Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Interdisciplinary Tinnitus Centre, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 2;19(17):11005. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711005.
Previous studies have shown a high prevalence of sleep disturbances in tinnitus patients. However, no study has yet evaluated subjective sleep satisfaction. The present study aimed to investigate associations of self-reported sleep satisfaction with sociodemographic factors, tinnitus-related distress, depression, and self-reported quality of life. This is a retrospective analysis of 2344 outpatients with tinnitus presenting at a tertiary German tinnitus clinic from 2010 to 2020. Patients who filled in five questionnaires (Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), Major Depression Inventory (MDI), Tinnitus Sample Case History Questionnaire (TSCHQ), and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version (WHOQOL-Bref)) were included. Based on the question about sleep satisfaction in the WHOQOL-Bref, group classification into (I) sleep-satisfied, (II) neither satisfied or dissatisfied, and (III) sleep-dissatisfied patients was performed. Associations between sleep satisfaction and quality of life, depression, tinnitus distress, and tinnitus characteristics were analyzed by group differences and a multinomial regression model with elastic net penalization. A total of 42.38% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with sleep, whereas 40.91% of patients were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with sleep. The remaining patients reported being neither satisfied nor dissatisfied with sleep. Sleep-dissatisfied patients were significantly more burdened in questionnaires on depressive symptoms (MDI), tinnitus distress (TQ, THI), and quality of life (WHOQOL-Bref). In addition, they suffered significantly more often from comorbidities such as headache, neck pain, or temporomandibular joint disorder (TMJ). The elastic net regression based on sum scores of THI, TQ, MDI, the four domains of WHOQOL-Bref, as well as all individual questions from the TSCHQ was able to classify patients satisfied with their sleep with an accuracy of 79%, 87.8% sensitivity, and 70.4% specificity. The model could not identify patients indifferent with the quality of their sleep (neither satisfied nor dissatisfied) (sensitivity: 0%; specificity: 100%). The accuracy of the model to predict patients dissatisfied with their sleep was 80.7%, with 83% sensitivity and 78.4% specificity. Poor physical and mental health (Domain I/II WHOQOL-Bref) as well as tinnitus distress were the strongest predictors of sleep dissatisfaction. Conversely, for sleep satisfaction, good physical and mental health as well as low tinnitus distress were the strongest predictors. The division into sleep-satisfied and sleep-dissatisfied tinnitus patients allows a very good discrimination regarding disease burden as indicated by depression, tinnitus distress, quality of life, and pain-related comorbidities. Physical and mental health as well as tinnitus distress seem to be strongly related to sleep satisfaction underscoring the concept of "tinnitus" versus "tinnitus disorder", but also the importance of sleep satisfaction as a global health indicator. Moreover, these data indicate the relevance of addressing sleep disorders in the therapeutic management of chronic tinnitus patients.
先前的研究表明耳鸣患者普遍存在睡眠障碍。然而,尚无研究评估主观睡眠满意度。本研究旨在探讨自报睡眠满意度与社会人口因素、耳鸣相关困扰、抑郁和自报生活质量之间的关联。这是对 2010 年至 2020 年间在德国一家三级耳鸣诊所就诊的 2344 名耳鸣患者进行的回顾性分析。纳入填写了五份问卷(耳鸣残疾量表(THI)、耳鸣问卷(TQ)、大抑郁量表(MDI)、耳鸣样本病例历史问卷(TSCHQ)和世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL-Bref)的患者。根据 WHOQOL-Bref 中关于睡眠满意度的问题,将患者分为(I)睡眠满意、(II)既不满意也不满足和(III)睡眠不满意三组。通过组间差异和具有弹性网惩罚的多项回归模型分析睡眠满意度与生活质量、抑郁、耳鸣困扰和耳鸣特征之间的关系。共有 42.38%的患者对睡眠感到满意或非常满意,而 40.91%的患者对睡眠感到不满意或非常不满意。其余患者报告对睡眠既不满意也不满足。睡眠不满意的患者在抑郁症状(MDI)、耳鸣困扰(TQ、THI)和生活质量(WHOQOL-Bref)问卷上的负担明显更重。此外,他们更经常患有头痛、颈部疼痛或颞下颌关节紊乱(TMJ)等共病。基于 THI、TQ、MDI、WHOQOL-Bref 的四个领域以及 TSCHQ 的所有个别问题的总和得分的弹性网回归能够以 79%的准确率、87.8%的灵敏度和 70.4%的特异性对睡眠满意的患者进行分类。该模型无法识别对睡眠质量既不满足也不感兴趣的患者(既不满意也不满足)(灵敏度:0%;特异性:100%)。该模型预测睡眠不满意患者的准确率为 80.7%,灵敏度为 83%,特异性为 78.4%。身心健康状况较差(WHOQOL-Bref 第一/二域)和耳鸣困扰是睡眠不满意的最强预测因素。相反,对于睡眠满意度,身心健康状况良好和耳鸣困扰程度低是最强的预测因素。将耳鸣患者分为睡眠满意和睡眠不满意两组,可以很好地区分抑郁、耳鸣困扰、生活质量和与疼痛相关的共病等疾病负担。身心健康状况以及耳鸣困扰似乎与睡眠满意度密切相关,这突出了“耳鸣”与“耳鸣障碍”的概念,也强调了睡眠满意度作为一个整体健康指标的重要性。此外,这些数据表明,在慢性耳鸣患者的治疗管理中,解决睡眠障碍非常重要。