolute agreement and relative consistency interclass correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman bias and limits of agreement, and Lin's concordance correlations were used to examine the validity of parameters from markerless tracking compared to parameters calculated from gait event methods using force plates and marker-based tracking. Gait speed, stride length, step length, cycle time, and step time from the markerless system all showed strong agreement with the force plate method. Other markerless-determined parameters were not as accurate. Differences in stride width are attributable to inconsistencies in foot segment definitions between models; while differences in stance time, swing time, and double limb support time were influenced by gait event methods. Mean differences in gait parameters were smaller than meaningful clinical differences in Parkinson's disease patients and within ranges of reference values for elderly subjects. Further studies are needed to determine the validity across other patient groups, but results support the continued development of markerless systems for over-ground gait analysis.
步态分析在研究和临床环境中都有应用;然而,目前的方法学存在一些局限性。无标记系统利用高速视频和人工智能,可以消除基于标记、深度或惯性传感器系统中遇到的大多数限制;然而,需要进一步的发展来提高它们在实践中的实用性和可及性。本研究对 22 名年轻成年人的地面步行步态进行了时空参数估计。使用力板信息结合足部跟踪和基于标记和无标记跟踪的足部相对于骶骨的运动确定的事件,计算了九个参数。采用双向混合效应、单次测量、绝对一致性和相对一致性组内相关系数、Bland-Altman 偏差和一致性界限以及 Lin 的一致性相关系数,比较了无标记跟踪参数与基于力板和基于标记跟踪的步态事件方法计算的参数的有效性。无标记系统的步态速度、步长、步长、周期时间和步长时间与力板方法具有很强的一致性。其他无标记确定的参数则不太准确。步幅宽度的差异归因于模型之间足部节段定义的不一致;而支撑时间、摆动时间和双肢支撑时间的差异则受到步态事件方法的影响。步态参数的平均差异小于帕金森病患者的临床有意义差异,也在老年受试者的参考值范围内。需要进一步的研究来确定在其他患者群体中的有效性,但结果支持继续开发用于地面步态分析的无标记系统。