• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何应用建构主义扎根理论方法的一个实际例子:探索护理人员主导的医疗保健过程中的患者体验。

A Practical Example of How to Apply Constructivist Grounded Theory Methodology: Exploring Patient Experiences During Paramedic Led Healthcare.

作者信息

King Robbie, Downer Terri, Lord Bill, Flanagan Belinda, Oprescu Florin

机构信息

Faculty of Heath Sciences, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

School of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Res Nurs Health. 2025 Aug;48(4):508-521. doi: 10.1002/nur.22468. Epub 2025 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1002/nur.22468
PMID:40237286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12217405/
Abstract

Application of qualitative enquiry is necessary to improve the understanding of patient experience during paramedic-led healthcare. Grounded Theory (GT) is acknowledged as a rigorous qualitative methodology useful for exploring social processes present during healthcare, particularly when little existing knowledge or theory exists. Despite wide use of GT in other health disciplines there are few studies that have used this methodology to guide research in paramedicine. This may be due to GT methods appearing complex and disorientating for both novice and experienced researchers. This methodological article provides a practical example of how Kathy Charmaz's "constructivist" approach to grounded theory (GTc) was applied during research that explored how patients experience paramedic-led healthcare during non-conveyance situations. It explains the fundamental tenets required of GTc research and describes how they were employed during the example research. The article aims to demystify the GTc process and improve the rigour of qualitative GTc research in paramedicine and health disciplines. How to apply Constructivist Grounded Theory methodology is described by providing a practical example of research into patient experience. This article informs researchers how to maintain trustworthiness and credibility when applying GTc methodology. This article describes research that explored how patients experience paramedic-led healthcare. The data was generated through individual interviews between the researcher and patients who had recent experiences of ambulance service healthcare that resulted in not being transported to a hospital ED. Patients or the public were not involved in the conceptualisation or research design of this article or the practical example provided.

摘要

应用定性研究对于增进对护理人员主导的医疗保健过程中患者体验的理解是必要的。扎根理论(GT)被认为是一种严谨的定性方法,有助于探索医疗保健过程中存在的社会过程,特别是在现有知识或理论较少的情况下。尽管GT在其他健康学科中广泛应用,但很少有研究使用这种方法来指导护理医学研究。这可能是因为GT方法对于新手和经验丰富的研究人员来说都显得复杂且令人困惑。这篇方法学文章提供了一个实际例子,说明凯西·查马兹的“建构主义”扎根理论方法(GTc)在一项研究中的应用,该研究探讨了患者在非转运情况下如何体验护理人员主导的医疗保健。文章解释了GTc研究所需的基本原理,并描述了在实例研究中它们是如何应用的。本文旨在揭开GTc过程的神秘面纱,提高护理医学和健康学科中定性GTc研究的严谨性。通过提供一个关于患者体验研究的实际例子,描述了如何应用建构主义扎根理论方法。本文告知研究人员在应用GTc方法时如何保持可信度和可靠性。本文描述了一项探索患者如何体验护理人员主导的医疗保健的研究。数据是通过研究人员与近期有过救护车服务医疗保健经历但未被送往医院急诊科的患者之间的个人访谈产生的。患者或公众未参与本文或所提供实际例子的概念化或研究设计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9148/12217405/ad84db87bb8c/NUR-48-508-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9148/12217405/bbf23bfab237/NUR-48-508-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9148/12217405/540225f95d04/NUR-48-508-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9148/12217405/37fe452cec91/NUR-48-508-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9148/12217405/ad84db87bb8c/NUR-48-508-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9148/12217405/bbf23bfab237/NUR-48-508-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9148/12217405/540225f95d04/NUR-48-508-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9148/12217405/37fe452cec91/NUR-48-508-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9148/12217405/ad84db87bb8c/NUR-48-508-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A Practical Example of How to Apply Constructivist Grounded Theory Methodology: Exploring Patient Experiences During Paramedic Led Healthcare.如何应用建构主义扎根理论方法的一个实际例子:探索护理人员主导的医疗保健过程中的患者体验。
Res Nurs Health. 2025 Aug;48(4):508-521. doi: 10.1002/nur.22468. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
4
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
5
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
6
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
9
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
10
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of Early Mobilization in Post-CABG Patients: A Constructivist Grounded Theory Study.冠状动脉搭桥术后患者早期活动的实施:一项建构主义扎根理论研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Aug 30;19:2697-2709. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S537861. eCollection 2025.
2
Weight loss journeys: Exploring social influences and determinants of health in an exploratory rural German intervention.减肥历程:在德国农村进行的一项探索性干预中探究社会影响因素及健康决定因素
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 14;20(8):e0330358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330358. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying the essential elements to inform the development of a research agenda for Paramedicine in Ireland: a Delphi Study.确定爱尔兰急救医学研究议程制定的基本要素:德尔菲研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Aug 9;22(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01188-6.
2
Looking back to inform the future: a review of published paramedicine research.回顾过去,展望未来:已发表的护理研究综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 2;23(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08893-4.
3
The development of community paramedicine; a restricted review.社区医疗服务的发展:一项受限的综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e3547-e3561. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13985. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
4
A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149.质性研究中反思性的实用指南:AMEE指南第149号
Med Teach. 2022 Apr 7:1-11. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287.
5
The relationship between healthcare service provision models and patient experience.医疗服务提供模式与患者体验之间的关系。
J Health Organ Manag. 2021 Dec 24;36(9):1-24. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-06-2021-0242.
6
Constructivist Grounded Theory: characteristics and operational aspects for nursing research.建构主义扎根理论:护理研究的特点和操作方面。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2021 Jul 16;55:e03776. doi: 10.1590/S1980-220X2020051103776. eCollection 2021.
7
Patient experience of non-conveyance following emergency ambulance service response: A scoping review of the literature.患者在紧急救护车服务响应后的非转运体验:文献综述。
Australas Emerg Care. 2021 Sep;24(3):210-223. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
8
Navigating the maze: Qualitative research methodologies and their philosophical foundations.探索迷宫:定性研究方法及其哲学基础。
Radiography (Lond). 2019 Oct;25 Suppl 1:S4-S8. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
9
When the patient is the expert: measuring patient experience and satisfaction with care.当患者成为专家:测量患者对医疗护理的体验和满意度。
Bull World Health Organ. 2019 Aug 1;97(8):563-569. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.225201. Epub 2019 May 28.
10
Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co-design pilot.支持患者和公众参与研究的框架:系统评价与协同设计试点
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):785-801. doi: 10.1111/hex.12888. Epub 2019 Apr 22.