• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

协同教学加(CT+):在入门生物学课程的紧急远程教学中实施的及时、灵活和动态的课程设计。

Collaborative Teaching plus (CT+): A Timely, Flexible, and Dynamic Course Design Implemented during Emergency Remote Teaching in an Introductory Biology Course.

机构信息

Department of Molecular & Cell Biology, University of California, Merced, CA 95343.

Department of Biological Sciences, California State University, Stanislaus, Turlock, CA 95382.

出版信息

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022 Dec;21(4):ar61. doi: 10.1187/cbe.21-08-0199.

DOI:10.1187/cbe.21-08-0199
PMID:36112617
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9727617/
Abstract

Student-centered pedagogies promote student learning in college science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) classrooms. However, transitioning to active learning from traditional lecturing may be challenging for both students and instructors. This case study presents the development, implementation, and assessment of a modified collaborative teaching (CT) and team-based learning (TBL) approach (CT plus TBL, or CT+) in an introductory biology course at a Minority-Serving Institution. A logic model was formulated depicting the various assessment practices with the culminating goal of improving the student learning experience. We analyzed qualitative and quantitative data based on students and instructors' behaviors and discourse, and student midsemester and end-of-semester surveys. Our findings revealed that the integration of multiple instructors allowed for knowledge exchange in blending complementary behaviors and discourse practices during class sessions. In addition, the frequent ongoing assessments and incorporation of student feedback informed the CT+ design during both in-person and emergency remote teaching. Furthermore, this course design could be easily adapted to a variety of STEM courses in higher education, including remote instruction.

摘要

以学生为中心的教学法促进了大学理工科课堂中学生的学习。然而,对于学生和教师来说,从传统的讲授式教学向主动学习转变可能具有挑战性。本案例研究介绍了在一所少数族裔服务机构的入门生物学课程中,对改良的合作教学(CT)和基于团队的学习(TBL)方法(CT 加 TBL,或 CT+)的开发、实施和评估。制定了一个逻辑模型,描述了各种评估实践,最终目标是改善学生的学习体验。我们根据学生和教师的行为和话语以及学生在学期中和学期末的调查,分析了定性和定量数据。我们的发现表明,多位教师的整合允许在课堂上融合互补的行为和话语实践时进行知识交流。此外,频繁的持续评估和纳入学生反馈信息在面对面教学和紧急远程教学期间为 CT+的设计提供了依据。此外,这种课程设计可以很容易地适应于高等教育中的各种 STEM 课程,包括远程教学。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/514f/9727617/fab3d42bbc71/cbe-21-ar61-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/514f/9727617/90cbec5bd133/cbe-21-ar61-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/514f/9727617/275aa74044c6/cbe-21-ar61-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/514f/9727617/a3420b9e8d1a/cbe-21-ar61-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/514f/9727617/4d318662a95b/cbe-21-ar61-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/514f/9727617/8d63bf6d3ab8/cbe-21-ar61-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/514f/9727617/fab3d42bbc71/cbe-21-ar61-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/514f/9727617/90cbec5bd133/cbe-21-ar61-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/514f/9727617/275aa74044c6/cbe-21-ar61-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/514f/9727617/a3420b9e8d1a/cbe-21-ar61-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/514f/9727617/4d318662a95b/cbe-21-ar61-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/514f/9727617/8d63bf6d3ab8/cbe-21-ar61-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/514f/9727617/fab3d42bbc71/cbe-21-ar61-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Collaborative Teaching plus (CT+): A Timely, Flexible, and Dynamic Course Design Implemented during Emergency Remote Teaching in an Introductory Biology Course.协同教学加(CT+):在入门生物学课程的紧急远程教学中实施的及时、灵活和动态的课程设计。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2022 Dec;21(4):ar61. doi: 10.1187/cbe.21-08-0199.
2
PORTAAL: A Classroom Observation Tool Assessing Evidence-Based Teaching Practices for Active Learning in Large Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Classes.PORTAAL:一种课堂观察工具,用于评估在大型科学、技术、工程和数学课程中基于证据的主动学习教学实践。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2015 Summer;14(2):14:ar23. doi: 10.1187/cbe.14-06-0095. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
3
An exploration of the relationship between active learning and student motivation in STEM: a mixed methods study.主动学习与 STEM 学生动机关系的探索:混合方法研究。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2024 Sep 1;48(3):621-638. doi: 10.1152/advan.00247.2022. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
4
Evaluation of the effectiveness of student learning and teacher instruction on team-based learning during quality control of diagnostic imaging.在诊断影像学质量控制中,基于团队学习的学生学习和教师教学效果评价。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1732159. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1732159.
5
Look Who's Talking: Teaching and Discourse Practices across Discipline, Position, Experience, and Class Size in STEM College Classrooms.看看是谁在说话:理工科大学课堂中跨学科、职位、经验和班级规模的教学与话语实践
Bioscience. 2021 Aug 4;71(10):1063-1078. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biab077. eCollection 2021 Oct.
6
Active learning not associated with student learning in a random sample of college biology courses.主动学习与随机抽取的大学生物学课程样本中学生的学习无关。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2011 Winter;10(4):394-405. doi: 10.1187/cbe.11-07-0061.
7
If you are learner-centered and you know it, raise your hand: Perspectives on and implementation of pedagogical changes by science instructors during the COVID-19 pandemic.如果你是以学习者为中心,并且你知道这一点,请举手:新冠疫情期间科学教师对教学方法变革的看法及其实践。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2024 Jul-Aug;52(4):386-402. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21826. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
8
Community College Instructors' Perceptions of Constraints and Affordances Related to Teaching Quantitative Biology Skills and Concepts.社区学院教师对教授定量生物学技能和概念的限制因素和有利因素的看法。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Dec;18(4):ar64. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-01-0003.
9
Using Pathway Modeling to Evaluate and Improve Student-Centered Teaching Practices in Co-Taught College Science Courses.运用路径建模评估和改进合作式大学理科课程中的以学生为中心的教学实践。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Jun;20(2):es5. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-07-0147.
10
Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.主动学习可提高学生在科学、工程和数学领域的表现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 10;111(23):8410-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111. Epub 2014 May 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Faculty as reflective practitioners in emergency online teaching: an autoethnography.作为应急在线教学中反思性实践者的教师:一项自我民族志研究
Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2021;18(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s41239-021-00261-2. Epub 2021 May 17.
2
Look Who's Talking: Teaching and Discourse Practices across Discipline, Position, Experience, and Class Size in STEM College Classrooms.看看是谁在说话:理工科大学课堂中跨学科、职位、经验和班级规模的教学与话语实践
Bioscience. 2021 Aug 4;71(10):1063-1078. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biab077. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
Students' view on supportive co-teaching in medical sciences: a systematic review.
学生对医学科学中协作教学的看法:系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Oct 6;21(1):522. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02958-4.
4
Training Faculty as an Institutional Response to COVID-19 Emergency Remote Teaching Supported by Data.培训教师作为应对 COVID-19 紧急远程教学的机构响应,以数据为支撑。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Sep;20(3):ar34. doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-12-0277.
5
Nipped in the Bud: COVID-19 Reveals the Malleability of STEM Student Self-Efficacy.防微杜渐:新冠疫情揭示了 STEM 学生自我效能感的可塑。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Jun;20(2):ar25. doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-09-0206.
6
Interpret with Caution: COPUS Instructional Styles May Not Differ in Terms of Practices That Support Student Learning.谨慎解读:COPUS 教学风格在支持学生学习的实践方面可能没有差异。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Jun;20(2):ar26. doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-09-0218.
7
Comparison of Cluster Analysis Methodologies for Characterization of Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS) Data.比较分析方法在本科 STEM 课堂观察协议(COPUS)数据特征描述中的应用。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Mar;20(1):ar3. doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-04-0077.
8
A Pandemic Crash Course: Learning to Teach Equitably in Synchronous Online Classes.疫情下的速成课:学会在同步在线课堂中公平教学。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2020 Dec;19(4):ar60. doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-06-0126.
9
Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math.主动学习缩小了本科阶段科学、技术、工程和数学领域代表性不足学生的成绩差距。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 24;117(12):6476-6483. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1916903117. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
10
"What Will I Experience in My College STEM Courses?" An Investigation of Student Predictions about Instructional Practices in Introductory Courses.《我在大学 STEM 课程中会有什么体验?》——对学生对入门课程教学实践的预测的调查。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Dec;18(4):ar60. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-05-0084.