• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃癌术后化疗周期<9或化疗周期≥9的预后列线图,以辅助术后化疗治疗决策。

Prognostic nomograms for gastric carcinoma after surgery to assist decision-making for postoperative treatment with chemotherapy cycles <9 or chemotherapy cycles ≥9.

作者信息

Li Yifan, Zhang Xiaojuan

机构信息

Second Department of General Surgery, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital, Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.

Radiology Department, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital, Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2022 Aug 26;9:916483. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.916483. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2022.916483
PMID:36090344
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9458925/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We sought to develop novel nomograms to accurately predict overall survival (OS) of chemotherapy cycles <9 and chemotherapy cycles ≥9 and construct risk stratification to differentiate low-risk and high-risk of two cohorts.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative-intent resection for gastric cancer between January 2002 and May 2020 at a single China institution were identified. Variables associated with OS were recorded and analyzed according to multivariable Cox models. Nomograms predicting 3- and 5-year OS were built according to variables resulting from multivariable Cox models. Discrimination ability was calculated using the Harrell's Concordance Index. The constructed nomogram was subjected to 1,000 resamples bootstrap for internal validation. Calibration curves for the new nomograms were used to test the consistency between the predicted and actual 3- and 5-year OS. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to assess the clinical net benefit. The Concordance index (C-index) and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (t-ROC) curves were used to evaluate and compare the discriminative abilities of the new nomograms. Finally, prognostic risk stratification of gastric cancer was conducted with X-tile software and nomograms converted into a risk-stratified prognosis model.

RESULTS

For the nomogram predict OS of chemotherapy cycles <9, C-index was 0.711 (95% CI, 0.663-0.760) in internal validation and 0.722 (95% CI, 0.662-0.783) in external validation, which was better than AJCC 8th edition TNM staging (internal validation: 0.627, 95% CI, 0.585-0.670) and (external validation: 0.595,95% CI, 0.543-0.648). The C-index of the nomogram for chemotherapy cycles ≥9 in internal validation was 0.755 (95% CI, 0.728-0.782) and 0.785 (95% CI, 0.747-0.823) in external validation, which was superior to the AJCC 8th edition TNM staging (internal validation: 0.712 95% CI, 0.688-0.737) and (external validation 0.734, 95% CI, 0.699-0.770).The calibration curves, t-ROC curves and DCA of the two nomogram models show that the recognition performance of the two nomogram models was outstanding. The statistical differences in the prognosis among the two risk stratification groups further showed that our model had an excellent risk stratification performance.

CONCLUSION

This is first reported risk stratification for chemotherapy cycles of gastric carcinoma. Our proposed nomograms can effectively evaluate postoperative prognosis of patients with different chemotherapy cycles of gastric carcinoma. Chemotherapy cycles ≥9 is therefore recommended for high-risk patients with chemotherapy cycles <9, but not for low-risk patients. Meanwhile, combination with multiple therapies are essential to high-risk patients with chemotherapy cycles ≥9 and unnecessary for low-risk patients.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f4/9458925/60daf779a01a/fsurg-09-916483-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f4/9458925/8126cc93bfa9/fsurg-09-916483-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f4/9458925/88f6a4618a61/fsurg-09-916483-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f4/9458925/567c5c81122a/fsurg-09-916483-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f4/9458925/0db75da450b2/fsurg-09-916483-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f4/9458925/ca53f5fb82c2/fsurg-09-916483-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f4/9458925/60daf779a01a/fsurg-09-916483-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f4/9458925/8126cc93bfa9/fsurg-09-916483-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f4/9458925/88f6a4618a61/fsurg-09-916483-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f4/9458925/567c5c81122a/fsurg-09-916483-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f4/9458925/0db75da450b2/fsurg-09-916483-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f4/9458925/ca53f5fb82c2/fsurg-09-916483-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f4/9458925/60daf779a01a/fsurg-09-916483-g006.jpg
摘要

目的

我们试图开发新的列线图,以准确预测化疗周期<9次和化疗周期≥9次患者的总生存期(OS),并构建风险分层以区分两个队列的低风险和高风险。

方法

确定2002年1月至2020年5月在中国一家机构接受胃癌根治性切除的患者。根据多变量Cox模型记录和分析与OS相关的变量。根据多变量Cox模型得出的变量构建预测3年和5年OS的列线图。使用Harrell一致性指数计算辨别能力。对构建的列线图进行1000次重采样自举以进行内部验证。新列线图的校准曲线用于检验预测的和实际的3年和5年OS之间的一致性。进行决策曲线分析(DCA)以评估临床净效益。一致性指数(C指数)和时间依赖性受试者工作特征(t-ROC)曲线用于评估和比较新列线图的辨别能力。最后,使用X-tile软件对胃癌进行预后风险分层,并将列线图转换为风险分层预后模型。

结果

对于预测化疗周期<9次患者OS的列线图,内部验证中C指数为0.711(95%CI,0.663-0.760),外部验证中为0.722(95%CI,0.662-0.783),优于美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第8版TNM分期(内部验证:0.627,95%CI,0.585-0.670)和(外部验证:0.595,95%CI,0.543-0.648)。化疗周期≥9次患者列线图在内部验证中的C指数为0.755(95%CI,0.728-0.782),外部验证中为0.785(95%CI,0.747-0.823),优于AJCC第8版TNM分期(内部验证:0.712,95%CI,0.688-0.737)和(外部验证:0.734,95%CI,0.699-0.770)。两个列线图模型的校准曲线、t-ROC曲线和DCA表明,两个列线图模型的识别性能出色。两个风险分层组之间预后的统计学差异进一步表明,我们的模型具有出色的风险分层性能。

结论

这是首次报道的胃癌化疗周期风险分层。我们提出的列线图可以有效评估不同化疗周期胃癌患者的术后预后。因此,对于化疗周期<9次的高危患者,建议化疗周期≥9次,但低风险患者不建议。同时,对于化疗周期≥9次的高危患者,联合多种治疗至关重要,而低风险患者则不必要。

相似文献

1
Prognostic nomograms for gastric carcinoma after surgery to assist decision-making for postoperative treatment with chemotherapy cycles <9 or chemotherapy cycles ≥9.胃癌术后化疗周期<9或化疗周期≥9的预后列线图,以辅助术后化疗治疗决策。
Front Surg. 2022 Aug 26;9:916483. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.916483. eCollection 2022.
2
Prognostic nomograms for gastric carcinoma after D2 + total gastrectomy to assist decision-making for postoperative treatment: based on Lasso regression.基于lasso 回归的 D2+全胃切除术后胃癌预后列线图,用于辅助术后治疗决策
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jul 20;21(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03097-4.
3
Screening high-risk individuals for primary gastric carcinoma: evaluating overall survival probability score in the presence and absence of lymphatic metastasis post-gastrectomy.筛查高危人群的原发性胃癌:评估胃切除术后有无淋巴转移的总体生存概率评分。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jul 25;22(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03481-8.
4
[Establishment and validation of a novel nomogram to predict overall survival after radical nephrectomy].[一种预测根治性肾切除术后总生存期的新型列线图的建立与验证]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2023 Aug 23;45(8):681-689. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20221027-00722.
5
Establishment and validation of a postoperative predictive model for patients with colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma.建立并验证结直肠黏液腺癌患者术后预测模型。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct 3;20(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02791-z.
6
Novel nomogram to predict the overall survival of postoperative patients with gastric signet.预测胃印戒细胞癌术后患者总生存的新型列线图
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Aug 16;23(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02915-z.
7
Risk stratification system and web-based nomogram constructed for predicting the overall survival of primary osteosarcoma patients after surgical resection.用于预测原发性骨肉瘤患者手术后总生存期的风险分层系统和基于网络的列线图。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 5;10:949500. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.949500. eCollection 2022.
8
A nomogram model based on the number of examined lymph nodes-related signature to predict prognosis and guide clinical therapy in gastric cancer.基于检查淋巴结数量相关特征的列线图模型预测胃癌的预后并指导临床治疗。
Front Immunol. 2022 Nov 2;13:947802. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.947802. eCollection 2022.
9
Nomogram predicting overall survival of rectal squamous cell carcinomas patients based on the SEER database: A population-based STROBE cohort study.基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库预测直肠鳞状细胞癌患者总生存期的列线图:一项基于人群的加强观察性研究报告(STROBE)队列研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(46):e17916. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017916.
10
A novel postoperative nomogram and risk classification system for individualized estimation of survival among patients with parotid gland carcinoma after surgery.一种新型的术后列线图和风险分类系统,用于个体化评估手术后腮腺癌患者的生存情况。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov;149(16):15127-15141. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05303-y. Epub 2023 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Harnessing the machine learning and nomogram models: elevating prognostication in nonmetastatic gastric cancer with "double invasion" for personalized patient care.利用机器学习和列线图模型:提升伴有“双侵袭”的非转移性胃癌的预后预测,以实现个性化患者护理。
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Jun 23;30(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02761-7.
2
Identifying high-risk candidates for prolonging progression-free survival in primary gastric carcinoma subject to "double invasion": an analytical approach utilizing lasso-cox regression.识别原发性胃癌“双侵袭”中延长无进展生存期的高危候选者:一种利用套索-考克斯回归的分析方法
BMC Cancer. 2025 Feb 28;25(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13810-z.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Postoperative recurrence of gastric cancer depends on whether the chemotherapy cycle was more than 9 cycles: Based on a retrospective and observational study of follow-up within 3 years of 843 patients.胃癌术后复发取决于化疗周期是否超过 9 个周期:基于对 843 例患者 3 年内随访的回顾性观察研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Feb 4;101(5):e28620. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028620.
2
A nomogram to predict risk of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer.用于预测早期胃癌淋巴结转移风险的列线图
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 24;11(1):22873. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02305-z.
3
Development of a Prognostic Nomogram and Nomogram Software Application Tool to Predict Overall Survival and Disease-Free Survival After Curative-Intent Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.
Harnessing Machine Learning and Nomogram Models to Aid in Predicting Progression-Free Survival for Gastric Cancer Patients Post-Gastrectomy with Deficient Mismatch Repair(dMMR).
利用机器学习和列线图模型辅助预测错配修复缺陷(dMMR)的胃癌患者胃切除术后的无进展生存期。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jan 24;25(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13542-0.
4
Screening high-risk individuals for primary gastric carcinoma: evaluating overall survival probability score in the presence and absence of lymphatic metastasis post-gastrectomy.筛查高危人群的原发性胃癌:评估胃切除术后有无淋巴转移的总体生存概率评分。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jul 25;22(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03481-8.
5
Prognostic nomograms for gastric carcinoma after D2 + total gastrectomy to assist decision-making for postoperative treatment: based on Lasso regression.基于lasso 回归的 D2+全胃切除术后胃癌预后列线图,用于辅助术后治疗决策
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jul 20;21(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03097-4.
6
Prognostic effect of excessive chemotherapy cycles for stage II and III gastric cancer patients after D2 + gastrectomy.D2根治性胃切除术后II期和III期胃癌患者化疗周期过多的预后影响
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jan 27;15(1):32-48. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i1.32.
开发一种预后列线图和列线图软件应用工具,以预测胃癌根治性手术后的总生存和无病生存。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Feb;29(2):1220-1229. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10768-7. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
4
External Validation of a Nomogram to Predict Survival and Benefit of Concurrent Chemoradiation for Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.预测II期鼻咽癌同步放化疗生存及获益的列线图的外部验证
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Aug 25;13(17):4286. doi: 10.3390/cancers13174286.
5
A Nomogram for Predicting Risk of Thromboembolism in Gastric Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy.预测接受化疗的胃癌患者血栓栓塞风险的列线图
Front Oncol. 2021 May 26;11:598116. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.598116. eCollection 2021.
6
A Nomogram Predicting Progression Free Survival in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Receiving Sunitinib: Incorporating Pre-Treatment and Post-Treatment Parameters.一种预测接受舒尼替尼治疗的胃肠道间质瘤患者无进展生存期的列线图:纳入治疗前和治疗后参数
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 25;13(11):2587. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112587.
7
Development and Validation of a Novel Nomogram for Individualized Prediction of Survival in Cancer of Unknown Primary.原发灶不明癌患者生存个体化预测的新型列线图的建立与验证
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Jun 15;27(12):3414-3421. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4117. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
8
Appropriate Number of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Cycles for Patients with Stage 2 or 3 Gastric Cancer After Curative Gastrectomy: A Multicenter Cohort Study.根治性胃切除术后Ⅱ期或Ⅲ期胃癌患者辅助化疗周期数的研究:一项多中心队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Aug;28(8):4458-4470. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09504-4. Epub 2021 Jan 10.
9
A novel TNM staging system for gastric cancer based on the metro-ticket paradigm: a comparative study with the AJCC-TNM staging system.基于地铁票范式的胃癌新 TNM 分期系统:与 AJCC-TNM 分期系统的比较研究。
Gastric Cancer. 2019 Jul;22(4):759-768. doi: 10.1007/s10120-018-00904-w. Epub 2019 Jan 5.
10
Is the 8th Edition of the AJCC TNM Staging System Sufficiently Reasonable for All Patients with Noncardia Gastric Cancer? A 12,549-Patient International Database Study.第 8 版 AJCC TNM 分期系统是否对所有非贲门胃癌患者均合理?一项包含 12549 例患者的国际数据库研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul;25(7):2002-2011. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6447-0. Epub 2018 May 3.