Suppr超能文献

印度各邦之间是否存在医疗支出公平性?基于全国抽样调查数据解释地区差异。

Does equity in healthcare spending exist among Indian states? Explaining regional variations from national sample survey data.

作者信息

Dwivedi Rinshu, Pradhan Jalandhar

机构信息

Research Scholar Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, Odisha, 769 008, India.

Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, Odisha, 769 008, India.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jan 14;16(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0517-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Equity and justice in healthcare payment form an integral part of health policy and planning. In the majority of low and middle-income countries (LMICs), healthcare inequalities are further aggravated by Out of Pocket Expenditure (OOPE). This paper examines the pattern of health equity and regional disparities in healthcare spending among Indian states by applying Andersen's behavioural model of healthcare utilization.

METHODS

The present study uses data from the 66 quinquennial round of Consumer Expenditure Survey, of the National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO), conducted in 2009-10 by Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI), Government of India (GoI). To measure equity and regional disparities in healthcare expenditure, states have been categorized under three heads on the basis of monthly OOPE i.e., Category A (OOPE > =INR 100); Category B (OOPE between INR 50 to 99) and Category C (OOPE < INR 50). Multiple Generalised Linear Regression Model (GLRM) has been employed to explore the effect of various socio-economic covariates on the level of OOPE.

RESULTS

The gap in the ratio of average healthcare spending between the poorest and richest households was maximum in Category A states (richest/poorest = 14.60), followed by Category B (richest/poorest 11.70) and Category C (richest/poorest 11.40). Results also indicate geographical concentration of lower level healthcare spending among Indian states (e.g., Odisha, Chhattisgarh and all the north-eastern states). Results from the multivariate analysis suggest that people residing in urban areas, having higher economic status, belonging to non-Muslim communities, non-Scheduled Tribes (STs), and non-poor households spend more on healthcare than their counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of various efforts by the government to reduce the burden of healthcare spending, widespread inequalities in healthcare expenditure are prevalent. Households with high healthcare needs (SCs/STs, and the poor) are in a more disadvantaged position in terms of spending on health care. It has also been observed that spending on healthcare was comparatively lower among backward or isolated states. No doubt, the overall social security measures should be enhanced, but at the same time, looking at the regional differences, more priority should be assigned to the disadvantaged states to reduce the burden of OOPE. It is proposed that there is need to increase government spending, especially for the disadvantaged states and population, to minimise the burden of OOPE.

摘要

背景

医疗支付中的公平与正义是卫生政策与规划的重要组成部分。在大多数低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),自付费用(OOPE)进一步加剧了医疗保健方面的不平等。本文通过应用安德森医疗保健利用行为模型,研究了印度各邦在医疗支出方面的健康公平模式和地区差异。

方法

本研究使用了印度政府统计与计划执行部(MoSPI)于2009 - 10年进行的全国抽样调查组织(NSSO)第66轮五年期消费者支出调查的数据。为了衡量医疗支出方面的公平性和地区差异,根据每月自付费用将各邦分为三类,即A类(自付费用≥100印度卢比);B类(自付费用在50至99印度卢比之间)和C类(自付费用<50印度卢比)。采用多元广义线性回归模型(GLRM)来探讨各种社会经济协变量对自付费用水平的影响。

结果

最贫困和最富裕家庭平均医疗支出比例的差距在A类邦最大(最富裕/最贫困 = 14.60),其次是B类邦(最富裕/最贫困11.70)和C类邦(最富裕/最贫困11.40)。结果还表明印度各邦中较低水平医疗支出存在地理集中现象(如奥里萨邦、恰蒂斯加尔邦和所有东北部邦)。多变量分析结果表明,居住在城市地区、经济状况较高、属于非穆斯林社区、非在册部落(STs)以及非贫困家庭的人在医疗保健方面的支出比其对应人群更多。

结论

尽管政府为减轻医疗支出负担做出了各种努力,但医疗支出方面广泛存在的不平等现象仍然普遍。在医疗保健支出方面,有高医疗需求的家庭(在册种姓/在册部落以及贫困人口)处于更为不利的地位。还观察到,落后或孤立的邦在医疗保健方面的支出相对较低。毫无疑问,应加强整体社会保障措施,但与此同时,考虑到地区差异,应更加优先关注处境不利的邦,以减轻自付费用负担。建议增加政府支出,特别是对处境不利的邦和人群,以尽量减少自付费用负担。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验