Suppr超能文献

在基于人群的调查中研究性取向和性别多样化伴侣关系的测量机会。

Measurement opportunities for studying sexual and gender diverse partnerships in population-based surveys.

作者信息

Julian Christopher A, Manning Wendy D, Dush Claire M Kamp

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Center for Family and Demographic Research, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio, USA.

Department of Sociology, Minnesota Population Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Marriage Fam. 2024 Oct;86(5):1410-1431. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12957. Epub 2024 Jan 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This article outlines for family scholars and researchers designing surveys or searching for data on sexual and gender-diverse (SGD) families the latest methodological advancements in United States population-based surveys for studying SGD partnerships by reviewing five recently collected, publicly available, population-representative data sets.

BACKGROUND

LGBTQIA+ adults and SGD partnerships are an expanding demographic group in the United States. Yet, measurement limitations have restricted studies of these partnerships that use population-based studies. To address this issue, researchers designing population-representative data collections have adopted new strategies to measure SGD partnerships accurately. However, most population representative surveys continue to lack data on growing segments of the LGBTQIA+ population by relying solely on the sex of partners or limited sexual and gender identity measures.

CONCLUSION

We recommend expanding population-based surveys to incorporate inclusive measures of sexual and gender identity, directly asking about the gender composition of a couple and measurement of cohabiting and other nonmarital relationships. These approaches are especially important for understanding relationships among younger populations who do not follow heteronormative relationship trajectories and hold diverse gender and sexual identities.

IMPLICATIONS

Although the research opportunities on SGD individuals and partnerships are expanding; researchers must remain mindful of the limitations of current data sets and advocate for updates to the United States population data infrastructure.

摘要

目的

本文通过回顾五个最近收集的、公开可用的、具有人口代表性的数据集,为家庭学者和研究人员概述美国基于人口的调查中研究性与性别多样化(SGD)家庭伙伴关系的最新方法进展,这些学者和研究人员正在设计调查或寻找关于SGD家庭的数据。

背景

在美国,女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿、双性人及其他性少数群体(LGBTQIA+)成年人和SGD伙伴关系构成的人口群体正在扩大。然而,测量限制阻碍了对这些伙伴关系的基于人口研究。为解决这一问题,设计具有人口代表性数据收集的研究人员采用了新策略来准确测量SGD伙伴关系。然而,大多数具有人口代表性的调查仅依靠伴侣性别或有限的性与性别认同测量方法,仍然缺乏关于LGBTQIA+人口不断增长部分的数据。

结论

我们建议扩大基于人口的调查,纳入性与性别认同的包容性测量方法,直接询问伴侣的性别构成以及对同居和其他非婚姻关系的测量。这些方法对于理解不遵循异性恋规范关系轨迹且拥有多样性别和性取向认同的年轻人群体之间的关系尤为重要。

启示

尽管关于SGD个体和伙伴关系的研究机会在不断增加;研究人员必须牢记当前数据集的局限性,并倡导更新美国人口数据基础设施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac9/11530211/b4feade8e07c/nihms-1950622-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Measurement opportunities for studying sexual and gender diverse partnerships in population-based surveys.
J Marriage Fam. 2024 Oct;86(5):1410-1431. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12957. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
2
"": A Thematic Analysis of Autistic LGBTQIA+ Identity and Inclusion in the LGBTQIA+ Community.
Autism Adulthood. 2023 Jun 1;5(2):127-138. doi: 10.1089/aut.2021.0074. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
6
What Is the Representation of Sexual and Gender Minority Identities Among Orthopaedic Professionals in the United States?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Aug 1;482(8):1313-1321. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003079. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
7
Sexuality and Gender Diversity Among Adolescents in Australia, 2019-2021.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2444187. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44187.
8
10
What Category Best Fits: Understanding Transgender Identity in a Survey of Autistic Individuals.
Autism Adulthood. 2023 Jun 1;5(2):204-209. doi: 10.1089/aut.2021.0079. Epub 2023 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping diversity in gender identity and gender roles across sex and age in the Dutch general population: a large-scale cohort study.
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jul 28;86:103359. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103359. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
A Brief Report Comparing Younger and Older Cohabitors.
J Marriage Fam. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1111/jomf.13128.
3
Marginalized Identities, Healthcare Discrimination, and Parental Stress about COVID-19.
J Marriage Fam. 2025 Feb;87(1):258-279. doi: 10.1111/jomf.13023. Epub 2024 Jul 7.
4
A national portrait of the well-being of remarried and previously married cohabiting older adults.
Aging Ment Health. 2025 Apr;29(4):714-725. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2024.2438834. Epub 2024 Dec 11.

本文引用的文献

2
National Couples' Health and Time Study: Sample, Design, and Weighting.
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2023 Aug;42(4). doi: 10.1007/s11113-023-09799-7. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
4
Contextual Influences on Nonresponse to Health Survey Questions About Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity.
LGBT Health. 2024 Jan;11(1):66-73. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2022.0320. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
5
Cohabitation and Marriage Among Same-Sex Couples in the 2019 ACS and CPS: A Research Note.
Demography. 2022 Oct 1;59(5):1595-1605. doi: 10.1215/00703370-10181474.
6
Transgender data collection in the electronic health record: Current concepts and issues.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Jan 12;29(2):271-284. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab136.
7
Exploring the Q in LGBTQ: Demographic characteristic and sexuality of Queer people in a U.S. representative sample of sexual minorities.
Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2020 Mar;7(1):101-112. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000359. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
9
Sexual- and Gender-Minority Families: A 2010 to 2020 Decade in Review.
J Marriage Fam. 2020 Feb;82(1):300-325. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12607. Epub 2020 Jan 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验