Department of Psychology, Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de L'Éducation, Université de Genève, 40 Boulevard du Pont d'Arve, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.
Psychol Res. 2023 Jun;87(4):1243-1255. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01734-3. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
Visual attention is often inadvertently captured by salient stimuli. It was suggested that it is possible to prevent attentional capture in some search tasks by suppressing salient stimuli below baseline. Evidence for attentional suppression comes from a probe task that was interleaved with the main search task. In the probe task of Gaspelin et al. (Psychol Sci 26(11):1740-1750, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615597913 ), letters were shown on the stimuli of the search display and participants had to identify as many letters as possible. Performance was found to be worse for letters shown on the distractor compared to non-salient non-target stimuli, suggesting that distractor processing was suppressed below baseline. However, it is unclear whether suppression occurred at the level of perception or decision-making because participants may have reported letters on the distractor less frequently than letters on nontargets. This decision-level bias may have degraded performance for letters on distractor compared to nontarget stimuli without changing perception. After replicating the original findings, we conducted two experiments where we avoided report bias by cueing only a single letter for report. We found that the difference between distractor and nontarget stimuli was strongly reduced, suggesting that decision-level processes contribute to attentional suppression. In contrast, the difference between target and non-target stimuli was unchanged, suggesting that it reflected perceptual-level enhancement of the target stimuli.
视觉注意力经常会被显著的刺激无意中吸引。有人认为,通过抑制显著刺激低于基线,可以在某些搜索任务中防止注意力捕获。注意力抑制的证据来自于一个与主要搜索任务交错的探针任务。在 Gaspelin 等人的研究(《心理科学》26(11):1740-1750, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615597913 )中,字母在搜索显示的刺激上显示,参与者必须尽可能多地识别出字母。研究发现,与非显著非目标刺激相比,在分心刺激上显示的字母的表现更差,这表明分心处理被抑制在基线以下。然而,不清楚抑制是发生在感知还是决策层面,因为参与者可能比非目标刺激报告分心刺激上的字母的频率更低。这种决策层面的偏差可能会导致与非目标刺激相比,分心刺激的表现下降,而不改变感知。在复制原始发现之后,我们进行了两项实验,通过只提示报告单个字母,我们避免了报告偏差。我们发现,分心刺激和非目标刺激之间的差异大大减小,这表明决策层面的过程有助于注意力抑制。相比之下,目标和非目标刺激之间的差异没有变化,这表明它反映了目标刺激的感知层面增强。