Watson Megan A, Anderson Clare, Karlic Kevin J, Hogan Cainnear K, Seelye Sarah, Taylor Stephanie P, Prescott Hallie C
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
University of Michigan Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Sep 13;4(9):e0766. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000766. eCollection 2022 Sep.
Survivors of sepsis hospitalization are at high risk for postsepsis morbidity, readmission, and death, but these negative outcomes can be mitigated by receipt of recommended care practices. We sought to assess factors associated with the receipt of recommended recovery-oriented care practices during hospitalization for sepsis. We hypothesized that patients treated in the ICU may be more likely than ward-treated patients to receive recommended care practices given the increasing focus on survivorship in the critical care field.
Observational cohort study.
Michigan Medicine, a tertiary academic medical center.
Adult patients discharged alive from a hospitalization with a primary diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock in 2019. We further limited our cohort to patients receiving longitudinal care viewable in the Michigan Medicine electronic health record to ensure ability to capture posthospital care and outcomes.
None.
Three-hundred sixty-five sepsis hospitalizations met study inclusion criteria. Using structured chart review, we determined receipt of the following recovery-based care practices during hospitalization: medication optimization, functional status evaluation at discharge, sepsis education, and scheduled follow-up within 2 weeks. The cohort was 46.6% female, 81.1% White, with a median age of 64 years. 51.2% were treated in the ICU. Medication optimization occurred in 93.7%, functional status evaluation in 82.7%, sepsis education in 20.0%, and scheduled follow-up within 2 weeks in 54.5%. ICU-treated patients had lower receipt of medication optimization and follow-up scheduling but greater receipt of functional and mental health status evaluations. In multivariable models, ICU treatment was associated with lower odds of receiving medication optimization (adjusted odds ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.03-0.69) and not associated with receipt of other care practices.
Our study shows incomplete receipt of recommended recovery-based care practices during sepsis hospitalization in both ward and ICU-treated patients. Sepsis education and mental health evaluation were particularly uncommon.
脓毒症住院幸存者发生脓毒症后发病、再入院和死亡的风险很高,但通过接受推荐的护理措施可以减轻这些不良后果。我们试图评估脓毒症住院期间接受以康复为导向的推荐护理措施的相关因素。我们假设,鉴于重症监护领域对患者生存的关注度不断提高,在重症监护病房(ICU)接受治疗的患者比在病房接受治疗的患者更有可能接受推荐的护理措施。
观察性队列研究。
密歇根大学医学中心,一家三级学术医疗中心。
2019年因脓毒症或脓毒性休克的初步诊断而住院并存活出院的成年患者。我们进一步将队列限制为在密歇根大学医学中心电子健康记录中可查看纵向护理的患者,以确保能够记录出院后护理和结果。
无。
365例脓毒症住院病例符合研究纳入标准。通过结构化病历审查,我们确定了住院期间接受以下基于康复的护理措施的情况:药物优化、出院时功能状态评估、脓毒症教育以及2周内的定期随访。该队列中女性占46.6%,白人占81.1%,中位年龄为64岁。51.2%在ICU接受治疗。93.7%的患者进行了药物优化,82.7%进行了功能状态评估,20.0%接受了脓毒症教育,54.5%在2周内进行了定期随访。在ICU接受治疗的患者中,药物优化和随访安排的接受率较低,但功能和心理健康状态评估的接受率较高。在多变量模型中,ICU治疗与接受药物优化的几率较低相关(调整后的优势比为0.72;95%可信区间为-0.03至0.69),与接受其他护理措施无关。
我们的研究表明,在病房和ICU接受治疗的患者中,脓毒症住院期间接受推荐的基于康复的护理措施的情况并不完整。脓毒症教育和心理健康评估尤其少见。