Suppr超能文献

在纤维肌痛综合征患者的治疗中,普拉提比有氧运动更有效且更具成本效益吗?一项带有经济评估的随机对照试验。

Is Pilates more effective and cost-effective than aerobic exercise in the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia syndrome? A randomized controlled trial with economic evaluation.

作者信息

Franco Katherinne Ferro Moura, Miyamoto Gisela Cristiane, Franco Yuri Rafael Dos Santos, Salvador Evany Maira Espírito Santo, do Nascimento Bruna Cristina Brajon, Menten Laura Alves, Cabral Cristina Maria Nunes

机构信息

Master's and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, Brazil.

Faculty of Science, Department of Health Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Pain. 2023 Jan;27(1):54-71. doi: 10.1002/ejp.2039. Epub 2022 Sep 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Pilates versus aerobic exercises in the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia syndrome from a societal perspective.

METHODS

This two-arm randomized controlled trial with blinded assessor and economic evaluation included 98 patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia syndrome using the American College of Rheumatology 2010 criteria, aged between 20 and 75 years, and pain intensity ≥3 points in the Pain Numerical Rating Scale. Patients were randomly allocated into the aerobic or Pilates group. Treatment was performed twice a week for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was the impact of fibromyalgia measured 8 weeks after randomization. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses were conducted for the impact of fibromyalgia and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), respectively, with a 12-month time horizon.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the groups for the impact of fibromyalgia (MD: 6.5 points; 95% CI: -1.8 to 14.9). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio showed that 1-point increase in the impact of fibromyalgia was on average associated with a societal cost of £56 for the Pilates group compared to the aerobic group. The cost-utility analysis showed that the Pilates group had a 0.71 probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay of £30,000 per QALY gained.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference between groups for the impact of fibromyalgia. Pilates was not cost-effective compared to aerobic exercises for the impact of fibromyalgia. However, Pilates seemed to be the preferred option of treatment considering QALYs, although it depends on the willingness-to-pay threshold.

SIGNIFICANCE

Pilates showed to be a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. Pilates presented similar results for the impact of fibromyalgia and superior results for pain relief compared to aerobic exercises, a highly recommended intervention for the treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome. Pilates was not cost-effective compared to aerobic exercises for the impact of fibromyalgia. However, Pilates seemed to be a cost-effective intervention for QALYs, depending on the decision-maker's willingness-to-pay threshold.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在从社会角度评估普拉提与有氧运动在治疗纤维肌痛综合征患者方面的有效性和成本效益。

方法

这项双臂随机对照试验采用盲法评估和经济评估,纳入了98例根据美国风湿病学会2010年标准诊断为纤维肌痛综合征的患者,年龄在20至75岁之间,疼痛强度在疼痛数字评分量表中≥3分。患者被随机分配到有氧运动组或普拉提组。治疗每周进行两次,共8周。主要结局是随机分组8周后测量的纤维肌痛影响。分别在12个月的时间范围内对纤维肌痛影响和质量调整生命年(QALY)进行了成本效益和成本效用分析。

结果

两组在纤维肌痛影响方面无差异(MD:6.5分;95%CI:-1.8至14.9)。增量成本效益比显示,与有氧运动组相比,普拉提组纤维肌痛影响增加1分平均与56英镑的社会成本相关。成本效用分析表明,普拉提组在每获得一个QALY支付意愿为30,000英镑时具有0.71的成本效益概率。

结论

两组在纤维肌痛影响方面无显著差异。就纤维肌痛影响而言,普拉提与有氧运动相比不具有成本效益。然而,考虑到QALY,普拉提似乎是首选的治疗选择,尽管这取决于支付意愿阈值。

意义

普拉提被证明是治疗纤维肌痛综合征患者的一种安全有效的替代方法。与有氧运动相比,普拉提在纤维肌痛影响方面呈现相似结果,在疼痛缓解方面效果更佳,有氧运动是治疗纤维肌痛综合征的高度推荐干预措施。就纤维肌痛影响而言,普拉提与有氧运动相比不具有成本效益。然而,取决于决策者的支付意愿阈值,普拉提对于QALY似乎是一种具有成本效益的干预措施。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验