• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意抑制是在知觉水平还是决策水平发生的?加斯佩林等人(2015)的探测字母任务的证据。

Does attentional suppression occur at the level of perception or decision-making? Evidence from Gaspelin et al.'s (2015) probe letter task.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de L'Éducation, Université de Genève, 40 Boulevard du Pont d'Arve, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2023 Jun;87(4):1243-1255. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01734-3. Epub 2022 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-022-01734-3
PMID:36094666
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10191966/
Abstract

Visual attention is often inadvertently captured by salient stimuli. It was suggested that it is possible to prevent attentional capture in some search tasks by suppressing salient stimuli below baseline. Evidence for attentional suppression comes from a probe task that was interleaved with the main search task. In the probe task of Gaspelin et al. (Psychol Sci 26(11):1740-1750, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615597913 ), letters were shown on the stimuli of the search display and participants had to identify as many letters as possible. Performance was found to be worse for letters shown on the distractor compared to non-salient non-target stimuli, suggesting that distractor processing was suppressed below baseline. However, it is unclear whether suppression occurred at the level of perception or decision-making because participants may have reported letters on the distractor less frequently than letters on nontargets. This decision-level bias may have degraded performance for letters on distractor compared to nontarget stimuli without changing perception. After replicating the original findings, we conducted two experiments where we avoided report bias by cueing only a single letter for report. We found that the difference between distractor and nontarget stimuli was strongly reduced, suggesting that decision-level processes contribute to attentional suppression. In contrast, the difference between target and non-target stimuli was unchanged, suggesting that it reflected perceptual-level enhancement of the target stimuli.

摘要

视觉注意力经常会被显著的刺激无意中吸引。有人认为,通过抑制显著刺激低于基线,可以在某些搜索任务中防止注意力捕获。注意力抑制的证据来自于一个与主要搜索任务交错的探针任务。在 Gaspelin 等人的研究(《心理科学》26(11):1740-1750, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615597913 )中,字母在搜索显示的刺激上显示,参与者必须尽可能多地识别出字母。研究发现,与非显著非目标刺激相比,在分心刺激上显示的字母的表现更差,这表明分心处理被抑制在基线以下。然而,不清楚抑制是发生在感知还是决策层面,因为参与者可能比非目标刺激报告分心刺激上的字母的频率更低。这种决策层面的偏差可能会导致与非目标刺激相比,分心刺激的表现下降,而不改变感知。在复制原始发现之后,我们进行了两项实验,通过只提示报告单个字母,我们避免了报告偏差。我们发现,分心刺激和非目标刺激之间的差异大大减小,这表明决策层面的过程有助于注意力抑制。相比之下,目标和非目标刺激之间的差异没有变化,这表明它反映了目标刺激的感知层面增强。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2482/10191966/045680c75d11/426_2022_1734_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2482/10191966/4d82f65829e1/426_2022_1734_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2482/10191966/703fb8d21986/426_2022_1734_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2482/10191966/045680c75d11/426_2022_1734_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2482/10191966/4d82f65829e1/426_2022_1734_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2482/10191966/703fb8d21986/426_2022_1734_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2482/10191966/045680c75d11/426_2022_1734_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Does attentional suppression occur at the level of perception or decision-making? Evidence from Gaspelin et al.'s (2015) probe letter task.注意抑制是在知觉水平还是决策水平发生的?加斯佩林等人(2015)的探测字母任务的证据。
Psychol Res. 2023 Jun;87(4):1243-1255. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01734-3. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
7
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
8
Prophylactic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the prevention of macular oedema after cataract surgery.预防性使用非甾体抗炎药预防白内障手术后黄斑水肿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):CD006683. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006683.pub3.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
10
Topical antibiotics with steroids for chronic suppurative otitis media.用于慢性化脓性中耳炎的含类固醇局部用抗生素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6(6):CD013054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013054.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
The consequences of preparing for informative or distracting stimuli.为信息性或干扰性刺激做准备的后果。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 19;15(1):17402. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02476-z.
2
Swift attenuation of irrelevant features through feature consistency: Evidence from a capture-probe version of the contingent-capture protocol.通过特征一致性快速衰减不相关特征:来自权变捕获协议的捕获探针版本的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 May;77(5):994-1008. doi: 10.1177/17470218231186045. Epub 2023 Jul 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Oculomotor suppression of abrupt onsets versus color singletons.动眼神经对突然出现的刺激与颜色单一刺激的抑制作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Apr;85(3):613-633. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02524-0. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
2
Electrophysiological Evidence for the Suppression of Highly Salient Distractors.电生理证据表明对高度显著的分心物的抑制。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Mar 31;34(5):787-805. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01827.
3
Electrophysiological evidence for target facilitation without distractor suppression in two-stimulus search displays.
双刺激搜索显示中目标促进而无分心物抑制的电生理学证据。
Cereb Cortex. 2022 Aug 22;32(17):3816-3828. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab450.
4
Attentional suppression of highly salient color singletons.注意抑制高度显著的颜色单一刺激。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Oct;47(10):1313-1328. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000948.
5
Do we need attentional suppression?我们需要注意力抑制吗?
Vis cogn. 2021 Sep 28;29(9):580-582. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2021.1918304. eCollection 2021.
6
Preparatory Control Against Distraction Is Not Feature-Based.预备性控制对分心不具有特征性。
Cereb Cortex. 2022 May 30;32(11):2398-2411. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab341.
7
On preventing attention capture: Is singleton suppression actually singleton suppression?防止注意捕获:单一抑制是否真的是单一抑制?
Psychol Res. 2022 Sep;86(6):1958-1971. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01599-y. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
8
P components and distractor inhibition in visual search: New evidence for the signal suppression hypothesis.视觉搜索中的 P 成分和分心物抑制:信号抑制假说的新证据。
Psychophysiology. 2021 Sep;58(9):e13878. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13878. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
9
Progress Toward Resolving the Attentional Capture Debate.解决注意力捕获争论的进展。
Vis cogn. 2021;29(1):1-21. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2020.1848949. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
10
Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search.引导式搜索 6.0:一种更新的视觉搜索模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Aug;28(4):1060-1092. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01859-9. Epub 2021 Feb 5.