Hoffmann Manuela A, Müller-Hübenthal Jonas, Rosar Florian, Fischer Nicolas, von Eyben Finn Edler, Buchholz Hans-Georg, Wieler Helmut J, Schreckenberger Mathias
Department of Occupational Health & Safety, Federal Ministry of Defense, 53123 Bonn, Germany.
Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg-University, 55101 Mainz, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 29;11(17):5064. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175064.
Hybrid imaging with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is gaining importance as an increasingly meaningful tool for prostate cancer (PC) diagnostics and as a guide for therapy decisions. This study aims to investigate and compare the performance of [F]PSMA-1007 (F-PSMA) and [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (Ga-PSMA) in the initial staging of PC patients.
The data of 88 biopsy-proven patients were retrospectively evaluated. PSMA-avid lesions were compared with the histopathologic Gleason Score (GS) for prostate biopsies, and the results were plotted by receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-curve. Optimal maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) cut-off values were rated using the Youden index.
F-PSMA was able to distinguish GS ≤ 7a from ≥7b with a sensitivity of 62%, specificity of 85%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 92%, and accuracy of 67% for a SUV of 8.95, whereas sensitivity was 54%, specificity 91%, PPV 93%, and accuracy 66% for Ga-PSMA (SUV 8.7).
Both methods demonstrated a high concordance of detected PSMA-avid lesions with histopathologically proven PC. F-PSMA and Ga-PSMA are both suitable for the characterization of primary PC with a comparable correlation of PSMA-avid lesions with GS. Neither method showed a superior advantage. Our calculated SUV thresholds may represent valuable parameters in clinical use to distinguish clinically significant PC (csPC) from non-csPC.
前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)的混合成像作为一种对前列腺癌(PC)诊断越来越有意义的工具以及治疗决策的指导,正变得越来越重要。本研究旨在调查和比较[F]PSMA-1007(F-PSMA)和[Ga]Ga-PSMA-11正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(Ga-PSMA)在PC患者初始分期中的性能。
对88例经活检证实的患者数据进行回顾性评估。将PSMA摄取阳性的病变与前列腺活检的组织病理学Gleason评分(GS)进行比较,并通过受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线绘制结果。使用约登指数确定最佳最大标准化摄取值(SUV)截断值。
对于SUV为8.95的F-PSMA,能够区分GS≤7a和≥7b,敏感性为62%,特异性为85%,阳性预测值(PPV)为92%,准确性为67%;而对于Ga-PSMA(SUV 8.7),敏感性为54%,特异性为91%,PPV为93%,准确性为66%。
两种方法均显示检测到的PSMA摄取阳性病变与组织病理学证实的PC具有高度一致性。F-PSMA和Ga-PSMA都适用于原发性PC的特征描述,PSMA摄取阳性病变与GS的相关性相当。两种方法均未显示出明显优势。我们计算出的SUV阈值可能是临床应用中区分临床显著PC(csPC)和非csPC的有价值参数。