Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, 17 Lujiang Road, Hefei City, 230001, Anhui Province, China.
BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Sep 5;22(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02129-1.
Direct localization of small and deep pulmonary nodules before thoracoscopic surgery using the hookwire or methylene blue techniques has been recently attempted for better surgical outcomes. In this study, we compare the outcomes of the above two techniques.
Two hundred and nineteen patients undergoing 135 hookwire and 151 methylene blue techniques in our University Hospital between July 2020 and January 2022 were compared for localization and hospitalization durations, and the complication risk. Other confounders included patients' age, gender, localization position, nodules location, count, diameter, and depth.
After adjustment of all predictors, the methylene blue technique was associated with a significant 0.6-min (parameter estimate (PE) = -0.568, p value = 0.0173) and an 0.7-day shorter localization and hospitalization time (PE = -0.713, p value = < 0.0001) as compared to using the hookwire technique. The hookwire technique was significantly associated with 5 times the risk of developing a post-localization complication (Adjusted Odds Ratio (Adj OR) = 4.52, 95% CI 1.53-13.33) and 3.6 times the risk of developing a pneumothorax (Adj OR = 3.57, 95% CI 1.1-11.62) as compared to adopting the methylene blue technique.
Compared to the hook wire technique, the methylene blue technique offers a shorter procedure and hospitalization stay, as well as a safer post-operative experience.
在胸腔镜手术前,使用 Hookwire 或亚甲蓝技术直接定位小而深的肺结节,以获得更好的手术效果。本研究比较了这两种技术的结果。
比较 2020 年 7 月至 2022 年 1 月期间在我院接受 135 例 Hookwire 和 151 例亚甲蓝技术的 219 例患者的定位和住院时间,以及并发症风险。其他混杂因素包括患者年龄、性别、定位位置、结节位置、数量、直径和深度。
在调整所有预测因子后,与 Hookwire 技术相比,亚甲蓝技术的定位和住院时间分别显著缩短 0.6 分钟(参数估计(PE)=-0.568,p 值=0.0173)和 0.7 天(PE=-0.713,p 值<0.0001)。与使用 Hookwire 技术相比,Hookwire 技术发生定位后并发症的风险显著增加 5 倍(校正优势比(Adj OR)=4.52,95%可信区间 1.53-13.33),气胸的风险增加 3.6 倍(Adj OR=3.57,95%可信区间 1.1-11.62)。
与 Hookwire 技术相比,亚甲蓝技术具有手术和住院时间更短、术后体验更安全的特点。