• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英式英语中口语歧义词汇的显性规范与数据

Dominance Norms and Data for Spoken Ambiguous Words in British English.

作者信息

Gilbert Rebecca A, Rodd Jennifer M

机构信息

University College London, London, UK.

MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

J Cogn. 2022 Jan 6;5(1):4. doi: 10.5334/joc.194. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.5334/joc.194
PMID:36072113
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9400703/
Abstract

Words with multiple meanings (e.g. bark of the tree/dog) have provided important insights into several key topics within psycholinguistics. Experiments that use ambiguous words require stimuli to be carefully controlled for the relative frequency (dominance) of their different meanings, as this property has pervasive effects on numerous tasks. Dominance scores are often calculated from word association responses: by measuring the proportion of participants who respond to the word 'bark' with dog-related (e.g. "woof") or tree-related (e.g. "branch") responses, researchers can estimate people's relative preferences for these meanings. We collated data from a number of recent experiments and pre-tests to construct a dataset of 29,542 valid responses for 243 spoken ambiguous words from participants from the United Kingdom. We provide summary dominance data for the 182 ambiguous words that have a minimum of 100 responses, and a tool for automatically coding new word association responses based on responses in our coded set, which allows additional data to be more easily scored and added to this database. All files can be found at: .

摘要

具有多种含义的词(例如,“树皮”/“狗叫声”)为心理语言学中的几个关键主题提供了重要见解。使用歧义性词语的实验要求对刺激进行仔细控制,以确保其不同含义的相对频率(主导性),因为这一特性对众多任务都有普遍影响。主导性分数通常根据词语联想反应来计算:通过测量参与者用与狗相关(例如“汪汪”)或与树相关(例如“树枝”)的反应来回应“bark”这个词的比例,研究人员可以估计人们对这些含义的相对偏好。我们整理了来自一些近期实验和预测试的数据,构建了一个数据集,其中包含来自英国参与者对243个口语歧义性词语的29,542条有效反应。我们提供了182个至少有100条反应的歧义性词语的主导性数据汇总,以及一个基于我们编码集中的反应自动对新的词语联想反应进行编码的工具,这使得额外数据能够更轻松地计分并添加到该数据库中。所有文件可在:. 找到

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f14/9400703/52dd5e622a80/joc-5-1-194-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f14/9400703/1a85afadd806/joc-5-1-194-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f14/9400703/02629211c1f2/joc-5-1-194-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f14/9400703/0b5ea39d84be/joc-5-1-194-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f14/9400703/7e5cafc5c2a8/joc-5-1-194-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f14/9400703/db6229da22b4/joc-5-1-194-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f14/9400703/52dd5e622a80/joc-5-1-194-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f14/9400703/1a85afadd806/joc-5-1-194-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f14/9400703/02629211c1f2/joc-5-1-194-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f14/9400703/0b5ea39d84be/joc-5-1-194-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f14/9400703/7e5cafc5c2a8/joc-5-1-194-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f14/9400703/db6229da22b4/joc-5-1-194-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f14/9400703/52dd5e622a80/joc-5-1-194-g6.jpg

相似文献

1
Dominance Norms and Data for Spoken Ambiguous Words in British English.英式英语中口语歧义词汇的显性规范与数据
J Cogn. 2022 Jan 6;5(1):4. doi: 10.5334/joc.194. eCollection 2022.
2
Offline dominance and zeugmatic similarity normings of variably ambiguous words assessed against a neural language model (BERT).根据神经语言模型(BERT)评估的可变歧义词的离线优势和轭式相似性规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Jun;55(4):1537-1557. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01869-6. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
3
The Auditory English Lexicon Project: A multi-talker, multi-region psycholinguistic database of 10,170 spoken words and nonwords.听觉英语词汇项目:一个包含 10170 个口语词和非词的多说话人、多区域心理语言学数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Oct;52(5):2202-2231. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01352-0.
4
Roles of frontal and temporal regions in reinterpreting semantically ambiguous sentences.额颞区域在重新解释语义模糊句子中的作用。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jul 29;8:530. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00530. eCollection 2014.
5
The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales.格拉斯哥规范:9 个尺度上对 5500 个单词的评分。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Jun;51(3):1258-1270. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1099-3.
6
Frequency of meaning use for ambiguous and unambiguous words.歧义词和非歧义词意义使用的频率。
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1999 Aug;31(3):520-30. doi: 10.3758/bf03200731.
7
Semantic Ambiguity: Do Multiple Meanings Inhibit or Facilitate Word Recognition?语义歧义:多种含义会抑制还是促进单词识别?
J Psycholinguist Res. 2018 Jun;47(3):679-698. doi: 10.1007/s10936-017-9554-3.
8
Phonological ambiguity and lexical ambiguity: effects on visual and auditory word recognition.语音歧义与词汇歧义:对视觉和听觉单词识别的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990 Jul;16(4):569-80. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.16.4.569.
9
Automatic auditory processing of english words as indexed by the mismatch negativity, using a multiple deviant paradigm.使用多偏差范式,通过失配负波来索引英语单词的自动听觉处理。
Ear Hear. 2004 Jun;25(3):284-301. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000130800.88987.03.
10
Interhemispheric communication via direct connections for alternative meanings of ambiguous words.通过直接连接进行半球间通信以处理歧义单词的不同含义。
Brain Lang. 2002 Jan;80(1):77-96. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2582.

引用本文的文献

1
Pupil Size Tracks the Effects of Global Context and Semantic Ambiguity on Word-Meaning Processing.瞳孔大小跟踪全局语境和语义模糊对词义加工的影响。
J Cogn. 2025 Jul 29;8(1):42. doi: 10.5334/joc.454. eCollection 2025.
2
Studying Individual Differences in Language Comprehension: The Challenges of Item-Level Variability and Well-Matched Control Conditions.研究语言理解中的个体差异:项目层面变异性和匹配良好的对照条件所带来的挑战。
J Cogn. 2023 Sep 7;6(1):54. doi: 10.5334/joc.317. eCollection 2023.
3
Causal Contributions of the Domain-General (Multiple Demand) and the Language-Selective Brain Networks to Perceptual and Semantic Challenges in Speech Comprehension.

本文引用的文献

1
Gaming experience affects the interpretation of ambiguous words.游戏体验影响对歧义词汇的解读。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0243512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243512. eCollection 2020.
2
Settling Into Semantic Space: An Ambiguity-Focused Account of Word-Meaning Access.融入语义空间:一种以歧义为焦点的词义获取理论。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Mar;15(2):411-427. doi: 10.1177/1745691619885860. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
3
Contextual priming of word meanings is stabilized over sleep.语境启动对词义的稳定作用可以在睡眠中实现。
通用领域(多重需求)和语言选择性脑网络对言语理解中感知和语义挑战的因果贡献。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2022 Dec 16;3(4):665-698. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00081. eCollection 2022.
4
Learning about the meanings of ambiguous words: evidence from a word-meaning priming paradigm with short narratives.从带有简短叙述的词义启动范式看歧义词的词义学习
PeerJ. 2022 Oct 19;10:e14070. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14070. eCollection 2022.
Cognition. 2019 Jan;182:109-126. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
4
Listeners and readers generalize their experience with word meanings across modalities.听众和读者会跨模态归纳他们对词义的体验。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Oct;44(10):1533-1561. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000532. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
5
Retuning of lexical-semantic representations: Repetition and spacing effects in word-meaning priming.词汇语义表征的重新调整:词义启动中的重复与间隔效应
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Jul;44(7):1130-1150. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000507. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
6
Accent modulates access to word meaning: Evidence for a speaker-model account of spoken word recognition.口音调节对词义的获取:支持口语单词识别的说话者模型解释的证据。
Cogn Psychol. 2017 Nov;98:73-101. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
7
Baseball fans don't like lumpy batters: Influence of domain knowledge on the access of subordinate meanings.棒球迷不喜欢身材凹凸不平的击球手:领域知识对下位意义通达的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016 Nov 8:1-11. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1251470.
8
Relative meaning frequencies for 578 homonyms in two Spanish dialects: A cross-linguistic extension of the English eDom norms.
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):950-62. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0639-3.
9
eDom: norming software and relative meaning frequencies for 544 English homonyms.eDom:544 个英语同音异义词的规范软件和相对意义频率。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Dec;44(4):1015-27. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0199-8.
10
Meaning resolution processes for words: a parallel independent model.词汇的意义解析过程:一种并行独立模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Mar;7(1):49-82. doi: 10.3758/bf03210725.