Helbling Marc, Maxwell Rahsaan, Munzert Simon, Traunmüller Richard
Department of Sociology, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Department of Political Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC USA.
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2022;9(1):302. doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01311-4. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
Immigrant non-citizens are often considered less deserving than citizens of welfare and other public services. The logic is that valuable and scarce public resources must be limited somehow, and the club of citizens is one way of drawing a boundary. In this paper, we examine how far that boundary extends, by analyzing the extent to which Germans prioritize citizens over non-citizens for access to life-saving healthcare. We implement a conjoint experiment to elicit preferences in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The data were collected between April 2020 and March 2021, in 23 waves of an online rolling cross-sectional survey with roughly 17,000 respondents. Our main finding is that citizens are viewed as more deserving of healthcare than non-citizen immigrants, a relationship that is sizeable and robust. Our findings have implications for debates about social boundaries and how to allocate resources in Western Europe.
非公民移民往往被认为比公民更不配享有福利和其他公共服务。其逻辑是,宝贵且稀缺的公共资源必须以某种方式加以限制,而公民身份就是划定界限的一种方式。在本文中,我们通过分析德国人在获得救生医疗服务方面将公民置于非公民之上的程度,来考察这条界限延伸到了多远。我们进行了一项联合实验,以在新冠疫情背景下引出偏好。数据收集于2020年4月至2021年3月期间,通过23轮在线滚动横断面调查,约有17000名受访者参与。我们的主要发现是,公民被视为比非公民移民更应得到医疗服务,这种关系相当显著且稳固。我们的研究结果对有关西欧社会界限以及如何分配资源的辩论具有启示意义。