• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Nursing Students' Perception and Attitude towards Objective Structured Clinical Examination in Oman.阿曼护理专业学生对客观结构化临床考试的认知和态度。
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2022 Aug;22(3):343-350. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2.2022.012. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
2
Medical students' perception of objective structured clinical examination: a feedback for process improvement.医学生对客观结构化临床考试的认知:用于改进流程的反馈
J Surg Educ. 2014 Sep-Oct;71(5):701-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.02.010. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
3
Perception of pharmacy students in Malaysia on the use of objective structured clinical examinations to evaluate competence.马来西亚药学专业学生对使用客观结构化临床考试评估能力的看法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Dec 15;71(6):118. doi: 10.5688/aj7106118.
4
How to maintain equity and objectivity in assessing the communication skills in a large group of student nurses during a long examination session, using the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).如何在长时间的考试环节中,运用客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)对一大群实习护士的沟通技巧进行评估时保持公平性和客观性。
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Mar;38:54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.11.034. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
5
'I found the OSCE very stressful': student midwives' attitudes towards an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE).“我发现客观结构化临床考试压力非常大”:助产专业学生对客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)的态度
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Mar;34(3):468-73. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.04.022. Epub 2013 May 15.
6
Objective structured clinical examination vs traditional clinical examination to evaluate students' clinical competence: A systematic review of nursing faculty and students' perceptions and experiences.客观结构化临床考试与传统临床考试评估学生临床能力的比较:护理教师和学生感知与经验的系统评价。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Jan;108:105170. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105170. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
7
An Innovative Evaluation in Fundamental Nursing Curriculum for Novice Nursing Students: An Observational Research.针对新手护生基础护理课程的创新性评估:一项观察性研究。
J Prof Nurs. 2018 Sep-Oct;34(5):412-416. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 May 2.
8
Using Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in undergraduate psychiatric nursing education: is it reliable and valid?在本科精神科护理教育中使用客观结构化临床考试(OSCE):它是否可靠和有效?
Nurse Educ Today. 2012 Apr;32(3):283-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 May 8.
9
Perceptions of academic staff toward the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in clinical nursing: Assessment method.临床护理中对客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)的教职员工认知:评估方法。
Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Aug;193(4):2097-2103. doi: 10.1007/s11845-024-03643-3. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
10
Objective structured clinical examination: Do first-year nursing students perceive it to be stressful?客观结构化临床考试:一年级护理学生是否认为它有压力?
Curationis. 2023 Mar 27;46(1):e1-e7. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v46i1.2339.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the challenges and needs of nursing students in relation to OSCE exam stress: A qualitative study.探索护生在客观结构化临床考试压力方面的挑战与需求:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 14;20(7):e0327898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327898. eCollection 2025.
2
Nurse educators' satisfaction with online Objective Structured Clinical Examination scoring system.护士教育者对在线客观结构化临床考试评分系统的满意度。
3
Objective structured clinical examination: Do first-year nursing students perceive it to be stressful?客观结构化临床考试:一年级护理学生是否认为它有压力?
Curationis. 2023 Mar 27;46(1):e1-e7. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v46i1.2339.

本文引用的文献

1
Dental students' perception of the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE): The Taibah University experience, Almadinah Almunawwarah, KSA.牙科学生对客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)的认知:沙特阿拉伯麦地那泰巴大学的经验
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2017 Nov 21;13(1):64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2017.09.002. eCollection 2018 Feb.
2
Attitudes of undergraduate nursing students toward Objective Structure Practical Examination: An Exploratory study.本科护理专业学生对客观结构化实践考试的态度:一项探索性研究。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2016 Dec 10;4(1):68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2016.12.003. eCollection 2017 Jan 10.
3
The influence of anxiety on student nurse performance in a simulated clinical setting: A mixed methods design.焦虑对护生在模拟临床环境中表现的影响:混合方法设计。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Oct;98:57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
4
Experiences of nursing students and examiners with the Objective Structured Clinical Examination method in physical assessment education: A mixed methods study.护理专业学生和考评员在物理评估教育中对客观结构化临床考试方法的体验:一项混合方法研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 Feb;35:83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
5
Enhancing OSCE preparedness with video exemplars in undergraduate nursing students. A mixed method study.通过视频范例提高本科护生客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)准备水平:一项混合方法研究
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Jul;54:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.02.024. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
6
Using Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) as Education in Advanced Practice Registered Nursing Education.将客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)用于高级实践注册护士教育。
J Prof Nurs. 2017 Mar-Apr;33(2):119-125. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
7
Medical students' perception of objective structured clinical examination: a feedback for process improvement.医学生对客观结构化临床考试的认知:用于改进流程的反馈
J Surg Educ. 2014 Sep-Oct;71(5):701-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.02.010. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
8
Objective structured clinical examination: the assessment of choice.客观结构化临床考试:首选的评估方式。
Oman Med J. 2011 Jul;26(4):219-22. doi: 10.5001/omj.2011.55.
9
Oncology nursing students' views of a modified OSCE.
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2005 Dec;9(4):351-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2005.03.001. Epub 2005 Jul 18.
10
The attitudes of medical students to the objective structured practical examination.医学生对客观结构化实践考试的态度。
Med Educ. 1988 Jan;22(1):40-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1988.tb00407.x.

阿曼护理专业学生对客观结构化临床考试的认知和态度。

Nursing Students' Perception and Attitude towards Objective Structured Clinical Examination in Oman.

机构信息

College of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.

出版信息

Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2022 Aug;22(3):343-350. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2.2022.012. Epub 2022 Aug 25.

DOI:10.18295/squmj.2.2022.012
PMID:36072076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9423745/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore undergraduate nursing students' perception and attitude towards the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).

METHODS

This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted between April-May 2020 among undergraduate nursing students at the College of Nursing at Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman. Two self-administered questionnaires were utilised to obtain data on students' perception and attitude towards OSCE. Students' feedback on OSCE was collected using open-ended questions about OSCE strengths, weaknesses and recommendations for improvement. Survey responses were based on a five-point ordinal scale, ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Students' feedback on OSCE was analysed as descriptive data by identifying the common themes and categorising them in groups.

RESULTS

A total of 160 students completed the study questionnaires. Most did not find the atmosphere of OSCE to be pleasant (66.3%) and preferred more modes of practical examination (40.6%). Moreover, 64.4% believed the time limitation to be inadequate. The data depict that 33.1% of the examinees deemed the OSCE more stressful than the full practical examination. In addition, a few students confirmed that the OSCE improved their communication skills and confidence in nursing skills.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study appear alarming in regard to students' perception regarding the overall process and validity of OSCE as an assessment method. Nursing educators must consider further evaluation and improvement of the OSCE in order to improve students' acceptance and appreciation of OSCE as an important form of clinical learning and assessment.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨本科护理学生对客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)的看法和态度。

方法

本横断面描述性研究于 2020 年 4 月至 5 月在阿曼马斯喀特苏丹卡布斯大学护理学院进行,调查对象为本科护理学生。使用两份自填式问卷收集学生对 OSCE 的看法和态度数据。学生对 OSCE 的反馈采用开放式问题收集,内容涉及 OSCE 的优点、缺点以及改进建议。调查回答基于五点定序量表,从强烈不同意到强烈同意。学生对 OSCE 的反馈作为描述性数据进行分析,确定共同主题并将其分类成组。

结果

共有 160 名学生完成了研究问卷。大多数学生认为 OSCE 的氛围不愉快(66.3%),更喜欢更多的实践考试模式(40.6%)。此外,64.4%的学生认为时间限制不足。数据显示,33.1%的考生认为 OSCE 比全面实践考试更具压力。此外,一些学生证实 OSCE 提高了他们的沟通技巧和护理技能的信心。

结论

本研究的结果令人担忧,涉及学生对 OSCE 作为评估方法的整体过程和有效性的看法。护理教育者必须考虑进一步评估和改进 OSCE,以提高学生对 OSCE 的接受程度和重视程度,将其作为一种重要的临床学习和评估形式。