• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国生态省政策是否有效降低了污染物排放强度?

Does China's Eco-Province Policy Effectively Reduce the Pollutant Emission Intensities?

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 3;19(17):11025. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711025.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph191711025
PMID:36078741
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9517790/
Abstract

Economic development and environmental conservation are two important challenges for China. A series of initiatives including Eco-province (EP) policies have been taken to achieve sustainable development by the Chinese government. Increasing concerns regarding policy implications on sustainable development have increased attention to the topic. However, the research on the relationship between economic development and pollutant (COD, SO) emission intensities after the implementation of EP policy remains inadequate. We applied a Time-Varying Difference-in-Differences Model by employing Chinese provincial panel data to quantitatively study the policy effect, and further utilized the Mediating Effect Model to analyze the mechanism. The article generates several findings: (1) The EP policy had overall inhibitory effects on both COD and SO emission intensities, and it would reduce the emission intensity by 4.99% and 6.77% on average, respectively. However, there was a five year lag in the policy effect. (2) The policy effect was significant in the western and central provinces with high pollutant emission intensities, but not in the eastern provinces. (3) The primary inhibiting mediating effects of Eco-province policy to lower pollutant emission intensity were increased GDP per capita and inventions.

摘要

经济发展与环境保护是中国面临的两项重要挑战。中国政府采取了一系列包括生态省份(EP)政策在内的措施,以实现可持续发展。由于人们越来越关注政策对可持续发展的影响,该主题受到了更多关注。然而,对于 EP 政策实施后经济发展与污染物(COD、SO)排放强度之间的关系的研究仍不够充分。我们应用时变双重差分模型,利用中国省级面板数据进行定量研究,进一步利用中介效应模型分析了作用机制。本文得出以下几点结论:(1)EP 政策对 COD 和 SO 排放强度均具有总体抑制作用,平均分别降低排放强度 4.99%和 6.77%。但政策效果存在 5 年滞后。(2)政策效果在污染排放强度较高的西部和中部省份显著,但在东部省份不显著。(3)生态省份政策降低污染物排放强度的主要中介抑制效应是人均 GDP 和发明的增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff0/9517790/2a2ae4f114b3/ijerph-19-11025-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff0/9517790/807f238a3965/ijerph-19-11025-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff0/9517790/3376d2a0559b/ijerph-19-11025-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff0/9517790/7e6ffd0eafc2/ijerph-19-11025-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff0/9517790/2a2ae4f114b3/ijerph-19-11025-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff0/9517790/807f238a3965/ijerph-19-11025-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff0/9517790/3376d2a0559b/ijerph-19-11025-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff0/9517790/7e6ffd0eafc2/ijerph-19-11025-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fff0/9517790/2a2ae4f114b3/ijerph-19-11025-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Does China's Eco-Province Policy Effectively Reduce the Pollutant Emission Intensities?中国生态省政策是否有效降低了污染物排放强度?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 3;19(17):11025. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711025.
2
Decoupling of wastewater eco-environmental damage and China's economic development.废水生态环境破坏与中国经济发展脱钩。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Oct 1;789:147980. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147980. Epub 2021 May 25.
3
Research on the evolution of spatial network structure of tourism eco-efficiency and its influencing factors in China's provinces based on carbon emission accounting.基于碳排放核算的中国省域旅游生态效率空间网络结构演化及其影响因素研究
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 14;17(9):e0272667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272667. eCollection 2022.
4
Local Government Competition and Regional Green Development in China: The Mediating Role of Environmental Regulation.中国地方政府竞争与区域绿色发展:环境规制的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 16;17(10):3485. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103485.
5
Spatial distribution and convergence of provincial carbon intensity in China and its influencing factors: a spatial panel analysis from 2000 to 2017.中国省级碳强度的空间分布与收敛及其影响因素:2000 年至 2017 年的空间面板分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Oct;28(39):54575-54593. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14375-7. Epub 2021 May 20.
6
The Double-Edged Sword of Urbanization and Its Nexus with Eco-Efficiency in China.城市化的双刃剑及其与中国生态效率的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 9;17(2):446. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020446.
7
Policy inference from technological innovation, renewable energy, and financial development for sustainable development goals (SDGs): insight from asymmetric and bootstrap Granger causality approaches.从技术创新、可再生能源和金融发展角度对可持续发展目标(SDGs)的政策推断:来自非对称和自举格兰杰因果关系方法的见解。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(39):59104-59117. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19730-w. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
8
Foreign Direct Investment's Impact on China's Economic Growth, Technological Innovation and Pollution.外国直接投资对中国经济增长、技术创新和污染的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 10;18(6):2839. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062839.
9
Can information and communication technology reduce CO emission? A quantile regression analysis.信息和通信技术能否减少二氧化碳排放?分位数回归分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Nov;26(32):32977-32992. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06380-8. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
10
Can sustainable development policy reduce carbon emissions? Empirical evidence from resource-based cities in China.可持续发展政策能否减少碳排放?来自中国资源型城市的经验证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 10;838(Pt 3):156341. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156341. Epub 2022 May 29.

本文引用的文献

1
A Free-Market Environmentalist Enquiry on Spain's Energy Transition along with Its Recent Increasing Electricity Prices.自由市场环保主义者对西班牙能源转型及其近期电价上涨的调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 2;19(15):9493. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159493.
2
Does the green credit policy reduce the carbon emission intensity of heavily polluting industries? -Evidence from China's industrial sectors.绿色信贷政策是否降低了重污染行业的碳排放强度?——来自中国工业部门的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Mar 2;311:114815. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114815.
3
The structure of environmental governance: How public policies connect and partition California's oil and gas policy landscape.
环境治理结构:公共政策如何连接和划分加利福尼亚州的石油和天然气政策格局。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Apr 15;284:112069. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112069. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
4
The effects of heterogeneous environmental regulations on water pollution control: Quasi-natural experimental evidence from China.异质环境规制对水污染控制的影响:来自中国的准自然实验证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jan 10;751:141550. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141550. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
5
[Ecological demonstration activity and eco-civilization construction mode: review and prospects].[生态示范活动与生态文明建设模式:回顾与展望]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2013 Apr;24(4):1177-82.
6
Better environmental regulation--contributions from risk-based decision-making.更好的环境监管——基于风险的决策所做的贡献。
Sci Total Environ. 2009 Sep 15;407(19):5283-8. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.06.013. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
7
Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning.共同管理的演变:知识生成、桥梁组织与社会学习的作用
J Environ Manage. 2009 Apr;90(5):1692-702. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001. Epub 2008 Dec 24.
8
Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models.用于评估和比较多重中介模型中间接效应的渐近和重抽样策略。
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879-91. doi: 10.3758/brm.40.3.879.
9
Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment.经济增长、承载能力与环境。
Science. 1995 Apr 28;268(5210):520-1. doi: 10.1126/science.268.5210.520.
10
Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems.为增强社会生态系统的恢复力而进行的适应性共同管理。
Environ Manage. 2004 Jul;34(1):75-90. doi: 10.1007/s00267-003-0101-7. Epub 2004 Jun 23.