Suppr超能文献

基于可穿戴设备的爬楼梯功率估计和活动分类。

Wearable-Based Stair Climb Power Estimation and Activity Classification.

机构信息

Pfizer Inc., 610 Main Street, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2022 Sep 1;22(17):6600. doi: 10.3390/s22176600.

Abstract

Stair climb power (SCP) is a clinical measure of leg muscular function assessed in-clinic via the Stair Climb Power Test (SCPT). This method is subject to human error and cannot provide continuous remote monitoring. Continuous monitoring using wearable sensors may provide a more comprehensive assessment of lower-limb muscular function. In this work, we propose an algorithm to classify stair climbing periods and estimate SCP from a lower-back worn accelerometer, which strongly agrees with the clinical standard (r = 0.92, p < 0.001; ICC = 0.90, [0.82, 0.94]). Data were collected in-lab from healthy adults (n = 65) performing the four-step SCPT and a walking assessment while instrumented (accelerometer + gyroscope), which allowed us to investigate tradeoffs between sensor modalities. Using two classifiers, we were able to identify periods of stair ascent with >89% accuracy [sensitivity = >0.89, specificity = >0.90] using two ensemble machine learning algorithms, trained on accelerometer signal features. Minimal changes in model performances were observed using the gyroscope alone (±0−6% accuracy) versus the accelerometer model. While we observed a slight increase in accuracy when combining gyroscope and accelerometer (about +3−6% accuracy), this is tolerable to preserve battery life in the at-home environment. This work is impactful as it shows potential for an accelerometer-based at-home assessment of SCP.

摘要

楼梯爬升功率(SCP)是一种通过楼梯爬升功率测试(SCPT)在诊所评估的腿部肌肉功能的临床测量方法。这种方法容易出现人为错误,无法提供连续的远程监测。使用可穿戴传感器进行连续监测可能会更全面地评估下肢肌肉功能。在这项工作中,我们提出了一种从背部佩戴的加速度计中分类楼梯爬升阶段并估算 SCP 的算法,该算法与临床标准(r = 0.92,p < 0.001;ICC = 0.90,[0.82,0.94])高度一致。数据是在实验室中从健康成年人(n = 65)在佩戴仪器(加速度计+陀螺仪)进行四步 SCPT 和步行评估时收集的,这使我们能够研究传感器模式之间的权衡。使用两种分类器,我们能够使用两种集成机器学习算法,基于加速度计信号特征,以>89%的准确率识别楼梯上升阶段[灵敏度>0.89,特异性>0.90]。仅使用陀螺仪时,模型性能的变化极小(准确性±0-6%),而与加速度计模型相比。当我们将陀螺仪和加速度计结合使用时,准确性略有提高(约+3-6%的准确性),这可以在家庭环境中保持电池寿命。这项工作具有影响力,因为它显示了基于加速度计的在家中进行 SCP 评估的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6529/9459813/c9051589006c/sensors-22-06600-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验