Servicio de Cardiología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago, Spain.
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago, Spain.
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Dec;9(6):4150-4159. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14134. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
e-consults are asynchronous, clinician-to-clinician exchanges that answer focused, non-urgent, patient-specific questions using the electronic medical record. We instituted an e-consultation programme (2013-2019) for all general practitioners (GPs) referrals to cardiologists that preceded patients' in-person consultations when considered. In our study, we aimed to analyse the clinical characteristics, 1 year prognosis and the prognostic determinants of patients with a previous diagnosis of HF referred for an e-consult, categorized by their previous HF-related hospitalization status (recent hospitalization, <1 year before; remote hospitalization, >1 year before or never been hospitalized because of HF), and to analyse the impact of reducing the time elapsed between e-consultation and response by the cardiologist in terms of prognosis.
Epidemiological and clinical data were obtained from 4851 HF patients referred by GPs to the cardiology department for an e-consultation 2013 and 2020. The delay of time to e-consults were solved was 8.6 + 8.6 days with 84.3% solved in <14 days. For the 1 year prognosis evaluation after the e-consult were assessed the cardiovascular hospitalizations, HF-related hospitalizations, HF-related mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality. Compared with the group without a previous hospitalization, patients with recent and remote HF hospitalization were at higher risk of a new HF-related hospitalization (OR: 19.41 [95% CI: 12.95-29.11]; OR: 8.44 [95% CI: 5.14-13.87], respectively), HF-related mortality (OR: 2.47 [95% CI: 1.43-4.27]; OR: 1.25 [95% CI: 0.51-3.06], respectively), as well as cardiovascular hospitalizations and mortality and all-cause mortality. Reduction in the time elapsed because e-consultation was solved was associated with lower risk of HF-related mortality (OR: 0.94 [95% CI: 0.89-0.99]), cardiovascular mortality (OR: 0.96 [95% CI: 0.93-0.98]), and all-cause mortality (OR: 0.98 [95% CI: 0.97-1.00]).
A clinician-to-clinician e-consultation programme between GPs and cardiologists in patients with HF allows to solve the demand of care in around 25% e-consults without an in-person consultation; the patients with a previous history of HF-related hospitalization showed a worse 1 year outcome. A reduction in the time elapsed because e-consultation was solved was associated with a mortality reduction.
电子咨询是一种异步的临床医生间交流,使用电子病历回答集中、非紧急、针对特定患者的问题。我们为所有转介给心脏病专家的普通科医生设立了电子咨询计划(2013-2019 年),该计划在患者进行面对面咨询之前进行,如果认为有必要的话。在我们的研究中,我们旨在分析有先前心力衰竭诊断的患者的临床特征、1 年预后和预后决定因素,这些患者根据其先前与心力衰竭相关的住院情况进行分类(最近住院,<1 年前;远程住院,>1 年前或从未因心力衰竭住院),并分析通过减少心脏病专家对电子咨询的响应时间对预后的影响。
从 2013 年和 2020 年由普通科医生转介给心脏病科进行电子咨询的 4851 例心力衰竭患者中获得了流行病学和临床数据。通过电子咨询解决的时间延迟解决了 8.6+8.6 天,84.3%在<14 天内解决。对于电子咨询后 1 年的预后评估,评估了心血管住院、心力衰竭相关住院、心力衰竭相关死亡、心血管死亡和全因死亡。与没有先前住院史的患者相比,最近和远程心力衰竭住院的患者有更高的新发心力衰竭相关住院风险(OR:19.41 [95%CI:12.95-29.11];OR:8.44 [95%CI:5.14-13.87]),心力衰竭相关死亡率(OR:2.47 [95%CI:1.43-4.27];OR:1.25 [95%CI:0.51-3.06]),以及心血管住院和死亡率以及全因死亡率。由于电子咨询得到解决而减少的时间与心力衰竭相关死亡率(OR:0.94 [95%CI:0.89-0.99])、心血管死亡率(OR:0.96 [95%CI:0.93-0.98])和全因死亡率(OR:0.98 [95%CI:0.97-1.00])的风险降低相关。
普通科医生和心脏病专家之间的电子咨询计划可解决大约 25%的电子咨询的医疗需求,而无需进行面对面咨询;有心力衰竭相关住院史的患者 1 年预后较差。由于电子咨询得到解决而减少的时间与死亡率降低有关。