• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国 1997 年至 2017 年长江经济带二氧化硫排放量的定量分析。

Quantitative Analysis of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 1997 to 2017, China.

机构信息

Shihezi University, Shihezi 832000, China.

Key Laboratory of Southwest China Wildlife Resources Conservation, Ministry of Education, China West Normal University, Nanchong 637009, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 29;19(17):10770. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710770.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph191710770
PMID:36078485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9518338/
Abstract

Economic development is responsible for excessive sulfur dioxide (SO) emissions, environmental pressure increases, and human and environmental risks. This study used spatial autocorrelation, the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC), and the Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index model to study the spatiotemporal variation characteristics and influencing factors of SO emissions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) from 1997 to 2017. Our results show that the total SO emissions in the YREB rose from 513.14 × 10 t to 974.00 × 10 t before dropping to 321.97 × 10 t. The SO emissions from 11 provinces first increased and then decreased, each with different turning points. For example, the emission trends changed in Yunnan in 2011 and in Anhui in 2015, while the other nine provinces saw their emission trends change during 2005-2006. Furthermore, the SO emissions in the YREB showed a significant agglomeration phenomenon, with a Moran index of approximately 0.233-0.987. Moreover, the EKC of SO emissions and per capita GDP in the YREB was N-shaped. The EKCs of eight of the 11 provinces were N-shaped (Shanghai, Zhejiang, Anhui, Jiangxi, Sichuan, Guizhou, Hunan, and Chongqing) and those of the other three were inverted U-shaped (Jiangsu, Yunnan, and Hubei). Thus, economic development can both promote and inhibit the emission of SO. Finally, during the study period, the technical effect (approximately -1387.97 × 10-130.24 × 10 t) contributed the most, followed by the economic (approximately 27.81 × 10-1255.59 × 10 t), structural (approximately -56.45 × 10-343.90 × 10 t), and population effects (approximately 4.25 × 10-39.70 × 10 t). Technology was the dominant factor in SO emissions reduction, while economic growth played a major role in promoting SO emissions. Therefore, to promote SO emission reduction, technological innovations and advances should be the primary point of focus.

摘要

经济发展导致了过多的二氧化硫(SO)排放,增加了环境压力,给人类和环境带来了风险。本研究采用空间自相关、环境库兹涅茨曲线(EKC)和对数平均迪氏指数模型,研究了 1997 年至 2017 年期间长江经济带(YREB)SO 排放的时空变化特征及其影响因素。研究结果表明,YREB 的总 SO 排放量从 513.14×10 t 增加到 974.00×10 t,然后下降到 321.97×10 t。11 个省份的 SO 排放量先增加后减少,每个省份的转折点都不同。例如,云南的排放趋势在 2011 年发生变化,安徽在 2015 年发生变化,而其他 9 个省份的排放趋势则在 2005-2006 年发生变化。此外,YREB 的 SO 排放量存在显著的集聚现象,莫兰指数约为 0.233-0.987。此外,YREB 的 SO 排放与人均 GDP 的环境库兹涅茨曲线呈 N 型。11 个省份中的 8 个(上海、浙江、安徽、江西、四川、贵州、湖南和重庆)的 EKC 呈 N 型,而另外 3 个(江苏、云南和湖北)呈倒 U 型。因此,经济发展既可以促进也可以抑制 SO 的排放。最后,在研究期间,技术效应(约-1387.97×10-130.24×10 t)的贡献最大,其次是经济效应(约 27.81×10-1255.59×10 t)、结构效应(约-56.45×10-343.90×10 t)和人口效应(约 4.25×10-39.70×10 t)。技术是减少 SO 排放的主要因素,而经济增长在促进 SO 排放方面起着主要作用。因此,为了促进 SO 减排,技术创新和进步应该是重点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47c/9518338/9adb9e5c8655/ijerph-19-10770-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47c/9518338/58de14204c23/ijerph-19-10770-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47c/9518338/b7f6b2c4a72f/ijerph-19-10770-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47c/9518338/9adb9e5c8655/ijerph-19-10770-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47c/9518338/58de14204c23/ijerph-19-10770-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47c/9518338/b7f6b2c4a72f/ijerph-19-10770-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a47c/9518338/9adb9e5c8655/ijerph-19-10770-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantitative Analysis of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from 1997 to 2017, China.中国 1997 年至 2017 年长江经济带二氧化硫排放量的定量分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 29;19(17):10770. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710770.
2
[Spatial Distribution Pattern and Influencing Factors of Industrial Pollution Emissions in Yangtze River Economic Belt].长江经济带工业污染排放的空间分布格局及影响因素
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2021 Aug 8;42(8):3820-3828. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202011017.
3
Socio-economic drivers of rising CO emissions at the sectoral and sub-regional levels in the Yangtze River Economic Belt.长江经济带部门和次区域层面 CO2 排放上升的社会经济驱动因素。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jul 15;290:112617. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112617. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
4
Spatial temporal patterns and driving factors of industrial pollution and structures in the Yangtze River Economic Belt.长江经济带工业污染与结构时空格局及其驱动因素。
Chemosphere. 2022 Sep;303(Pt 2):134996. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134996. Epub 2022 May 18.
5
Spatial-Temporal Analysis and Driving Factors Decomposition of (De)Coupling Condition of SO Emissions in China.中国 SO 排放脱钩时空分析及驱动因素分解
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 15;17(18):6725. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186725.
6
Cross-Regional Comparative Study on Carbon Emission Efficiency of China's Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on the Meta-Frontier.基于超前沿的中国长江经济带碳排放效率的跨区域比较研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 20;16(4):619. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16040619.
7
A Study on The Driving Factors and Spatial Spillover of Carbon Emission Intensity in The Yangtze River Economic Belt under Double Control Action.双控行动下长江经济带碳排放强度的驱动因素及空间溢出研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 13;16(22):4452. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224452.
8
Examining the spatiotemporal change of forest resource carrying capacity of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China.考察中国长江经济带森林资源承载力的时空变化。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jun;27(17):21213-21230. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08408-w. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
9
Research on the spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of green economic efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt.长江经济带绿色经济效率的时空演变及影响因素研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Sep;29(45):68257-68268. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20542-1. Epub 2022 May 10.
10
A perspective of ecological civilization: research on the spatial coupling and coordination of the energy-economy-environment system in the Yangtze River Economic Belt.生态文明视角下的长江经济带能-经-环系统的空间耦合协调研究。
Environ Monit Assess. 2022 May 6;194(6):403. doi: 10.1007/s10661-022-10065-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Study on spatial pattern and coupling of county traffic superiority degree and new-type urbanization level in Guizhou Province, China.中国贵州省县域交通优势度与新型城镇化水平的空间格局及耦合研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 5;15(1):7634. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86346-8.
2
Analysis on Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Air Quality Index (AQI) in China.中国空气质量指数(AQI)的时空演变及影响因素分析
Toxics. 2022 Nov 22;10(12):712. doi: 10.3390/toxics10120712.
3
Solid Fuel Combustion and Air Pollution: Filling the Data Gap and Future Priorities.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantification of industrial wastewater discharge from the major cities in Sichuan province, China.中国四川省主要城市工业废水排放量的量化。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(34):51567-51577. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19316-6. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
2
EKC Test of the Relationship between Nitrogen Dioxide Pollution and Economic Growth-A Spatial Econometric Analysis Based on Chinese City Data.基于中国城市数据的氮氧化物污染与经济增长关系的 EKC 检验——空间计量分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 15;18(18):9697. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189697.
3
Decoupling economic development from municipal solid waste generation in China's cities: Assessment and prediction based on Tapio method and EKC models.
固体燃料燃烧与空气污染:填补数据空白与未来优先事项。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 15;19(22):15024. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215024.
中国城市经济发展与城市生活垃圾产生脱钩评估与预测:基于脱钩方法和 EKC 模型。
Waste Manag. 2021 Sep;133:37-48. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.07.034. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
4
Discerning drivers and future reduction paths of energy-related CO emissions in China: combining EKC with three-layer LMDI.辨别中国能源相关 CO 排放的驱动因素和未来减排路径:结合 EKC 与三层 LMDI 方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jul;28(27):36611-36625. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13129-9. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
5
Spatiotemporal variations and determinants of water pollutant discharge in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China: A spatial econometric analysis.中国长江经济带水污染物排放的时空变化及其决定因素:空间计量经济学分析。
Environ Pollut. 2021 Feb 15;271:116320. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116320. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
6
Green research and development activities and SO intensity: an analysis for China.绿色研发活动与 SO2 强度:对中国的分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Apr;28(13):16165-16180. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11669-0. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
7
Spatial-Temporal Analysis and Driving Factors Decomposition of (De)Coupling Condition of SO Emissions in China.中国 SO 排放脱钩时空分析及驱动因素分解
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 15;17(18):6725. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186725.
8
Association between the incidence of acute respiratory diseases in children and ambient concentrations of SO, PM and chemical elements in fine particles.儿童急性呼吸道疾病发病率与环境中 SO、PM 和细颗粒物中化学元素浓度的关系。
Environ Res. 2020 Sep;188:109619. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109619. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
9
Effects of the socio-economic influencing factors on SO pollution in Chinese cities: A spatial econometric analysis based on satellite observed data.社会经济因素对中国城市 SO2 污染的影响:基于卫星观测数据的空间计量分析。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Aug 15;268:110667. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110667. Epub 2020 May 5.
10
Decline of net SO emission intensity in China's thermal power generation: Decomposition and attribution analysis.中国火力发电净 SO 排放强度下降:分解与归因分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jun 1;719:137367. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137367. Epub 2020 Feb 18.