• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西圣保罗口咽鳞状细胞癌的预后因素:10 年随访。

Prognostic factors in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in the state of São Paulo, Brazil: 10-year follow-up.

机构信息

Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Departamento de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Nov-Dec;88 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S124-S132. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.07.003
PMID:36064816
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9756074/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To descriptively analyze the epidemiological data, clinical stage, and outcomes of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, and to estimate the influence of clinical stage and treatment type on overall and disease-free survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed epidemiological data from the São Paulo Cancer Center Foundation database relative to patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 in the state of São Paulo. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to assess factors associated with the outcomes. A forward stepwise selection procedure was used. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test.

RESULTS

A total of 8075 individuals with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma were identified. Of these, 86.3% were diagnosed at an advanced stage and 13.7% at an early stage. Only 27.2% of patients were treated surgically, whereas 57.5% were treated medically. Patients undergoing surgery had longer overall survival than those receiving medical treatment in both early- and advanced-stage oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. However, there was no significant difference in disease-free survival between surgical and medical treatment.

CONCLUSION

No significant difference in disease-free survival between medical and surgical treatment suggests similar complete remission rates with both approaches. Patients receiving medical treatment had shorter overall survival, which may be due to complications from chemotherapy and radiotherapy. However, we cannot confirm this relationship based on the data provided by the São Paulo Cancer Center Foundation. Prospective studies are warranted to assess whether the lower overall survival rate in patients receiving medical treatment is secondary to complications from chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2C.

摘要

目的

描述性分析巴西圣保罗州口咽鳞状细胞癌的流行病学数据、临床分期和结局,并评估临床分期和治疗类型对总生存和无病生存的影响。

方法

我们回顾性分析了巴西圣保罗癌症中心基金会数据库中 2004 年至 2014 年期间诊断为口咽鳞状细胞癌的患者的流行病学数据。采用单因素和多因素 Cox 回归分析评估与结局相关的因素。采用向前逐步选择程序。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法估计生存曲线,并采用 Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon 检验进行比较。

结果

共纳入 8075 例口咽鳞状细胞癌患者,其中 86.3%诊断为晚期,13.7%诊断为早期。仅有 27.2%的患者接受手术治疗,而 57.5%接受药物治疗。在早期和晚期口咽鳞状细胞癌中,接受手术治疗的患者总生存时间长于接受药物治疗的患者。然而,手术和药物治疗在无病生存方面无显著差异。

结论

手术和药物治疗在无病生存方面无显著差异,提示两种方法的完全缓解率相似。接受药物治疗的患者总生存时间较短,这可能是由于化疗和放疗的并发症所致。然而,我们不能仅根据圣保罗癌症中心基金会提供的数据来证实这种关系。需要前瞻性研究来评估接受药物治疗的患者总生存率较低是否继发于化疗和放疗的并发症。

证据水平

2C。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83f2/9756074/a172f284b446/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83f2/9756074/7793d4818d83/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83f2/9756074/6df4308d32bf/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83f2/9756074/263e94c2e77d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83f2/9756074/11157b98727c/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83f2/9756074/a172f284b446/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83f2/9756074/7793d4818d83/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83f2/9756074/6df4308d32bf/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83f2/9756074/263e94c2e77d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83f2/9756074/11157b98727c/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83f2/9756074/a172f284b446/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Prognostic factors in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in the state of São Paulo, Brazil: 10-year follow-up.巴西圣保罗口咽鳞状细胞癌的预后因素:10 年随访。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Nov-Dec;88 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S124-S132. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
2
Epidemiology and survival outcomes of lip, oral cavity, and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in a southeast Brazilian population.巴西东南部人群唇、口腔和口咽鳞状细胞癌的流行病学及生存结果
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2022 May 1;27(3):e274-e284. doi: 10.4317/medoral.25147.
3
Evaluation of proposed staging systems for human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.人乳头瘤病毒相关口咽鳞状细胞癌拟用分期系统的评估
Cancer. 2017 May 15;123(10):1768-1777. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30512. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
4
Survival trends of patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer treated at a cancer center in São Paulo, Brazil.巴西圣保罗癌症中心治疗的口腔和口咽癌患者的生存趋势。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2020 Apr 6;75:e1507. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2020/e1507. eCollection 2020.
5
Prognostic value of FDG PET metabolic tumor volume in human papillomavirus-positive stage III and IV oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描代谢肿瘤体积在人乳头瘤病毒阳性的Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期口咽鳞状细胞癌中的预后价值
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Oct;203(4):897-903. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12497.
6
Analysis of prognostic factors in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiotherapy alone or in combination with systemic chemotherapy.单纯放疗或联合全身化疗治疗口咽鳞状细胞癌患者的预后因素分析
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Nov;134(11):1196-204. doi: 10.1001/archotol.134.11.1196.
7
Treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of external auditory canal: A tertiary cancer centre experience.外耳道鳞状细胞癌的治疗:一家三级癌症中心的经验。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2016 Feb;43(1):45-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
8
Radiographic retropharyngeal lymph node involvement in HPV-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma: Patterns of involvement and impact on patient outcomes.HPV 相关口咽癌的影像学咽后淋巴结累及:累及模式及其对患者结局的影响。
Cancer. 2019 May 1;125(9):1536-1546. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31944. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
9
Surgical versus non-surgical management of early stage oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.早期口咽鳞状细胞癌的手术与非手术治疗。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Mar;268(3):437-42. doi: 10.1007/s00405-010-1362-4. Epub 2010 Aug 27.
10
Outcomes of Oral and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Related to Healthcare Coverage: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Brazil.口腔和口咽鳞状细胞癌与医疗保健覆盖相关的结果:巴西的一项回顾性队列研究。
Cancer Invest. 2022 Sep;40(8):680-692. doi: 10.1080/07357907.2022.2092634. Epub 2022 Jun 26.

本文引用的文献

1
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Head and Neck Cancers, Version 1.2022.NCCN 指南®洞察:头颈部癌症,第 1.2022 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022 Mar;20(3):224-234. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0016.
2
Randomized Trial of Radiotherapy Versus Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Long-Term Results of the ORATOR Trial.随机对照试验:放疗对比经口机器人手术治疗口咽鳞癌:ORATOR 试验的长期结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 10;40(8):866-875. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01961. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
3
Current Role of Surgery in the Management of Oropharyngeal Cancer.
手术在口咽癌管理中的当前作用
Front Oncol. 2019 May 24;9:388. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00388. eCollection 2019.
4
Utilization of Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) in patients with Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and its impact on survival and use of chemotherapy.经口机器人手术(TORS)在口咽鳞状细胞癌患者中的应用及其对生存和化疗使用的影响。
Oral Oncol. 2018 Nov;86:75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.06.009. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
5
The Current Role of Salvage Surgery in Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.挽救性手术在复发性头颈部鳞状细胞癌中的当前作用
Cancers (Basel). 2018 Aug 10;10(8):267. doi: 10.3390/cancers10080267.
6
Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: patient selection and special considerations.口咽癌的经口机器人手术:患者选择及特殊考量
Cancer Manag Res. 2018 Apr 20;10:839-846. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S118891. eCollection 2018.
7
Primary surgery versus primary radiation-based treatment for locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer.局部晚期口咽癌的原发手术与基于原发放疗的治疗对比
Laryngoscope. 2018 Jun;128(6):1353-1364. doi: 10.1002/lary.26903. Epub 2017 Oct 8.
8
Oropharyngeal cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines.口咽癌:英国国家多学科指南
J Laryngol Otol. 2016 May;130(S2):S90-S96. doi: 10.1017/S0022215116000505.
9
Oncologic outcomes and patient-reported quality of life in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive transoral robotic surgery versus definitive chemoradiation.接受根治性经口机器人手术与根治性放化疗的口咽鳞状细胞癌患者的肿瘤学结局及患者报告的生活质量
Oral Oncol. 2016 Oct;61:41-6. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
10
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the complications of salvage total laryngectomy.挽救性全喉切除术并发症的系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jan;43(1):42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.05.017. Epub 2016 May 27.