Stancu Cristina, Dębski Dawid, Michalak Jacek
Ceprocim S.A., 6, Blvd. Preciziei, Sector 6, 062203 Bucharest, Romania.
Research and Development Center, Atlas sp. z o.o., 2, Kilińskiego St., 91-421 Lodz, Poland.
Materials (Basel). 2022 Sep 5;15(17):6167. doi: 10.3390/ma15176167.
This article presents the results of the interlaboratory comparison (ILC) study of the following four characteristics of ceramic tile adhesives (CTAs): initial tensile adhesion strength, tensile adhesion strength after heat ageing, tensile adhesion strength after immersion in water, and tensile adhesion strength after freeze-thaw cycles. The results showed that the objective of the ILC was achieved-the z-score analysis carried out following ISO 13528 allowed for classifying all results obtained by 23 laboratories out of 27 as satisfactory. The results of the remaining four laboratories were rated worse. Despite the achieved goal, the ILC notes high heterogeneity of the results in terms of failure patterns, as well as significant differences between the lowest and the highest values of tensile adhesion strength for various measurement conditions. The results of the ILC were discussed in terms of the possibility of including them in the risk analysis conducted by the manufacturer. The results of the ILC are also valuable information for market surveillance authorities, who, in the authors' opinion, should be more cautious about results on samples taken from the market. The ILC results for CTAs are also a valuable recommendation for a possible revision of EN 12004.
本文介绍了瓷砖胶粘剂(CTA)以下四个特性的实验室间比对(ILC)研究结果:初始拉伸粘结强度、热老化后的拉伸粘结强度、浸水后的拉伸粘结强度以及冻融循环后的拉伸粘结强度。结果表明,ILC的目标得以实现——按照ISO 13528进行的z分数分析能够将27个实验室中的23个实验室所获得的所有结果评定为满意。其余四个实验室的结果评定较差。尽管实现了目标,但ILC指出,在失效模式方面结果存在高度异质性,并且在各种测量条件下,拉伸粘结强度的最低值和最高值之间存在显著差异。就将ILC结果纳入制造商进行的风险分析的可能性进行了讨论。ILC结果对于市场监管当局而言也是有价值的信息,作者认为,市场监管当局对于从市场抽取的样品的结果应更加谨慎。CTA的ILC结果对于EN 12004的可能修订也是一项有价值的建议。