Medical College of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Milwaukee.
Center for Advancing Population Science, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2230853. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.30853.
Few studies have examined the association between social risk factors and poor control of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors.
To examine the sequential association between social risk domains and CVD risk control over time in older adults with diabetes.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study analyzed core interviews from 4877 US adults with diabetes who were participating in the Health and Retirement Study, a national longitudinal survey of US adults. Participants were older than 50 years, completed the social risk domain questions, and had data on CVD risk factor measures from January 2006 to December 2016. Data were analyzed from June to July 2022.
Five social risk domains were created: (1) economic stability, (2) neighborhood or built environment, (3) education access, (4) health care access, and (5) social or community context.
The 4 primary outcomes were (1) poor glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] level ≥8.0%), (2) poor blood pressure (BP) control (systolic BP≥140 mm Hg and diastolic BP ≥90 mm Hg), (3) poor cholesterol control (total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein ratio ≥5), and (4) a composite of poor CVD risk control (≥2 poorly controlled glucose level, BP, or cholesterol level).
Among this cohort of 4877 older adults with diabetes (mean [SD] age, 68.6 [9.8] years; 2715 women [55.7%]), 890 participants (18.3%) had an HbA1c level of 8% or higher, 774 (15.9%) had systolic BP of 140 mm Hg or higher and diastolic BP of 90 mm Hg or higher, 962 (19.7%) had total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein ratio of 5 or higher, and 437 (9.0%) had at least 2 poorly controlled CVD risk factors. Neighborhood or built environment (ie, adverse social support) was independently associated with poor glycemic control (odds ratio [OR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.06-1.63), whereas economic stability (ie, medication cost-related nonadherence) (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.04-1.87) and health care access (ie, lack of health insurance) (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.20-2.09) were independently associated with poor BP control after full adjustment. Education access (ie, lack of education) (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.01-1.52) and health care access (ie, lack of health insurance) (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.02-1.68) were independently associated with poor cholesterol control. Health care access (ie, lack of health insurance) was the only social risk domain that was independently associated with having at least 2 poorly controlled CVD risk factors (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.26-2.37).
Results of this study suggest that certain social risk domains are associated with control of CVD risk factors over time. Interventions targeting domains, such as neighborhood or built environment, economic stability, and education access, may be beneficial to controlling CVD risk factors in older adults with diabetes.
很少有研究探讨社会风险因素与心血管疾病(CVD)风险因素控制不良之间的关系。
研究在患有糖尿病的老年人中,随着时间的推移,社会风险领域与 CVD 风险控制之间的顺序关系。
设计、地点和参与者:本队列研究分析了来自参加美国健康与退休研究的 4877 名年龄大于 50 岁的美国成年人的核心访谈,该研究是一项针对美国成年人的全国性纵向调查。参与者完成了社会风险领域的问题,并且在 2006 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月期间有 CVD 风险因素测量的数据。数据于 2022 年 6 月至 7 月进行了分析。
创建了五个社会风险领域:(1)经济稳定性,(2)邻里或建筑环境,(3)教育机会,(4)医疗保健机会,(5)社会或社区环境。
四项主要结果是(1)血糖控制不良(糖化血红蛋白[HbA1c]水平≥8.0%),(2)血压控制不良(收缩压≥140mmHg 和舒张压≥90mmHg),(3)胆固醇控制不良(总胆固醇/高密度脂蛋白比值≥5),以及(4)CVD 风险控制不良的综合指标(≥2 项血糖、血压或胆固醇水平控制不良)。
在这一队列中有 4877 名患有糖尿病的老年人(平均[标准差]年龄,68.6[9.8]岁;2715 名女性[55.7%]),890 名参与者(18.3%)的 HbA1c 水平为 8%或更高,774 名(15.9%)的收缩压为 140mmHg 或更高,舒张压为 90mmHg 或更高,962 名(19.7%)的总胆固醇/高密度脂蛋白比值为 5 或更高,437 名(9.0%)有至少 2 项 CVD 风险因素控制不良。邻里或建筑环境(即不良的社会支持)与血糖控制不良独立相关(比值比[OR],1.31;95%置信区间[CI],1.06-1.63),而经济稳定性(即药物费用相关的不依从性)(OR,1.40;95%CI,1.04-1.87)和医疗保健机会(即缺乏医疗保险)(OR,1.58;95%CI,1.20-2.09)在充分调整后与血压控制不良独立相关。教育机会(即缺乏教育)(OR,1.24;95%CI,1.01-1.52)和医疗保健机会(即缺乏医疗保险)(OR,1.31;95%CI,1.02-1.68)与胆固醇控制不良独立相关。医疗保健机会(即缺乏医疗保险)是唯一与至少 2 项 CVD 风险因素控制不良独立相关的社会风险领域(OR,1.72;95%CI,1.26-2.37)。
这项研究的结果表明,某些社会风险领域与 CVD 风险因素的控制随时间而变化有关。针对特定领域(如邻里或建筑环境、经济稳定性和教育机会)的干预措施可能有助于控制患有糖尿病的老年人的 CVD 风险因素。