Suppr超能文献

应用乙醇固定系统提高基于细针抽吸细胞学诊断胰腺病变的准确性:一项符合 STROBE 规范的研究。

Increased accuracy of FNA-based cytological diagnosis of pancreatic lesions by use of an ethanol-based fixative system: A STROBE compliant study.

机构信息

Clinic for Internal Medicine IV (Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases), Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.

Clinic for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 9;101(36):e30449. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030449.

Abstract

EUS-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNA) is the gold standard of evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions. However, accuracy is generally low. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic yield of conventional cytology (CC) with liquid-based cytological analysis using an ethanol based fixative system (LBC) without onsite cytopathological assessment. We performed a retrospective evaluation in patients referred to the Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy at Jena University Hospital for FNA of pancreatic masses between 2008 and 2015. LBC preservation of specimen was introduced in April 2011. Gold standard was defined as a surgically obtained histology or a patient follow-up of at least 1 year for diagnosis or exclusion of malignancy. 172 patients were included into the final analysis. Mean age was 64.8 years (SD 12.4 years), 105 patients were male. 107 lesions were malignant, while 65 lesions were benign. 89 specimens were evaluated by CC, whereas 83 specimens were processed by LBC. Liquid-based cytology performed significantly better than conventional cytology in terms of sensitivity (87.8% vs 67.2% (P = .021)), specificity (100% vs 87.1% (P = .047)) negative predictive value (NPV) (85% vs 58.7% (P = .009)) and accuracy (92.8% vs 74.2% (P = .001)). We observed no learning curve after implementation of LBC Liquid based cytology is a simple and inexpensive technique that helps improving sensitivity, specificity, NPV and accuracy over conventional cytology in fine needle aspirates from patients with pancreatic lesions. Therefore, this real-world evidence shows, that EUS-FNA specimen processing should be performed using LBC to achieve best possible results.

摘要

超声内镜引导下细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNA)是评估实体胰腺病变的金标准。然而,其准确性通常较低。本研究旨在比较传统细胞学(CC)与使用基于乙醇的固定系统(LBC)的液基细胞学分析在未经现场细胞学评估的情况下对胰腺肿块进行 FNA 的诊断率。我们对 2008 年至 2015 年间因胰腺肿块接受耶拿大学医院多学科内镜科 FNA 的患者进行了回顾性评估。2011 年 4 月引入了 LBC 标本保存。金标准定义为通过手术获得的组织学或对患者进行至少 1 年的随访以诊断或排除恶性肿瘤。最终分析纳入 172 例患者。平均年龄为 64.8 岁(标准差 12.4 岁),男性 105 例。107 个病灶为恶性,65 个病灶为良性。89 个标本通过 CC 进行评估,83 个标本通过 LBC 进行处理。液基细胞学在敏感性(87.8%对 67.2%(P=0.021))、特异性(100%对 87.1%(P=0.047))、阴性预测值(NPV)(85%对 58.7%(P=0.009))和准确性(92.8%对 74.2%(P=0.001))方面明显优于传统细胞学。在实施 LBC 后,我们没有观察到学习曲线。液基细胞学是一种简单且经济实惠的技术,有助于提高敏感性、特异性、NPV 和准确性,优于传统细胞学在胰腺病变患者的细针抽吸物中。因此,这一真实世界的证据表明,EUS-FNA 标本处理应使用 LBC 进行,以获得最佳结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验