• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与受伤工人开展以患者为导向的研究的注意事项。

Considerations for engaging in patient-oriented research with injured workers.

作者信息

Nagra Gagan, Hung Pam, Peters Meaghan Ray, Guptill Christine, Ezeugwu Victor E, Cooper Lynn, McKeen Beverley, Gross Douglas P

机构信息

Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Health Serv. 2025 Jun 4;5:1589643. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1589643. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/frhs.2025.1589643
PMID:40535202
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12174379/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-oriented research (POR) incorporates patient-identified priorities and lived experiences into research. Despite their central role in return-to-work (RTW) planning, perspectives and priorities of injured workers are under-represented in Occupational Therapy research. Occupational therapists (OTs) play a key role in RTW research and practice, implementing evidence-based plans and patient-centered care, which positions them well to conduct POR.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper is to identify considerations for POR approaches for OTs to engage injured workers in RTW research.

KEY ISSUES

The engagement of injured workers as research partners is not well described or understood in POR. This paper outlines practical considerations for conducting POR with injured workers, addressing challenges such as power imbalances, communication barriers, fears of unemployment, and varying levels of vulnerability. OTs can facilitate knowledge transfer and act as knowledge brokers within the RTW process, leveraging their client-centered practice to lead research that optimally engages injured workers.

CONCLUSION

Conducting POR with injured workers can shed light on their interactions with health, insurance, and compensation systems. POR approaches can highlight strengths and limitations of available services and systems and promote improved collaboration and knowledge translation and exchange. OTs can apply POR in research and practice to bridge this gap.

摘要

背景

以患者为导向的研究(POR)将患者确定的优先事项和生活经历纳入研究。尽管受伤工人在重返工作岗位(RTW)规划中发挥着核心作用,但职业治疗研究中受伤工人的观点和优先事项却未得到充分体现。职业治疗师(OT)在RTW研究和实践中发挥着关键作用,实施基于证据的计划和以患者为中心的护理,这使他们非常适合开展POR。

目的

本文的目的是确定职业治疗师采用POR方法让受伤工人参与RTW研究时应考虑的因素。

关键问题

在POR中,受伤工人作为研究伙伴的参与情况并未得到充分描述或理解。本文概述了与受伤工人进行POR时的实际考虑因素,解决了诸如权力不平衡、沟通障碍、失业恐惧和不同程度的脆弱性等挑战。职业治疗师可以促进知识转移,并在RTW过程中充当知识经纪人,利用他们以客户为中心的实践来引领能让受伤工人最佳参与的研究。

结论

与受伤工人进行POR可以揭示他们与健康、保险和赔偿系统的互动情况。POR方法可以突出现有服务和系统的优势与局限性,并促进更好的合作以及知识转化与交流。职业治疗师可以在研究和实践中应用POR来弥合这一差距。

相似文献

1
Considerations for engaging in patient-oriented research with injured workers.与受伤工人开展以患者为导向的研究的注意事项。
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jun 4;5:1589643. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1589643. eCollection 2025.
2
The ultimate power play in research - partnering with patients, partnering with power.研究中的终极权力博弈——与患者合作,与权力合作。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 17;11(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00745-9.
3
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
4
Engaging Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Research: Qualitative Substudy of Factors Impacting Participation.让社区居住的老年人参与研究:影响参与因素的定性子研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 3;9:e74191. doi: 10.2196/74191.
5
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
An Occupational Science Contribution to Camouflaging Scholarship: Centering Intersectional Experiences of Occupational Disruptions.职业科学对伪装学术的贡献:以职业中断的交叉经历为中心
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):238-248. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0070. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Integrating Antiracism and Life Course Frameworks in Research with Autistic Minority Transition-Aged Youth and Young Adults.在针对少数族裔自闭症过渡年龄青年和年轻人的研究中整合反种族主义和生命历程框架。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):229-237. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0088. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
10
What Matters Most? An Exploration of Quality of Life Through the Everyday Experiences of Autistic Young People and Adults.最重要的是什么?通过自闭症青少年和成年人的日常经历探索生活质量。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):312-323. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0127. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Avoiding Ableist Language: Suggestions for Autism Researchers.避免使用歧视性语言:给自闭症研究者的建议。
Autism Adulthood. 2021 Mar 1;3(1):18-29. doi: 10.1089/aut.2020.0014. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
2
Patient-identified priorities for successful partnerships in patient-oriented research.患者确定的以患者为导向的研究中成功合作的优先事项。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Sep 7;8(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00384-4.
3
Embedding lived experience into mental health academic research organizations: Critical reflections.将生活体验嵌入心理健康学术研究组织:批判性反思。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2299-2305. doi: 10.1111/hex.13586. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
4
Workplace improvements to support safe and sustained return to work: Suggestions from a survey of workers with permanent impairments.改善工作场所以支持安全和持续重返工作岗位:永久性损伤工人调查的建议。
Am J Ind Med. 2021 Sep;64(9):731-743. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23274. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
5
Patients as partners in health research: A scoping review.患者作为健康研究的合作伙伴:范围综述。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1378-1390. doi: 10.1111/hex.13272. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
6
Patient oriented research in mental health: matching laboratory to life and beyond in Canada.加拿大以患者为导向的心理健康研究:让实验室与现实生活相匹配及其他
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Apr 26;7(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00266-1.
7
"We are the stakeholders with the most at stake": scientific and autism community co-researchers reflect on their collaborative experience in the CONNECT project.“我们是利益相关度最高的利益相关者”:科学界与自闭症群体的共同研究者反思他们在“CONNECT项目”中的合作经历。
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Sep 27;6:58. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00233-2. eCollection 2020.
8
Guidelines for conducting research studies with the autism community.与自闭症群体开展研究的指南。
Autism Policy Pract. 2019 Sep 9;2(1 A new beginning):29-45.
9
What Is Missing from "Patient-Oriented Research?" A View from Public Health Systems and Services.“以患者为导向的研究”缺少了什么?来自公共卫生系统与服务的视角。
Healthc Policy. 2019 Nov;15(2):10-19. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2019.26075.
10
Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the 'how' and 'what' of patient engagement in health research.加拿大的患者参与:对健康研究中患者参与的“方式”和“内容”的范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Feb 7;16(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0282-4.