• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利益相关者对《国际人用药品注册技术协调会(ICH)E6 药物临床试验质量管理规范(GCP)指南》最有帮助和最无帮助方面的看法以及他们对修订 ICH E6(R2)的期望。

Stakeholders' views on the most and least helpful aspects of the ICH E6 GCP guideline and their aspirations for the revision of ICH E6(R2).

作者信息

Dombeck Carrie, Swezey Teresa, Forrest Annemarie, Tenaerts Pamela, Corneli Amy

机构信息

Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022 Aug 17;29:100983. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100983. eCollection 2022 Oct.

DOI:10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100983
PMID:36111176
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9468347/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) has published the ICH E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guideline, which provides standards for the design, conduct, documentation, and reporting of clinical trials. Revision to E6(R2) is currently underway, aiming to adapt the guidance to the current regulatory environment. The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) interviewed stakeholders, gathering their experiences implementing ICH E6 GCP and suggestions for revising the guidance.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative descriptive study using in-depth interviews. Participants were purposefully selected to ensure diversity in geography, research role, and type of institution. Participants reflected on their aspirations for the ICH E6 GCP revision and described sections of the guidance that they found most and least helpful. Narratives were analyzed using applied thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Many participants found ICH E6 GCP generally clear and helpful. They appreciated that the guidance is globally accepted and serves as a common standard for research worldwide. Participants also noted opportunities for improvement, suggesting that the revised guidance should incorporate flexibility, simplify requirements, and accommodate advances in research conduct. They highlighted areas where language should be updated and concepts clarified and expressed a desire for transparency and inclusiveness in the revision process.

CONCLUSION

Our findings show that many participants view the ICH E6(R2) guidance as helpful overall, although substantial room for improvement remains. We have provided the full report of these findings to ICH in hopes that it will be useful as the E6 GCP guideline is revised.

摘要

背景

人用药品注册技术国际协调理事会(ICH)发布了ICH E6(R2)《药物临床试验质量管理规范》(GCP)指南,该指南为临床试验的设计、实施、记录和报告提供了标准。目前正在对E6(R2)进行修订,旨在使该指南适应当前的监管环境。临床试验转型倡议(CTTI)对利益相关者进行了访谈,收集他们实施ICH E6 GCP的经验以及对修订该指南的建议。

方法

我们采用深入访谈进行了一项定性描述性研究。有目的地选择参与者以确保地域、研究角色和机构类型的多样性。参与者思考了他们对ICH E6 GCP修订的期望,并描述了他们认为最有帮助和最没有帮助的指南部分。使用应用主题分析法对访谈内容进行分析。

结果

许多参与者发现ICH E6 GCP总体上清晰且有帮助。他们赞赏该指南被全球接受,并作为全球研究的通用标准。参与者还指出了改进的机会,建议修订后的指南应纳入灵活性因素、简化要求并适应研究实施方面的进展。他们强调了语言应更新以及概念应澄清的领域,并表达了对修订过程透明度和包容性的期望。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,许多参与者总体上认为ICH E6(R2)指南是有帮助的,尽管仍有很大的改进空间。我们已将这些研究结果的完整报告提供给ICH,希望在修订E6 GCP指南时能有所帮助。

相似文献

1
Stakeholders' views on the most and least helpful aspects of the ICH E6 GCP guideline and their aspirations for the revision of ICH E6(R2).利益相关者对《国际人用药品注册技术协调会(ICH)E6 药物临床试验质量管理规范(GCP)指南》最有帮助和最无帮助方面的看法以及他们对修订 ICH E6(R2)的期望。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022 Aug 17;29:100983. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100983. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
Stakeholders' recommendations for revising Good Clinical Practice.利益相关者对修订《药物临床试验质量管理规范》的建议。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Apr 16;22:100776. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100776. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
International Council for Harmonisation E6(R2) addendum: Challenges of implementation.国际协调理事会E6(R2)增编:实施挑战。
Perspect Clin Res. 2017 Oct-Dec;8(4):162-166. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_124_17.
4
Quality Tolerance Limits: Framework for Successful Implementation in Clinical Development.质量容忍限度:临床开发中成功实施的框架。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Mar;55(2):251-261. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00209-0. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
5
Survey Results and Recommendations from Japanese Stakeholders for Good Clinical Practice Renovation.日本利益相关者对良好临床实践改革的调查结果和建议。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Mar;56(2):220-229. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00350-4. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
6
The Good Clinical Practice guideline and its interpretation - perceptions of clinical trial teams in sub-Saharan Africa.《药物临床试验质量管理规范》指南及其解读——撒哈拉以南非洲地区临床试验团队的看法
Trop Med Int Health. 2016 Aug;21(8):1040-1048. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12734. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
7
Good intentions and ICH-GCP: Trial conduct training needs to go beyond the ICH-GCP document and include the intention-to-treat principle.良好意愿与国际人用药品注册技术协调会(ICH)- 药品临床试验质量管理规范(GCP):试验实施培训需要超越ICH - GCP文件,纳入意向性分析原则。
Clin Trials. 2014 Dec;11(6):629-34. doi: 10.1177/1740774514542620. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
8
General Principles for the Education and Training of GCP Inspectors: The Outcome of Discussions by International Regulatory Experts in the Discussion Group on the ICH E6 Guideline.《药物临床试验质量管理规范》检查员教育与培训的一般原则:国际监管专家在人用药品注册技术协调会E6指南讨论组中的讨论结果
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2015 Mar;49(2):249-253. doi: 10.1177/2168479014551646.
9
Improving the quality conduct and efficiency of clinical trials with training: Recommendations for preparedness and qualification of investigators and delegates.通过培训提高临床试验的质量、实施和效率:对研究者和代表的准备和资格的建议。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Feb;89:105918. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105918. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
10
[ICH-GCP Guideline: quality assurance of clinical trials. Status and perspectives].[国际人用药品注册技术协调会 - 药物临床试验质量管理规范指南:临床试验的质量保证。现状与展望]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2003 Apr 14;165(16):1659-62.

引用本文的文献

1
Toward a global harmonization of service infrastructure in academic clinical trial units: an international survey.迈向学术临床试验单位服务基础设施的全球协调:一项国际调查。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Oct 12;10:1252352. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1252352. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Survey Results and Recommendations from Japanese Stakeholders for Good Clinical Practice Renovation.日本利益相关者对良好临床实践改革的调查结果和建议。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Mar;56(2):220-229. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00350-4. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
2
Stakeholders' recommendations for revising Good Clinical Practice.利益相关者对修订《药物临床试验质量管理规范》的建议。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Apr 16;22:100776. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100776. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
It is time to revise the international Good Clinical Practices guidelines: recommendations from non-commercial North-South collaborative trials.是时候修订国际药物临床试验规范指南了:来自非商业性南北合作试验的建议。
BMJ Glob Health. 2016 Nov 16;1(3):e000122. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000122. eCollection 2016.
4
The revision of the ICH Good Clinical Practice guidelines: a missed opportunity?国际人用药品注册技术协调会(ICH)《药物临床试验质量管理规范》指南的修订:一个错失的机遇?
Indian J Med Ethics. 2017 Oct-Dec;2(4):255-259. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2017.057.
5
Clinical Research in Neglected Tropical Diseases: The Challenge of Implementing Good Clinical (Laboratory) Practices.被忽视热带病的临床研究:实施良好临床(实验室)规范的挑战
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Nov 3;10(11):e0004654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004654. eCollection 2016 Nov.
6
The Good Clinical Practice guideline and its interpretation - perceptions of clinical trial teams in sub-Saharan Africa.《药物临床试验质量管理规范》指南及其解读——撒哈拉以南非洲地区临床试验团队的看法
Trop Med Int Health. 2016 Aug;21(8):1040-1048. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12734. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
7
What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited.名称的含义是什么?重新审视定性描述。
Res Nurs Health. 2010 Feb;33(1):77-84. doi: 10.1002/nur.20362.
8
Whatever happened to qualitative description?定性描述怎么了?
Res Nurs Health. 2000 Aug;23(4):334-40. doi: 10.1002/1098-240x(200008)23:4<334::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-g.