Suppr超能文献

共享决策有助于新诊断的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者选择吸入器:一项多中心前瞻性研究。

Shared Decision-Making Facilitates Inhaler Choice in Patients with Newly-Diagnosed Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Multicenter Prospective Study.

机构信息

Division of General Chest Medicine, Department of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Sep 2;17:2067-2078. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S376547. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Inadequate inhaler technique and nonadherence to therapy are associated with poorer clinical outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Shared decision-making (SDM), based on clinical evidence, patient goals and preferences, improves quality of care. This study aims to investigate the initial patients' choices of inhaler devices in patients with newly-diagnosed COPD after an SDM process.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective, observational, multi-center study in four hospitals in Taiwan from December 2019 to July 2021. All treatment-naïve patients with newly-diagnosed COPD who were able to use three different inhalers of dual bronchodilators (Respimat, Ellipta, and Breezhaler) in the outpatient setting were enrolled. After an SDM process, every patient was prescribed with one inhaler chosen by him- or herself. Errors of using inhalers were recorded after prescription of the inhaler, and at the follow-up visit a month later. The patients' adherence, satisfaction score, and willingness to keep the initially chosen inhaler were investigated.

RESULTS

In 109 enrolled patients, 43, 45, and 21 patients chose Respimat, Ellipta, and Breezhaler, respectively. Patients chose different inhalers had similar rates of critical error on both visits, while the rates greatly decrease on the follow-up visit, no matter which inhaler devices they chose initially. The majority of patients had good adherence (use as the prescription daily, n = 79, 82%), satisfaction (satisfaction score ≥4, n = 70, 73%), and strong willingness to keep the initial inhaler (n = 89, 93%) on the follow-up visit regardless of disease severity and their comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

SDM might facilitate inhaler choosing, reduce inhaler errors (versus baseline) with good adherence, satisfaction and strong willingness to keep the initial inhaler in patients with newly-diagnosed COPD.

摘要

目的

在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)中,吸入器技术不足和治疗不依从与临床结局较差有关。基于临床证据、患者目标和偏好的共同决策(SDM)可提高护理质量。本研究旨在调查在 SDM 流程后,新诊断为 COPD 的患者对吸入器设备的初始选择。

患者和方法

我们在台湾的四家医院进行了一项前瞻性、观察性、多中心研究,时间为 2019 年 12 月至 2021 年 7 月。所有在门诊环境中能够使用三种不同的双支气管扩张剂(Respimat、Ellipta 和 Breezhaler)的新诊断为 COPD 的未经治疗的患者均纳入研究。在 SDM 流程后,每位患者都根据自己的意愿选择了一种吸入器。在处方吸入器后和一个月后的随访中记录使用吸入器的错误。调查了患者的依从性、满意度评分和继续使用最初选择的吸入器的意愿。

结果

在纳入的 109 名患者中,分别有 43、45 和 21 名患者选择了 Respimat、Ellipta 和 Breezhaler。在两次就诊中,选择不同吸入器的患者发生严重错误的比率相似,而无论他们最初选择哪种吸入器设备,在随访就诊时,错误率均大大降低。大多数患者在随访就诊时具有良好的依从性(按处方每天使用,n=79,82%)、满意度(满意度评分≥4,n=70,73%)和强烈的保留初始吸入器的意愿(n=89,93%),无论疾病严重程度和合并症如何。

结论

SDM 可能有助于选择吸入器,减少吸入器错误(与基线相比),并提高新诊断为 COPD 的患者的依从性、满意度和强烈保留初始吸入器的意愿。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7bd/9448347/f142febb87a4/COPD-17-2067-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验