Wamahiu Maryanne, Baker Phillip, Dorlach Tim
Faculty of Life Sciences: Food, Nutrition and Health, University of Bayreuth, Kulmbach, Germany.
Bayreuth International Graduate School of African Studies, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
Global Health. 2025 May 29;21(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12992-025-01127-2.
The World Health Organization recommends initiating breastfeeding in the first hour of life, exclusive breastfeeding for six months, and continued breastfeeding for at least two years. Aggressive marketing of breast milk substitutes (BMS) undermines breastfeeding and is linked to adverse child and maternal health outcomes. This is particularly problematic in the Global South, where socioeconomic conditions often amplify the risks associated with BMS. The adoption of national BMS legislation in line with the 1981 International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes is therefore crucial but difficult due to strong opposition from the transnational formula milk industry. Breastfeeding advocates in Kenya were able to overcome this powerful opposition when the country adopted a strict BMS Act in 2012, which has since facilitated and protected remarkable improvements in breastfeeding rates. We conduct a qualitative case study to identify the political enablers of the successful adoption of this important law.
BMS legislation was first politically debated in Kenya in the 1980s following mobilization of women-led civil society organizations, namely the Breastfeeding Information Group and the Maendeleo ya Wanawake Organization. The issue re-emerged on the political agenda in the 2000s but faced opposition from the transnational formula milk industry. Kenya's BMS Act was ultimately adopted during a policy window opened by a constitutional reform. Support for the adoption of this landmark law was led by effective female political leaders, including public health minister Beth Mugo, the ministry's nutrition division head Terrie Wefwafwa, and members of the Kenya Women's Parliamentary Association. In the formulation and adoption of the law, these female leaders received important support from international organizations, such as the United Nations Children's Fund, as well as from powerful male allies, including president Mwai Kibaki.
The Kenyan case illustrates how women's political leadership can counteract the power of the transnational formula milk industry and help achieve strict BMS legislation. Effective female leadership for BMS legislation can occur in various political offices and positions, including those of ministers, legislators and bureaucrats. Female leaders can leverage their own influence by strategically exploiting policy windows and recruiting male allies.
世界卫生组织建议在婴儿出生后一小时内开始母乳喂养,纯母乳喂养六个月,并持续母乳喂养至少两年。母乳代用品的大力营销破坏了母乳喂养,并与不良的儿童和孕产妇健康结果相关。这在全球南方地区尤其成问题,因为那里的社会经济状况往往会放大与母乳代用品相关的风险。因此,根据1981年《母乳代用品销售国际守则》通过国家母乳代用品立法至关重要,但由于跨国配方奶粉行业的强烈反对而困难重重。肯尼亚的母乳喂养倡导者在该国于2012年通过一项严格的母乳代用品法案时,成功克服了这一强大阻力,自那以后,该法案促进并保护了母乳喂养率的显著提高。我们进行了一项定性案例研究,以确定成功通过这项重要法律的政治推动因素。
在以妇女为主导的民间社会组织,即母乳喂养信息小组和马恩德莱奥·亚·瓦纳瓦克组织动员之后,肯尼亚于20世纪80年代首次就母乳代用品立法展开政治辩论。该问题在21世纪再次出现在政治议程上,但遭到了跨国配方奶粉行业的反对。肯尼亚的母乳代用品法案最终在宪法改革开启的政策窗口期间获得通过。对通过这项具有里程碑意义的法律的支持由有效的女性政治领导人引领,包括公共卫生部长贝丝·穆戈、该部营养司司长特里·韦夫瓦法以及肯尼亚妇女议会协会成员。在该法律的制定和通过过程中,这些女性领导人得到了国际组织(如联合国儿童基金会)以及包括姆瓦伊·齐贝吉总统在内的有影响力的男性盟友的重要支持。
肯尼亚的案例说明了女性政治领导力如何能够抗衡跨国配方奶粉行业的势力,并有助于实现严格的母乳代用品立法。对母乳代用品立法而言,有效的女性领导力可以出现在各种政治职位上,包括部长、立法者和官僚的职位。女性领导人可以通过战略性地利用政策窗口和争取男性盟友来发挥自身影响力。