Gouldson A, Morton A, Pollard S J T
University of Leeds, Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, Yorkshire LS2 9JT, UK.
Sci Total Environ. 2009 Sep 15;407(19):5283-8. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.06.013. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
Internationally, pressure is being exerted on governments and regulators to develop modern forms of regulation that deliver more for less, and in better ways. We discuss the ways in which one large regulator, the Environment Agency for England and Wales, has responded to such pressures by implementing risk-based approaches to regulation. After exploring the context for key elements of risk-based environmental regulation, we consider the evolving influence of such approaches. We discuss the impacts against the UK Government's principles for better regulation and the key criteria for policy evaluation, before considering some of the challenges: the need to i) understand the best practice and promote consistency in risk-based regulation; ii) develop reliable, responsive forms of risk assessment and monitoring; iii) build capacities for responsive risk regulation; iv) evaluate the influence of different regulatory styles; and v) better understand the potential role of the private sector.
在国际上,政府和监管机构面临着压力,要求其制定现代监管形式,以更低的成本提供更多更好的服务。我们讨论了一个大型监管机构——英格兰和威尔士环境局,是如何通过实施基于风险的监管方法来应对这些压力的。在探讨基于风险的环境监管关键要素的背景之后,我们考虑了这些方法不断演变的影响。在考虑一些挑战之前,我们讨论了这些影响与英国政府更好监管原则以及政策评估关键标准的契合度,这些挑战包括:一是需要了解最佳实践并促进基于风险的监管的一致性;二是开发可靠、灵敏的风险评估和监测形式;三是建立应对风险监管的能力;四是评估不同监管方式的影响;五是更好地理解私营部门的潜在作用。