Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情前后 NIH 资助申请中的性别差异。

Gender Differences in National Institutes of Health Grant Submissions Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.

Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Sep;31(9):1241-1245. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0182.

Abstract

Emerging data suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately impacted women in academic medicine, potentially eliminating recent gains that have been made toward gender equity. This study examined possible pandemic-related gender disparities in research grant submissions, one of the most important criteria for academic promotion and tenure evaluations. Data were collected from two major academic institutions (one private and one public) on the gender and academic rank of faculty principal investigators who submitted new grants to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) during COVID-19 (March 1st, 2020, through August 31, 2020) compared with a matched period in 2019 (March 1st, 2019, through August 31, 2019). -Tests and chi-square analyses compared the gender distribution of individuals who submitted grants during the two periods of examination. In 2019 (prepandemic), there was no significant difference in the average number of grants submitted by women compared with men faculty. In contrast, women faculty submitted significantly fewer grants in 2020 (during the pandemic) than men. Men were also significantly more likely than women to submit grants in both 2019 and 2020 compared with submitting in 2019 only, suggesting men faculty may have been more likely than their women colleagues to sustain their productivity in grant submissions during the pandemic. Women's loss of extramural funding may compound over time, as it impedes new data collection, research progress, and academic advancement. Efforts to support women's research productivity and career trajectories are urgently needed in the following years of pandemic recovery.

摘要

新出现的数据表明,COVID-19 大流行对学术医学领域的女性造成了不成比例的影响,可能消除了最近在性别平等方面取得的进展。本研究考察了研究资助申请中与大流行相关的性别差异,这是学术晋升和终身职位评估的最重要标准之一。

数据来自两个主要学术机构(一个是私立的,一个是公立的),比较了在 COVID-19 期间(2020 年 3 月 1 日至 8 月 31 日)向美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)提交新资助申请的教职员工主要研究者的性别和学术职称,以及 2019 年同期(2019 年 3 月 1 日至 8 月 31 日)。

  • 测试和卡方分析比较了两个检查期间提交资助的个体的性别分布。2019 年(大流行前),女性教职员工提交的资助数量与男性教职员工相比没有显著差异。相比之下,女性教职员工在 2020 年(大流行期间)提交的资助明显少于男性。男性在 2019 年和 2020 年都比只在 2019 年提交的情况下更有可能提交资助,这表明男性教职员工在大流行期间可能比女性同事更有可能维持他们的资助申请生产力。

女性的外部资助流失可能会随着时间的推移而加剧,因为这会阻碍新数据的收集、研究进展和学术进步。在大流行恢复的未来几年中,迫切需要努力支持女性的研究生产力和职业轨迹。

相似文献

3
Gender disparities in academic vascular surgeons.血管外科医生中的性别差异。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Oct;72(4):1445-1450. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.12.042. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
4
NIH funding longevity by gender.美国国立卫生研究院按性别资助寿命研究。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 31;115(31):7943-7948. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800615115. Epub 2018 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9
Gender disparities in coronavirus disease 2019 clinical trial leadership.2019 年冠状病毒病临床试验领导中的性别差异。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Jul;27(7):1007-1010. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.12.025. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验