Suppr超能文献

玻璃体内注射地塞米松植入物(IDI)单独及联合导航577纳米阈下微脉冲激光(SML)治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿

Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant (IDI) Alone and Combined with Navigated 577 nm Subthreshold Micropulse Laser (SML) for Diabetic Macular Oedema.

作者信息

Toto Lisa, D'Aloisio Rossella, Quarta Alberto, Libertini Daniele, D'Onofrio Giada, De Nicola Chiara, Romano Anna, Mastropasqua Rodolfo

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Science of Ageing, Ophthalmology Clinic, University G. D'Annunzio Chieti-Pescara, Via Dei Vestini 31, 66100 Chieti, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 2;11(17):5200. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175200.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The anatomical and functional changes after intravitreal dexamethasone implant (IDI) alone and combined with navigated subthreshold micropulse laser (NSML) in diabetic macular oedema (DMO) were compared.

METHODS

Patients with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and DMO were enrolled in this prospective study and were randomly assigned to two different treatment groups: thirty patients were treated with IDI (IDI group), and the other 30 patients received IDI combined with NSML treatment (combined IDI/NSML group). All patients during a 6-month follow-up underwent best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) evaluation and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT). The main outcome measures were: BCVA, central macular thickness (CMT); (3) choroidal vascularity index (CVI), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SCHT); and time to retreatment between IDI at baseline and the second implant in both groups.

RESULTS

BCVA, CMT, and SCHT significantly decreased starting from the 1-month follow-up and CVI from 3 months in both groups. The between-group differences were significantly different from 1-month follow-up for BCVA, from 5-month follow-up for CMT and SCHT, and from 4-month follow-up for CVI. The Needed to Treat analysis indicated that six patients would have to be treated with SML after IDI in order for just one person to receive a benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

the combined treatment showed good anatomical and functional outcomes for the treatment of DMO. In addition, IDI/SML seems to reduce injection frequency over time, improving patients' quality of life and reducing the socio-economic burden.

摘要

背景

比较单纯玻璃体内注射地塞米松植入物(IDI)以及联合导航阈下微脉冲激光(NSML)治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DMO)后的解剖学和功能变化。

方法

将临床确诊为非增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(NPDR)和DMO的患者纳入这项前瞻性研究,并随机分为两个不同的治疗组:30例患者接受IDI治疗(IDI组),另外30例患者接受IDI联合NSML治疗(IDI/NSML联合组)。所有患者在6个月的随访期间均接受最佳矫正视力(BCVA)评估和光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD OCT)。主要观察指标为:BCVA、中心黄斑厚度(CMT);(3)脉络膜血管指数(CVI)、黄斑中心凹下脉络膜厚度(SCHT);以及两组中基线IDI与第二次植入之间的再次治疗时间。

结果

两组从1个月随访开始,BCVA、CMT和SCHT均显著降低,CVI从3个月开始显著降低。组间差异在1个月随访时BCVA有显著差异,5个月随访时CMT和SCHT有显著差异,4个月随访时CVI有显著差异。需治数分析表明,IDI治疗后需要6例患者接受SML治疗才能使1人获益。

结论

联合治疗在DMO治疗中显示出良好的解剖学和功能结局。此外,IDI/SML似乎随着时间推移可减少注射频率,改善患者生活质量并减轻社会经济负担。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f63/9457485/fe3fbf9d7b6d/jcm-11-05200-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验