• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Measurement of outcomes of general practice: comparison of three health status measures.

作者信息

Hall J, Hall N, Fisher E, Killer D

出版信息

Fam Pract. 1987 Jun;4(2):117-22. doi: 10.1093/fampra/4.2.117.

DOI:10.1093/fampra/4.2.117
PMID:3609549
Abstract

The broad range of medical problems seen in general practice means that the assessment of health outcomes shares much with the assessment of health status in the general community. The last two decades have seen considerable progress in health status measurement for this purpose. This paper reports the use of three such measures in a general practice setting. The 'Rand health insurance study battery', the 'sickness impact profile' and the 'general health questionnaire' were tested in two general practices in Sydney, Australia, to determine patient compliance, to assess the range of scores and discriminative ability of the instruments, and to compare the different instruments. There was a high degree of acceptance of the questionnaires, showing that patients visiting their general practitioners are prepared to complete such questionnaires. The range of scores obtained was less skewed for the Rand measures than for the sickness impact profile or the general health questionnaire, suggesting that the Rand measures should be the preferred general health status measure.

摘要

相似文献

1
Measurement of outcomes of general practice: comparison of three health status measures.
Fam Pract. 1987 Jun;4(2):117-22. doi: 10.1093/fampra/4.2.117.
2
Assessment of children's health status. Field test of new approaches.儿童健康状况评估。新方法的实地测试。
Med Care. 1989 Mar;27(3 Suppl):S54-65. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198903001-00005.
3
Reliability of the MOS SF36 health status measure in Australian general practice.
Aust Fam Physician. 1998 Jul;27 Suppl 2:S94-8.
4
Consequences of using SF-12 and RAND-12 when examining levels of well-being and psychological distress.在研究幸福感和心理困扰水平时使用SF-12和RAND-12的后果。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;42(4):315-23. doi: 10.1080/00048670701881579.
5
A comparison of country and metropolitan general practice.乡村与大都市全科医疗的比较。
Med J Aust. 1993 Nov 1;159(S2):S9-64.
6
Responding to Young People's Health Risks in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomised Trial of Training Clinicians in Screening and Motivational Interviewing.应对初级保健中年轻人的健康风险:一项针对临床医生进行筛查和动机性访谈培训的整群随机试验
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 30;10(9):e0137581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137581. eCollection 2015.
7
Measuring health status in the community: a comparison of methods.衡量社区中的健康状况:方法比较
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994 Feb;48(1):86-91. doi: 10.1136/jech.48.1.86.
8
The sickness impact profile: validation of a health status measure.疾病影响量表:一种健康状况测量工具的验证
Med Care. 1976 Jan;14(1):57-67. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197601000-00006.
9
Patient acceptance of two health status measures: the Medical Outcomes Study Short-form General Health Survey and the Duke Health Profile.患者对两种健康状况测量工具的接受度:医学结果研究简式一般健康调查问卷和杜克健康状况量表。
Fam Med. 1993 Sep;25(8):536-9.
10
Use of health status measures in patients with low back pain in clinical settings. Comparison of specific, generic and preference-based instruments.临床环境下腰痛患者健康状况测量指标的应用。特定、通用及基于偏好的测量工具的比较。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000 Jul;39(7):783-90. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/39.7.783.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments.通用生活质量量表的比较综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Jan;17(1):13-35. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200017010-00002.