Hassan Musheerul, Haq Shiekh Marifatul, Ahmad Riyaz, Majeed Muhammad, Sahito Hakim Ali, Shirani Madeeha, Mubeen Iqra, Aziz Muhammad Abdul, Pieroni Andrea, Bussmann Rainer W, Alataway Abed, Dewidar Ahmed Z, Al-Yafrsi Mohamed, Elansary Hosam O, Yessoufou Kowiyou
Clybay Research Private Limited, Bangalore 560114, India.
Department of Ethnobotany, Institute of Botany, Ilia State University, 0105 Tbilisi, Georgia.
Animals (Basel). 2022 Sep 2;12(17):2276. doi: 10.3390/ani12172276.
Animal-derived products have an important role in treating many health conditions and have widely been used across cultures. In South Asia, ethnozoological research has been conducted only by a small number of researchers. Therefore, this area of research needs further exploration in order to preserve the eroding ethnozoological knowledge of medicinal animals severely affected by ongoing social change. This study was conducted in the region of Jammu and Kashmir from February 2019 to August 2021. The study was carried out among eight different ethnic groups living in the region. A total of 374 informants were selected and data were collected through semi-structured interviews and verified through group discussions. Data was analyzed using different statistical tools, including R 4.0.0. The cross-cultural data were compared through Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Genomics software and later subjected to further analysis, applying Pearson correlation and ordination techniques (Principal Component Analysis). We recorded a total of 79 animal species being used by the eight studied ethnic groups in the region. Wild animal species were mainly used for therapeutic purposes. Chest infections, sexual problems, and paralysis were frequently treated diseases. Flesh was the most commonly part used. The cross-cultural comparison showed a remarkable heterogeneity in the use of the animals among the different groups, which could be an effect to the historical sociocultural stratifications, as well as different religious affiliation of certain groups preventing them to forage or hunt certain animals. Some groups however showed prominent overlap of uses of some recorded species. For instance, and were commonly used by both Gujjar and Pahari, which could be referred to the fact that they have gone through significant socio-cultural contact, and they are exogamous to each other. The Pearson correlation coefficient supported the strength and direction of an association between ethnic groups and regions. The study makes an important contribution to the field of ethnozoology in the Himalayas by providing insights to understand the historical human and nature relationships and supplying a baseline for developing future conservation efforts in the region to protect the wild fauna.
动物源产品在治疗多种健康状况方面发挥着重要作用,并且在不同文化中都有广泛应用。在南亚,民族动物学研究仅由少数研究人员开展。因此,这一研究领域需要进一步探索,以保护正受到当前社会变革严重影响的、不断流失的药用动物民族动物学知识。本研究于2019年2月至2021年8月在查谟和克什米尔地区进行。研究在该地区八个不同民族群体中开展。共选取了374名 informant,通过半结构化访谈收集数据,并通过小组讨论进行核实。使用包括R 4.0.0在内的不同统计工具对数据进行分析。通过生物信息学和进化基因组学软件对跨文化数据进行比较,随后应用皮尔逊相关性和排序技术(主成分分析)进行进一步分析。我们记录了该地区八个被研究民族群体共使用79种动物物种。野生动物物种主要用于治疗目的。胸部感染、性问题和瘫痪是常见的治疗疾病。肉是最常使用的部位。跨文化比较显示,不同群体在动物使用方面存在显著异质性,这可能是历史社会文化分层的影响,以及某些群体不同的宗教信仰使其无法觅食或捕猎某些动物所致。然而,一些群体在某些记录物种的使用上表现出显著重叠。例如,古吉拉特族和帕哈里族都常用[此处原文缺失具体物种名],这可能是因为他们经历了重大的社会文化接触,并且相互之间实行族外婚。皮尔逊相关系数支持了民族群体与地区之间关联的强度和方向。该研究通过提供理解历史上人与自然关系的见解,并为该地区未来开展保护野生动物的保护工作提供基线,对喜马拉雅地区的民族动物学领域做出了重要贡献。