Suppr超能文献

术前钩线和亚甲蓝定位技术对胸腔镜肺结节手术术后住院时间和并发症影响的对比研究。

Comparative study of the effect of preoperative hookwire and methylene blue localization techniques on post-operative hospital stay and complications in thoracoscopic pulmonary nodule surgery.

机构信息

Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, 17 Lujiang Road, Hefei City, 230001, Anhui Province, China.

出版信息

BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Sep 5;22(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02129-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Direct localization of small and deep pulmonary nodules before thoracoscopic surgery using the hookwire or methylene blue techniques has been recently attempted for better surgical outcomes. In this study, we compare the outcomes of the above two techniques.

METHODS

Two hundred and nineteen patients undergoing 135 hookwire and 151 methylene blue techniques in our University Hospital between July 2020 and January 2022 were compared for localization and hospitalization durations, and the complication risk. Other confounders included patients' age, gender, localization position, nodules location, count, diameter, and depth.

RESULTS

After adjustment of all predictors, the methylene blue technique was associated with a significant 0.6-min (parameter estimate (PE) = -0.568, p value = 0.0173) and an 0.7-day shorter localization and hospitalization time (PE = -0.713, p value =  < 0.0001) as compared to using the hookwire technique. The hookwire technique was significantly associated with 5 times the risk of developing a post-localization complication (Adjusted Odds Ratio (Adj OR) = 4.52, 95% CI 1.53-13.33) and 3.6 times the risk of developing a pneumothorax (Adj OR = 3.57, 95% CI 1.1-11.62) as compared to adopting the methylene blue technique.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the hook wire technique, the methylene blue technique offers a shorter procedure and hospitalization stay, as well as a safer post-operative experience.

摘要

背景

在胸腔镜手术前,使用 Hookwire 或亚甲蓝技术直接定位小而深的肺结节,以获得更好的手术效果。本研究比较了这两种技术的结果。

方法

比较 2020 年 7 月至 2022 年 1 月期间在我院接受 135 例 Hookwire 和 151 例亚甲蓝技术的 219 例患者的定位和住院时间,以及并发症风险。其他混杂因素包括患者年龄、性别、定位位置、结节位置、数量、直径和深度。

结果

在调整所有预测因子后,与 Hookwire 技术相比,亚甲蓝技术的定位和住院时间分别显著缩短 0.6 分钟(参数估计(PE)=-0.568,p 值=0.0173)和 0.7 天(PE=-0.713,p 值<0.0001)。与使用 Hookwire 技术相比,Hookwire 技术发生定位后并发症的风险显著增加 5 倍(校正优势比(Adj OR)=4.52,95%可信区间 1.53-13.33),气胸的风险增加 3.6 倍(Adj OR=3.57,95%可信区间 1.1-11.62)。

结论

与 Hookwire 技术相比,亚甲蓝技术具有手术和住院时间更短、术后体验更安全的特点。

相似文献

6
Needle localization of small pulmonary nodules: Lessons learned.肺小结节的经皮穿刺定位:经验教训。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 May;155(5):2140-2147. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.01.007. Epub 2018 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
[Advancements in Research on Preoperative Localization of Pulmonary Nodules].[肺结节术前定位研究进展]
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2025 May 20;28(5):385-390. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2025.101.07.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验