Michalak Jacek, Ziomek Radosław
Research and Development Center, Atlas sp. z o.o., 2 Kilińskiego St., 91-421 Lodz, Poland.
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jun 8;16(12):4245. doi: 10.3390/ma16124245.
The paper presents the results of tensile adhesion strength measurements of ceramic tile adhesive (CTA) stored in various conditions performed by ten operators in one laboratory using the same equipment and auxiliary materials. The obtained results allowed the authors to estimate the repeatability and reproducibility of the tensile adhesion strength measurement method using the methodology following ISO 5725-2:1994+AC1:2002. Standard deviations of repeatability ranging from 0.09 to 0.15 for the general means value in the range of 0.89-1.76 MPa and standard deviations of reproducibility ranging from 0.14 to 0.21 for the same general means content indicate that the accuracy of tensile adhesion strength measurement method is not high enough. From the group of ten operators, five perform tensile adhesion strength measurements daily, the remaining five perform other measures, and the results obtained by professionals and non-professionals showed no significant differences. In light of the obtained results, compliance assessment with this method with the criteria set out in the harmonized standard EN 12004:2007+A1:2012 carried out by different operators may be divergent, and there is a significant risk of incorrect assessments. This risk is additionally increasing in the case of the evaluation conducted by market surveillance authorities, which use the simple acceptance rule that does not consider measurement variability.
本文介绍了在一个实验室中,由十名操作人员使用相同设备和辅助材料,对存储在不同条件下的瓷砖胶粘剂(CTA)进行拉伸粘结强度测量的结果。所得结果使作者能够使用遵循ISO 5725-2:1994+AC1:2002的方法来估计拉伸粘结强度测量方法的重复性和再现性。对于0.89-1.76MPa范围内的一般平均值,重复性标准偏差范围为0.09至0.15,对于相同的一般平均值含量,再现性标准偏差范围为0.14至0.21,这表明拉伸粘结强度测量方法的准确性不够高。在十名操作人员中,五人每天进行拉伸粘结强度测量,其余五人进行其他测量,专业人员和非专业人员获得的结果没有显著差异。根据所得结果,不同操作人员按照协调标准EN 12004:2007+A1:2012中规定的标准对该方法进行的符合性评估可能会有差异,并且存在评估错误的重大风险。在市场监督机构进行评估的情况下,这种风险会进一步增加,因为市场监督机构使用的简单验收规则没有考虑测量的变异性。