Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Laboratory (Lab-Sys), CNPq-UFRN, Department of Nutrition, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal 59078-970, Brazil.
Postgraduate Program in Public Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal 59078-970, Brazil.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 24;19(17):10522. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710522.
The school is a favorable environment for the development of interventions to prevent obesity. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the effects of school-based food and nutrition education interventions on adolescent food consumption. The literature search was conducted on databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ERIC, Science Direct, Web of Science, Cochrane, LILACS, and ADOLEC. The following research strategies were focused on: population (adolescents), intervention (food and nutrition education), outcome (food consumption), and study design (clinical trial). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines were followed and all stages of this review were performed by two researchers and, when necessary, a third researcher resolved discrepancies. Included studies are randomized clinical trials (RCT). A total of 24 articles were included for review and 11 articles in meta-analysis. In the evaluation of the general effects, there was a significant effect (mean difference (MD) for fruit consumption (MD = 0.09, CI 0.05, 0.14) in serving/day; and for vegetables (MD = 0.59, IC 0.15, 1.03) at times/week. In the consumption of FV (fruits and vegetables), there was no significant effect (standardized mean difference (SMD) of interventions in their consumption (SMD = 0.00, 95% C1 -0.11, 0.11). The evidence available in this review and meta-analysis concludes that food and nutrition education interventions in schools presented favorable results in the food consumption of adolescents. Registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42019116520).
学校是开展预防肥胖干预措施的有利环境。本系统评价的目的是评估基于学校的食物和营养教育干预对青少年食物消费的影响。文献检索在以下数据库中进行:MEDLINE/PubMed、Embase、Scopus、ERIC、Science Direct、Web of Science、Cochrane、LILACS 和 ADOLEC。以下研究策略侧重于:人群(青少年)、干预(食物和营养教育)、结果(食物消费)和研究设计(临床试验)。本综述遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明指南,所有阶段均由两名研究人员进行,如果需要,第三名研究人员解决分歧。纳入的研究是随机临床试验(RCT)。共有 24 篇文章被纳入综述,11 篇文章进行了荟萃分析。在评估一般效果时,发现水果摄入量(每天摄入量的平均差异(MD)=0.09,置信区间(CI)0.05,0.14)和蔬菜摄入量(每周摄入量的 MD=0.59,CI 0.15,1.03)存在显著效果。在 FV(水果和蔬菜)消费方面,干预措施对其消费的影响没有显著效果(标准化平均差异(SMD)=0.00,95%CI-0.11,0.11)。本综述和荟萃分析中的现有证据表明,学校的食物和营养教育干预措施在青少年的食物消费方面取得了有利的结果。在 PROSPERO 数据库中注册(CRD42019116520)。