• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19 大流行期间生物医学研究出版物作者中的性别差异:回顾性观察研究。

Gender Disparity in the Authorship of Biomedical Research Publications During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Observational Study.

机构信息

Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 12;23(4):e25379. doi: 10.2196/25379.

DOI:10.2196/25379
PMID:33735097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8043146/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gender imbalances in academia have been evident historically and persist today. For the past 60 years, we have witnessed the increase of participation of women in biomedical disciplines, showing that the gender gap is shrinking. However, preliminary evidence suggests that women, including female researchers, are disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of unequal distribution of childcare, elderly care, and other kinds of domestic and emotional labor. Sudden lockdowns and abrupt shifts in daily routines have had disproportionate consequences on their productivity, which is reflected by a sudden drop in research output in biomedical research, consequently affecting the number of female authors of scientific publications.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that the COVID-19 pandemic has had a disproportionate adverse effect on the productivity of female researchers in the biomedical field in terms of authorship of scientific publications.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational bibliometric study. We investigated the proportion of male and female researchers who published scientific papers during the COVID-19 pandemic, using bibliometric data from biomedical preprint servers and selected Springer-Nature journals. We used the ordinary least squares regression model to estimate the expected proportions over time by correcting for temporal trends. We also used a set of statistical methods, such as the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and regression discontinuity design, to test the validity of the results.

RESULTS

A total of 78,950 papers from the bioRxiv and medRxiv repositories and from 62 selected Springer-Nature journals by 346,354 unique authors were analyzed. The acquired data set consisted of papers that were published between January 1, 2019, and August 2, 2020. The proportion of female first authors publishing in the biomedical field during the pandemic dropped by 9.1%, on average, across disciplines (expected arithmetic mean y=0.39; observed arithmetic mean y=0.35; standard error of the estimate, S=0.007; standard error of the observation, σ=0.004). The impact was particularly pronounced for papers related to COVID-19 research, where the proportion of female scientists in the first author position dropped by 28% (y=0.39; y=0.28; S=0.007; σ=0.007). When looking at the last authors, the proportion of women dropped by 7.9%, on average (y=0.25; y=0.23; S=0.005; σ=0.003), while the proportion of women writing about COVID-19 as the last author decreased by 18.8% (y=0.25; y=0.21; S=0.005; σ=0.007). Further, by geocoding authors' affiliations, we showed that the gender disparities became even more apparent when disaggregated by country, up to 35% in some cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings document a decrease in the number of publications by female authors in the biomedical field during the global pandemic. This effect was particularly pronounced for papers related to COVID-19, indicating that women are producing fewer publications related to COVID-19 research. This sudden increase in the gender gap was persistent across the 10 countries with the highest number of researchers. These results should be used to inform the scientific community of this worrying trend in COVID-19 research and the disproportionate effect that the pandemic has had on female academics.

摘要

背景

学术界的性别失衡现象历史悠久,至今仍然存在。在过去的 60 年里,我们见证了女性参与生物医学学科的比例不断增加,表明性别差距正在缩小。然而,初步证据表明,包括女性研究人员在内的女性在儿童保育、老年人护理和其他各种家庭和情感劳动方面受到 COVID-19 大流行的不平等分配的不成比例的影响。突然的封锁和日常生活的急剧转变对她们的生产力产生了不成比例的影响,这反映在生物医学研究的研究产出突然下降,从而影响了科学出版物的女性作者数量。

目的

本研究旨在检验以下假设:COVID-19 大流行对生物医学领域女性研究人员的生产力产生了不成比例的不利影响,表现在科学出版物的作者身份上。

方法

这是一项回顾性观察性生物计量学研究。我们使用生物预印本服务器和选定的施普林格-自然期刊的生物计量数据,调查了在 COVID-19 大流行期间发表科学论文的男性和女性研究人员的比例。我们使用普通最小二乘回归模型,通过校正时间趋势来估计随时间变化的预期比例。我们还使用了一组统计方法,如柯尔莫哥洛夫-斯米尔诺夫检验和回归不连续性设计,来检验结果的有效性。

结果

共分析了来自 bioRxiv 和 medRxiv 存储库以及 62 种选定的施普林格-自然期刊的 78950 篇论文,这些论文由 346354 位独特的作者撰写。所获得的数据集包括 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 8 月 2 日期间发表的论文。在整个学科领域,女性第一作者在大流行期间发表论文的比例平均下降了 9.1%(预期算术平均值 y=0.39;观察到的算术平均值 y=0.35;估计的标准误差,S=0.007;观察到的标准误差,σ=0.004)。对于与 COVID-19 研究相关的论文,女性科学家在第一作者位置的比例下降了 28%,这一影响尤其显著(y=0.39;y=0.28;S=0.007;σ=0.007)。当我们观察最后一位作者时,女性的比例平均下降了 7.9%(y=0.25;y=0.23;S=0.005;σ=0.003),而将 COVID-19 作为最后作者的女性比例下降了 18.8%(y=0.25;y=0.21;S=0.005;σ=0.007)。此外,通过对作者所属机构进行地理编码,我们表明,当按国家细分时,性别差距变得更加明显,在某些情况下甚至高达 35%。

结论

我们的研究结果记录了在全球大流行期间,生物医学领域女性作者发表的论文数量减少。这种影响在与 COVID-19 相关的论文中尤为明显,表明女性在撰写与 COVID-19 研究相关的论文方面减少了。这种性别差距的突然增加在拥有最多研究人员的 10 个国家中持续存在。这些结果应该被用来告知科学界这一令人担忧的 COVID-19 研究趋势,以及大流行对女性学者的不成比例影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba93/8043146/bccf3406d26e/jmir_v23i4e25379_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba93/8043146/99fe767e20c9/jmir_v23i4e25379_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba93/8043146/02763acb4c4b/jmir_v23i4e25379_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba93/8043146/0257541b7ba6/jmir_v23i4e25379_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba93/8043146/bccf3406d26e/jmir_v23i4e25379_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba93/8043146/99fe767e20c9/jmir_v23i4e25379_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba93/8043146/02763acb4c4b/jmir_v23i4e25379_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba93/8043146/0257541b7ba6/jmir_v23i4e25379_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba93/8043146/bccf3406d26e/jmir_v23i4e25379_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Gender Disparity in the Authorship of Biomedical Research Publications During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Observational Study.COVID-19 大流行期间生物医学研究出版物作者中的性别差异:回顾性观察研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 12;23(4):e25379. doi: 10.2196/25379.
2
Author Gender Inequality in Medical Imaging Journals and the COVID-19 Pandemic.医学影像学期刊中的作者性别不平等与新冠疫情。
Radiology. 2021 Jul;300(1):E301-E307. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204417. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
3
COVID-19 medical papers have fewer women first authors than expected.COVID-19 医学论文中女性第一作者的数量低于预期。
Elife. 2020 Jun 15;9:e58807. doi: 10.7554/eLife.58807.
4
Longitudinal analyses of gender differences in first authorship publications related to COVID-19.与 COVID-19 相关的第一作者出版物中性别差异的纵向分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 5;11(4):e045176. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045176.
5
Gender parity in scientific authorship in a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre: a bibliometric analysis.在英国国家健康研究所生物医学研究中心的科学著作中实现性别均等:文献计量学分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 23;11(3):e037935. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037935.
6
Impact of COVID-19 on longitudinal ophthalmology authorship gender trends.COVID-19 对眼科纵向作者性别趋势的影响。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar;259(3):733-744. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05085-4. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
7
Female authorship of covid-19 research in manuscripts submitted to 11 biomedical journals: cross sectional study.11 种生物医学期刊投稿论文中的新冠研究女性作者署名情况:横断面研究。
BMJ. 2021 Oct 6;375:n2288. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2288.
8
Factors affecting sex-related reporting in medical research: a cross-disciplinary bibliometric analysis.影响医学研究中性别报告的因素:跨学科文献计量分析。
Lancet. 2019 Feb 9;393(10171):550-559. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32995-7.
9
The impact of COVID-19 on academic productivity by female physicians and researchers in transfusion medicine.COVID-19 对输血医学领域女性医师和研究人员学术生产力的影响。
Transfusion. 2021 Jun;61(6):1690-1693. doi: 10.1111/trf.16306. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
10
Was the COVID-19 Pandemic Associated with Gender Disparities in Authorship of Manuscripts Submitted to Clinical Neuropsychology Journals?新冠疫情是否与提交给临床神经心理学杂志的稿件作者性别差异有关?
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2023 Jan;29(1):105-109. doi: 10.1017/S1355617721001375. Epub 2021 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Global Trends and Cross-Country Differences in Authorship by Women in Academic Anaesthesiology Since 1996: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Analysis.1996年以来学术麻醉学领域女性作者的全球趋势与跨国差异:重复横断面分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 21;14(16):5891. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165891.
2
Representation of women in scientific subjects: overview of systematic reviews investigating career progress in academic publishing with a focus on mental health.科学学科领域中的女性代表情况:以心理健康为重点对学术出版领域职业发展相关系统评价的综述
BJPsych Open. 2025 Mar 12;11(2):e49. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.820.
3
Global perspectives to enhance strategies for advancing women in healthcare and STEMM leadership.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 and the Gender Employment Gap among Parents of Young Children.新冠疫情与幼儿父母的性别就业差距
Can Public Policy. 2020 Aug 1;46(Suppl 2):S89-S101. doi: 10.3138/cpp.2020-077.
2
Comparison and benchmark of name-to-gender inference services.姓名到性别的推理服务的比较与基准测试
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2018 Jul 16;4:e156. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.156. eCollection 2018.
3
Who is the Most Stressed During the COVID-19 Pandemic? Data From 26 Countries and Areas.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,谁的压力最大?来自 26 个国家和地区的数据。
提升女性在医疗保健和STEMM领域领导力的战略的全球视角。
Immunol Cell Biol. 2025 Mar;103(3):234-250. doi: 10.1111/imcb.12854. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
4
Disparities of women's authorship in Colombia: A cross-sectional analysis.哥伦比亚女性作者身份的差异:一项横断面分析。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jan 22;5(1):e0003972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003972. eCollection 2025.
5
Towards equal representation - A bibliometric analysis of authorships in Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Chemistry from the United States, Canada, and Europe (2005-2022).迈向平等代表性——对美国、加拿大和欧洲(2005 - 2022年)检验医学和临床化学领域作者身份的文献计量分析
Heliyon. 2024 May 16;10(10):e31411. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31411. eCollection 2024 May 30.
6
Effect of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic on Authorship Gender Disparities in the Ophthalmology Literature.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)大流行对眼科文献中作者性别差异的影响。
J Acad Ophthalmol (2017). 2023 Jan 17;15(1):e16-e23. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1760833. eCollection 2023 Jan.
7
Authorship of Publications Supported by NCI-Funded Grants Involving Low- and Middle-Income Countries.由 NCI 资助的涉及中低收入国家的出版物的作者身份。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e243215. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3215.
8
Analysis of gender representation, authorship inflation, and institutional affiliation in abstract acceptance: a 5-year study.摘要录用中性别呈现、作者署名膨胀及机构隶属关系分析:一项为期5年的研究
Global Surg Educ. 2023;2(1):37. doi: 10.1007/s44186-023-00105-9. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
9
Shortage and unequal distribution of infectious disease specialists in Japan: How can we refine the current situation?日本传染病专家短缺且分布不均:我们如何改善现状?
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 20;18(10):e0291677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291677. eCollection 2023.
10
Gender Equality Training for Students in Higher Education: Protocol for a Scoping Review.高等教育学生性别平等培训:范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Sep 20;12:e44584. doi: 10.2196/44584.
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2020 Dec;12(4):946-966. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12234. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
4
Dual-earner parent couples' work and care during COVID-19.双职工父母在新冠疫情期间的工作与照料情况。
Gend Work Organ. 2021 Jan;28(Suppl 1):66-79. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12497. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
5
COVID-19 and the gender gap in work hours.新冠疫情与工作时长的性别差距
Gend Work Organ. 2021 Jan;28(Suppl 1):101-112. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12506. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
6
Gender Equity Considerations for Tenure and Promotion during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间职称评定和晋升中的性别平等考量
Can Rev Sociol. 2020 Aug;57(3):502-515. doi: 10.1111/cars.12295. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
7
Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists.新冠疫情对科学家的不平等影响。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Sep;4(9):880-883. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0921-y.
8
Opinion: In the wake of COVID-19, academia needs new solutions to ensure gender equity.观点:在新冠疫情之后,学术界需要新的解决方案来确保性别平等。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 7;117(27):15378-15381. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010636117. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
9
COVID-19 medical papers have fewer women first authors than expected.COVID-19 医学论文中女性第一作者的数量低于预期。
Elife. 2020 Jun 15;9:e58807. doi: 10.7554/eLife.58807.
10
Where are the women? Gender inequalities in COVID-19 research authorship.女性都在哪里?新冠疫情研究作者身份中的性别不平等现象。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jul;5(7). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002922.