• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于检查淋巴结数量相关特征的列线图模型预测胃癌的预后并指导临床治疗。

A nomogram model based on the number of examined lymph nodes-related signature to predict prognosis and guide clinical therapy in gastric cancer.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2022 Nov 2;13:947802. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.947802. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2022.947802
PMID:36405735
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9667298/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increasing evidence suggests that the number of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) is strongly linked to the survivorship of gastric cancer (GC). The goal of this study was to assess the prognostic implications of the ELNs number and to construct an ELNs-based risk signature and nomogram model to predict overall survival (OS) characteristics in GC patients.

METHODS

This inception cohort study included 19,317 GC patients from the U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, who were separated into a training group and an internal validation group. The nomogram was built with the training set, then internally verified with SEER data, and externally validated with two different data sets. Based on the RNA-seq data, ELNs-related DERNAs (DElncRNAs, DEmiRNAs, andDEmRNAs) and immune cells were identified. The LASSO-Cox regression analysis was utilized to construct ELNs-related DERNAs and immune cell prognostic signature in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort. The OS of subgroups with high- and low-ELN signature was compared using the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis. A nomogram was successfully constructed based on the ELNs signature and other clinical characteristics. The concordance index (C-index), calibration plot, receiver operating characteristic curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were all used to evaluate the nomogram model. The meta-analysis, the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis database, and reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) were utilized to validate the RNA expression or abundance of prognostic genes and immune cells between GC tissues and normal gastric tissues, respectively. Finally, we analyzed the correlations between immune checkpoints, chemotherapy drug sensitivity, and risk score.

RESULTS

The multivariate analysis revealed that the high ELNs improved OS compared with low ELNs (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.659, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.626-0.694, p < 0.0001). Using the training set, a nomogram incorporating ELNs was built and proven to have good calibration and discrimination (C-index [95% CI], 0.714 [0.710-0.718]), which was validated in the internal validation set (C-index [95% CI], 0.720 [0.714-0.726]), the TCGA set (C-index [95% CI], 0.693 [0.662-0.724]), and the Chinese set (C-index [95% CI], 0.750 [0.720-0.782]). An ELNs-related signature model based on ELNs group, regulatory T cells (Tregs), neutrophils, CDKN2B-AS1, H19, HOTTIP, LINC00643, MIR663AHG, TMEM236, ZNF705A, and hsa-miR-135a-5p was constructed by the LASSO-Cox regression analysis. The result showed that OS was remarkably lower in patients with high-ELNs signature compared with those with low-ELN signature (HR = 2.418, 95% CI: 1.804-3.241, p < 0.001). This signature performed well in predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival (AUC [95% CI] = 0.688 [0.612-0.763], 0.744 [0.659-0.830], and 0.778 [0.647-0.909], respectively). The multivariate Cox analysis illustrated that the risk score was an independent predictor of survival for patients with GC. Moreover, the expression of prognostic genes (LINC00643, TMEM236, and hsa-miR-135a-5p) displayed differences between GC tissues and adjacent non-tumor tissues. The C-index of the nomogram that can be used to predict the OS of GC patients was 0.710 (95% CI: 0.663-0.753). Both the calibration plots and DCA showed that the nomogram has good predictive performance. Moreover, the signature was significantly correlated with the N stage and T stage. According to our analysis, GC patients in the low-ELN signature group may have a better immunotherapy response and OS outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

We explored the prognostic role of ELNs in GC and successfully constructed an ELNs signature linked to the GC prognosis in TCGA. The findings manifested that the signature is a powerful predictive indicator for patients with GC. The signature might contain potential biomarkers for treatment response prediction for GC patients. Additionally, we identified a novel and robust nomogram combining the characteristics of ELNs and clinical factors for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS in GC patients, which will facilitate personalized survival prediction and aid clinical decision-making in GC patients.

摘要

背景

越来越多的证据表明,淋巴结检查数量(ELNs)与胃癌(GC)患者的生存率密切相关。本研究旨在评估 ELNs 数量的预后意义,并构建基于 ELNs 的风险特征和列线图模型,以预测 GC 患者的总体生存(OS)特征。

方法

这项基于队列的研究纳入了来自美国监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的 19317 名 GC 患者,将其分为训练组和内部验证组。列线图是利用训练集构建的,然后在 SEER 数据中进行内部验证,并在两个不同的数据集上进行外部验证。基于 RNA-seq 数据,鉴定了与 ELNs 相关的 DERNAs(DElncRNAs、DEmiRNAs 和 DEmRNAs)和免疫细胞。利用 LASSO-Cox 回归分析构建了 TCGA 队列中与 ELNs 相关的 DERNAs 和免疫细胞预后特征。使用 Kaplan-Meier(K-M)分析比较高和低 ELN 特征亚组的 OS。成功构建了基于 ELNs 特征和其他临床特征的列线图模型。一致性指数(C-index)、校准图、接收器工作特征曲线和决策曲线分析(DCA)均用于评估列线图模型。Meta 分析、基因表达谱交互分析数据库和逆转录定量 PCR(RT-qPCR)分别用于验证 GC 组织和正常胃组织之间预后基因和免疫细胞的 RNA 表达或丰度。最后,我们分析了免疫检查点、化疗药物敏感性与风险评分之间的相关性。

结果

多因素分析显示,高 ELNs 组的 OS 明显优于低 ELNs 组(风险比[HR] = 0.659,95%置信区间[CI]:0.626-0.694,p < 0.0001)。利用训练集构建了一个包含 ELNs 的列线图,并证明其具有良好的校准度和区分度(C 指数[95%CI],0.714 [0.710-0.718]),在内部验证集(C 指数[95%CI],0.720 [0.714-0.726])、TCGA 集(C 指数[95%CI],0.693 [0.662-0.724])和中国集(C 指数[95%CI],0.750 [0.720-0.782])中得到验证。通过 LASSO-Cox 回归分析构建了基于 ELNs 组、调节性 T 细胞(Tregs)、中性粒细胞、CDKN2B-AS1、H19、HOTTIP、LINC00643、MIR663AHG、TMEM236、ZNF705A 和 hsa-miR-135a-5p 的 ELNs 相关特征模型。结果显示,高 ELNs 特征组的 OS 明显低于低 ELNs 特征组(HR = 2.418,95%CI:1.804-3.241,p < 0.001)。该特征模型在预测 1、3 和 5 年生存率方面表现良好(AUC[95%CI] = 0.688 [0.612-0.763]、0.744 [0.659-0.830]和 0.778 [0.647-0.909])。多因素 Cox 分析表明,风险评分是 GC 患者生存的独立预测因素。此外,预后基因(LINC00643、TMEM236 和 hsa-miR-135a-5p)的表达在 GC 组织和相邻非肿瘤组织之间存在差异。可用于预测 GC 患者 OS 的列线图的 C 指数为 0.710(95%CI:0.663-0.753)。校准图和 DCA 均显示该列线图具有良好的预测性能。此外,该特征与 N 分期和 T 分期显著相关。根据我们的分析,低 ELNs 特征组的 GC 患者可能具有更好的免疫治疗反应和 OS 结局。

结论

我们探讨了 ELNs 在 GC 中的预后作用,并成功构建了一个与 TCGA 中 GC 预后相关的基于 ELNs 的特征。研究结果表明,该特征是 GC 患者强有力的预测指标。该特征可能包含用于预测 GC 患者治疗反应的潜在生物标志物。此外,我们还确定了一种新的稳健列线图,该列线图结合了 ELNs 特征和临床因素,可用于预测 GC 患者 1、3 和 5 年 OS,这将有助于个性化生存预测,并为 GC 患者的临床决策提供支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/ba09804a8863/fimmu-13-947802-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/8246da38efdf/fimmu-13-947802-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/6422b73d991a/fimmu-13-947802-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/9dca32a051de/fimmu-13-947802-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/c64cfff883a1/fimmu-13-947802-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/986e751f3a9f/fimmu-13-947802-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/cb3ba6120ad3/fimmu-13-947802-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/ac1f13b6d2b7/fimmu-13-947802-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/7e720cfa8190/fimmu-13-947802-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/ba22f542237e/fimmu-13-947802-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/7901b2bda30e/fimmu-13-947802-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/995cf3b33576/fimmu-13-947802-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/7f0b3862f367/fimmu-13-947802-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/f96b72f08bbd/fimmu-13-947802-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/b08048eab930/fimmu-13-947802-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/ba09804a8863/fimmu-13-947802-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/8246da38efdf/fimmu-13-947802-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/6422b73d991a/fimmu-13-947802-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/9dca32a051de/fimmu-13-947802-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/c64cfff883a1/fimmu-13-947802-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/986e751f3a9f/fimmu-13-947802-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/cb3ba6120ad3/fimmu-13-947802-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/ac1f13b6d2b7/fimmu-13-947802-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/7e720cfa8190/fimmu-13-947802-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/ba22f542237e/fimmu-13-947802-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/7901b2bda30e/fimmu-13-947802-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/995cf3b33576/fimmu-13-947802-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/7f0b3862f367/fimmu-13-947802-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/f96b72f08bbd/fimmu-13-947802-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/b08048eab930/fimmu-13-947802-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a07f/9667298/ba09804a8863/fimmu-13-947802-g015.jpg

相似文献

1
A nomogram model based on the number of examined lymph nodes-related signature to predict prognosis and guide clinical therapy in gastric cancer.基于检查淋巴结数量相关特征的列线图模型预测胃癌的预后并指导临床治疗。
Front Immunol. 2022 Nov 2;13:947802. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.947802. eCollection 2022.
2
Impact of examined lymph node count on staging and long-term survival of patients with node-negative stage III gastric cancer: a retrospective study using a Chinese multi-institutional registry with Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data validation.检查的淋巴结数量对Ⅲ期淋巴结阴性胃癌患者分期及长期生存的影响:一项使用中国多机构登记数据并经监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据验证的回顾性研究
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Sep;8(17):1075. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-1358a.
3
The log odds of negative lymph nodes/T stage: a new prognostic and predictive tool for resected gastric cancer patients.淋巴结/肿瘤分期阴性的对数比值:一种新的可预测和预后工具,用于评估可切除胃癌患者。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Aug;147(8):2259-2269. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03654-y. Epub 2021 May 18.
4
Development and Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram for Gastric Cancer Based on DNA Methylation-Driven Differentially Expressed Genes.基于 DNA 甲基化驱动的差异表达基因构建胃癌预后列线图模型的建立与验证。
Int J Biol Sci. 2020 Feb 10;16(7):1153-1165. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.41587. eCollection 2020.
5
Construction of a novel mRNA-signature prediction model for prognosis of bladder cancer based on a statistical analysis.基于统计分析构建新型膀胱癌 mRNA 特征预测预后模型。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Jul 27;21(1):858. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08611-z.
6
The Nomogram predicting the overall survival of patients with pancreatic cancer treated with radiotherapy: a study based on the SEER database and a Chinese cohort.基于 SEER 数据库和中国队列研究的列线图预测胰腺癌患者放疗后总生存的研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Oct 25;14:1266318. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1266318. eCollection 2023.
7
A novel copper-induced cell death-related lncRNA prognostic signature associated with immune infiltration and clinical value in gastric cancer.一种新型铜诱导细胞死亡相关 lncRNA 预后标志物与胃癌免疫浸润和临床价值相关。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep;149(12):10543-10559. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04916-7. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
8
Construction of a prognostic model for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer patients undergoing immune therapy in northernmost China and prediction of treatment efficacy based on response status at different time points.构建中国最北部广泛期小细胞肺癌患者接受免疫治疗的预后模型,并基于不同时间点的反应状态预测治疗效果。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 May 15;150(5):255. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-05767-6.
9
[Establishment and validation of a novel nomogram to predict overall survival after radical nephrectomy].[一种预测根治性肾切除术后总生存期的新型列线图的建立与验证]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2023 Aug 23;45(8):681-689. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20221027-00722.
10
The assessment of the optimal number of examined lymph nodes and prognostic models based on lymph nodes for predicting survival outcome in patients with stage N3b gastric cancer.基于淋巴结评估 N3b 期胃癌患者的最佳检查淋巴结数量和预测生存结局的预后模型。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr;17(2):e117-e124. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13358. Epub 2020 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The long antisense non-coding RNA HOXA transcript at the distal tip (LncRNA HOTTIP) in health and disease: a comprehensive review and in silico analysis.健康与疾病中的远端长反义非编码RNA HOXA转录本(LncRNA HOTTIP):综述与计算机分析
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 5. doi: 10.1007/s00210-025-04372-9.
2
Development of a prognostic nomogram and risk factor analysis for survival in -positive non-cardia gastric adenocarcinoma patients.阳性非贲门胃腺癌患者生存的预后列线图开发及危险因素分析
Transl Cancer Res. 2025 May 30;14(5):2822-2834. doi: 10.21037/tcr-24-1776. Epub 2025 May 26.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The New Era of Immunotherapy in Gastric Cancer.胃癌免疫治疗的新时代
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Feb 18;14(4):1054. doi: 10.3390/cancers14041054.
2
Identification and Validation of a Potent Multi-lncRNA Molecular Model for Predicting Gastric Cancer Prognosis.一种用于预测胃癌预后的有效多lncRNA分子模型的鉴定与验证
Front Genet. 2021 Dec 20;12:607748. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.607748. eCollection 2021.
3
Transcriptome profiling by combined machine learning and statistical R analysis identifies TMEM236 as a potential novel diagnostic biomarker for colorectal cancer.
ncRNAs as Key Regulators in Gastric Cancer: From Molecular Subtyping to Therapeutic Targets.
非编码RNA作为胃癌的关键调控因子:从分子分型到治疗靶点
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May 13. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17368-9.
4
Machine learning-based reconstruction of prognostic staging for gastric cancer patients with different differentiation grades: A multicenter retrospective study.基于机器学习的不同分化程度胃癌患者预后分期重建:一项多中心回顾性研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 7;31(13):104466. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i13.104466.
5
Unveiling hotspots of emerging research in the miRNA-related mechanism underlying cancer through comprehensive bibliometric analysis with implications for precision medicine and non-invasive diagnostics.通过全面的文献计量分析揭示癌症相关miRNA机制的新兴研究热点,为精准医学和非侵入性诊断提供参考。
Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 15;14:1521251. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1521251. eCollection 2024.
6
Collagen signature adds prognostically significant information to staging for breast cancer.胶原蛋白特征为乳腺癌分期增添了具有预后意义的信息。
ESMO Open. 2024 Dec;9(12):103990. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103990. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
7
Screening high-risk individuals for primary gastric carcinoma: evaluating overall survival probability score in the presence and absence of lymphatic metastasis post-gastrectomy.筛查高危人群的原发性胃癌:评估胃切除术后有无淋巴转移的总体生存概率评分。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jul 25;22(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03481-8.
8
Effect of carbon nanoparticle suspension injection versus indocyanine green tracer in guiding lymph node dissection during radical gastrectomy (FUTURE-01): a randomized clinical trial.碳纳米颗粒混悬液注射与吲哚菁绿示踪剂在胃癌根治术中指导淋巴结清扫的效果比较(FUTURE-01):一项随机临床试验
Int J Surg. 2025 Jan 1;111(1):609-616. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001873.
9
Nomogram models for predicting overall and cancer-specific survival in early-onset gastric cancer patients: a population-based cohort study.预测早发性胃癌患者总生存和癌症特异性生存的列线图模型:一项基于人群的队列研究
Am J Cancer Res. 2024 Apr 15;14(4):1747-1767. doi: 10.62347/FPRM7701. eCollection 2024.
10
Establishment of a prognostic model for gastric cancer patients who underwent radical gastrectomy using machine learning: a two-center study.利用机器学习建立接受根治性胃切除术的胃癌患者的预后模型:一项双中心研究。
Front Oncol. 2024 Apr 11;13:1282042. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1282042. eCollection 2023.
联合机器学习和统计 R 分析的转录组谱分析鉴定 TMEM236 为结直肠癌的潜在新型诊断生物标志物。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 12;11(1):14304. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92692-0.
4
Exceeding 30 ELNs is strongly recommended for pT3-4N0 patients with gastric cancer: A multicenter study of survival, recurrence, and prediction model.强烈建议胃癌 pT3-4N0 患者使用超过 30 份 ELNs:一项生存、复发和预测模型的多中心研究。
Cancer Sci. 2021 Aug;112(8):3266-3277. doi: 10.1111/cas.15003. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
5
Association of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2B antisense RNA 1 gene expression and rs2383207 variant with breast cancer risk and survival.细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶抑制剂 2B 反义 RNA 1 基因表达与 rs2383207 变异与乳腺癌风险和生存的关联。
Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2021 Apr 13;26(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s11658-021-00258-9.
6
LncRNA CDKN2B-AS1 stabilized by IGF2BP3 drives the malignancy of renal clear cell carcinoma through epigenetically activating NUF2 transcription.长链非编码 RNA CDKN2B-AS1 被 IGF2BP3 稳定,通过表观遗传激活 NUF2 转录驱动肾透明细胞癌的恶性转化。
Cell Death Dis. 2021 Feb 19;12(2):201. doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-03489-y.
7
Development and clinical validation of a 3-miRNA signature to predict prognosis of gastric cancer.用于预测胃癌预后的3-miRNA标志物的开发与临床验证
PeerJ. 2021 Feb 3;9:e10462. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10462. eCollection 2021.
8
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
9
A comprehensive survey for human transcription factors on expression, regulation, interaction, phenotype and cancer survival.人类转录因子在表达、调控、相互作用、表型和癌症生存方面的全面调查。
Brief Bioinform. 2021 Sep 2;22(5). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbab002.
10
Immunotherapy of gastric cancer: Past, future perspective and challenges.胃癌的免疫治疗:过去、未来的展望与挑战。
Pathol Res Pract. 2021 Feb;218:153322. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2020.153322. Epub 2020 Dec 24.