• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性政治代表性与性别健康差距:对 49 个欧洲国家的跨国分析。

Female political representation and the gender health gap: a cross-national analysis of 49 European countries.

机构信息

Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

International Inequalities Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2022 Oct 3;32(5):684-689. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac122.

DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckac122
PMID:36087336
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9527963/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Does increased female participation in the social and political life of a country improve health? Social participation may improve health because it ensures that the concerns of all people are heard by key decision-makers. More specifically, when women's social participation increases this may lead to health gains because women are more likely to vote for leaders and lobby for policies that will enhance the health of everyone. This article tries to examine whether female participation is correlated with measures of health inequality.

METHODS

We draw on data from the World Health Organization Health Equity Status Report initiative and the Varieties of Democracy project to assess whether health is better and health inequalities are smaller in countries where female political representation is greater.

RESULTS

We find consistent evidence that greater female political representation is associated with lower geographical inequalities in infant mortality, smaller inequalities in self-reported health (for both women and men) and fewer disability-adjusted life-years lost for women and men. Finally, we find that greater female political representation is not only correlated with better health for men and women but is also correlated with a smaller gap between men and women because men seem to experience better health in such contexts.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater female political representation is associated with better health for everyone and smaller inequalities.

摘要

背景

女性更多地参与国家的社会和政治生活是否会改善健康状况?社会参与可能会改善健康状况,因为它确保了所有利益相关者的关切都能被决策者听到。更具体地说,当女性的社会参与度增加时,这可能会带来健康收益,因为女性更有可能投票支持那些能够提升所有人健康的领导人,并游说制定相关政策。本文试图检验女性参与度是否与健康不平等的衡量标准相关。

方法

我们借鉴了世界卫生组织健康公平状况报告倡议和民主多样性项目的数据,以评估女性政治代表比例较高的国家,其健康状况是否更好,健康不平等程度是否更小。

结果

我们发现了一致的证据表明,女性政治代表比例越高,婴儿死亡率的地域不平等程度越低,自我报告的健康状况(无论是女性还是男性)不平等程度越低,女性和男性因残疾而丧失的健康调整生命年数也越少。最后,我们发现,女性政治代表比例的增加不仅与男性和女性的健康状况改善有关,而且与两性之间的差距缩小有关,因为在这种情况下,男性的健康状况似乎也有所改善。

结论

女性政治代表比例越高,所有人的健康状况就越好,不平等程度就越低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ee4/9527963/365f7da7a9e9/ckac122f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ee4/9527963/ed6683130f49/ckac122f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ee4/9527963/3343bf2236fb/ckac122f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ee4/9527963/365f7da7a9e9/ckac122f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ee4/9527963/ed6683130f49/ckac122f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ee4/9527963/3343bf2236fb/ckac122f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ee4/9527963/365f7da7a9e9/ckac122f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Female political representation and the gender health gap: a cross-national analysis of 49 European countries.女性政治代表性与性别健康差距:对 49 个欧洲国家的跨国分析。
Eur J Public Health. 2022 Oct 3;32(5):684-689. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac122.
2
Can inequalities in political participation explain health inequalities?政治参与不平等能否解释健康不平等?
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Aug;234:112371. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112371. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
3
Gender Norms and Gender Equality in Full-Time Employment and Health: A 97-Country Analysis of the World Values Survey.全职就业与健康方面的性别规范和性别平等:对世界价值观调查中97个国家的分析。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 31;13:689815. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.689815. eCollection 2022.
4
Gender and the Politics of Death: Female Representation, Political and Developmental Context, and Population Health in a Cross-National Panel.性别与死亡政治:跨国面板中的女性代表性、政治和发展背景与人口健康
Demography. 2018 Oct;55(5):1905-1934. doi: 10.1007/s13524-018-0697-0.
5
Social, economic, and political events affect gender equity in China, Nepal, and Nicaragua: a matched, interrupted time-series study.社会、经济和政治事件影响中国、尼泊尔和尼加拉瓜的性别平等:一项配对、中断时间序列研究。
Glob Health Action. 2020;13(1):1712147. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1712147.
6
Women and political representation.
Manushi. 1999 May-Jun(112):33-5.
7
Women's status and the health of women and men: a view from the States.妇女地位与妇女和男子的健康:来自美国的视角。
Soc Sci Med. 1999 Jan;48(1):21-32. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00286-x.
8
Analyzing differences in the magnitude of socioeconomic inequalities in self-perceived health by countries of different political tradition in Europe.分析欧洲不同政治传统国家在自我认知健康方面社会经济不平等程度的差异。
Int J Health Serv. 2009;39(2):321-41. doi: 10.2190/HS.39.2.f.
9
The influence of gender equality policies on gender inequalities in health in Europe.欧洲性别平等政策对健康领域性别不平等的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Sep;117:25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.018. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
10
Reframing inequality? The health inequalities turn as a dangerous frame shift.重新构建不平等?健康不平等的转变是一个危险的框架转移。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2017 Dec 1;39(4):653-660. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdw140.

引用本文的文献

1
Generating political priority for breastfeeding and the adoption of Kenya's 2012 BMS act: the importance of women's leadership.为母乳喂养争取政治优先权及肯尼亚2012年《母乳代用品销售法》的通过:妇女领导力的重要性
Global Health. 2025 May 29;21(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12992-025-01127-2.
2
Understanding the Relationship Between Gender Representation in County Government and Perinatal Outcomes to Black, White, and Hispanic Birthing People in Georgia.了解佐治亚州县政府中性别代表情况与黑人、白人及西班牙裔分娩人群围产期结局之间的关系。
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024 Mar 12;5(1):201-210. doi: 10.1089/whr.2023.0158. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Is health politically irrelevant? Experimental evidence during a global pandemic.健康在政治上是否无关紧要?大流行期间的实验证据。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004222. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
2
Achieving health equity: democracy matters.实现健康公平:民主至关重要。
Lancet. 2019 Nov 2;394(10209):1600-1601. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32128-2. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
3
Can inequalities in political participation explain health inequalities?政治参与不平等能否解释健康不平等?
Realising the right to participate in pandemic prevention, preparedness and response and beyond.
实现参与大流行预防、防范和应对及其他相关事务的权利。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Jan;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-011689.
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Aug;234:112371. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112371. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
4
The relationships between democratic experience, adult health, and cause-specific mortality in 170 countries between 1980 and 2016: an observational analysis.1980 年至 2016 年期间 170 个国家的民主经验、成年人健康与特定病因死亡率之间的关系:一项观察性分析。
Lancet. 2019 Apr 20;393(10181):1628-1640. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30235-1. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
5
Child Health and Household Resources in South Africa: Evidence from the Old Age Pension Program.南非的儿童健康与家庭资源:来自老年养老金计划的证据
Am Econ Rev. 2000;90(2):393-8. doi: 10.1257/aer.90.2.393.
6
The Happiest Kids on Earth. Gender Equality and Adolescent Life Satisfaction in Europe and North America.《地球上最幸福的孩子》。欧美国家的性别平等与青少年生活满意度。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 May;47(5):1073-1085. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0756-7. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
7
Political gender inequality and infant mortality in the United States, 1990-2012.1990 - 2012年美国的政治性别不平等与婴儿死亡率
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Jun;182:127-135. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.024. Epub 2017 Apr 14.
8
Suicidality, Economic Shocks, and Egalitarian Gender Norms.自杀倾向、经济冲击与平等主义性别规范。
Eur Sociol Rev. 2016 Feb 1;32(1):39-53. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcv084.
9
Association between gender inequality index and child mortality rates: a cross-national study of 138 countries.性别不平等指数与儿童死亡率之间的关联:一项对138个国家的跨国研究。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Mar 9;15:97. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1449-3.
10
Trends in Global Gender Inequality (Forthcoming, Social Forces).全球性别不平等趋势(即将发表于《社会力量》)
Soc Forces. 2010 Jul 1;88(5):1941-1968. doi: 10.1353/sof.2010.0040.