• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在基于人群的调查中研究性取向和性别多样化伴侣关系的测量机会。

Measurement opportunities for studying sexual and gender diverse partnerships in population-based surveys.

作者信息

Julian Christopher A, Manning Wendy D, Dush Claire M Kamp

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Center for Family and Demographic Research, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio, USA.

Department of Sociology, Minnesota Population Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Marriage Fam. 2024 Oct;86(5):1410-1431. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12957. Epub 2024 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1111/jomf.12957
PMID:39493466
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11530211/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This article outlines for family scholars and researchers designing surveys or searching for data on sexual and gender-diverse (SGD) families the latest methodological advancements in United States population-based surveys for studying SGD partnerships by reviewing five recently collected, publicly available, population-representative data sets.

BACKGROUND

LGBTQIA+ adults and SGD partnerships are an expanding demographic group in the United States. Yet, measurement limitations have restricted studies of these partnerships that use population-based studies. To address this issue, researchers designing population-representative data collections have adopted new strategies to measure SGD partnerships accurately. However, most population representative surveys continue to lack data on growing segments of the LGBTQIA+ population by relying solely on the sex of partners or limited sexual and gender identity measures.

CONCLUSION

We recommend expanding population-based surveys to incorporate inclusive measures of sexual and gender identity, directly asking about the gender composition of a couple and measurement of cohabiting and other nonmarital relationships. These approaches are especially important for understanding relationships among younger populations who do not follow heteronormative relationship trajectories and hold diverse gender and sexual identities.

IMPLICATIONS

Although the research opportunities on SGD individuals and partnerships are expanding; researchers must remain mindful of the limitations of current data sets and advocate for updates to the United States population data infrastructure.

摘要

目的

本文通过回顾五个最近收集的、公开可用的、具有人口代表性的数据集,为家庭学者和研究人员概述美国基于人口的调查中研究性与性别多样化(SGD)家庭伙伴关系的最新方法进展,这些学者和研究人员正在设计调查或寻找关于SGD家庭的数据。

背景

在美国,女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿、双性人及其他性少数群体(LGBTQIA+)成年人和SGD伙伴关系构成的人口群体正在扩大。然而,测量限制阻碍了对这些伙伴关系的基于人口研究。为解决这一问题,设计具有人口代表性数据收集的研究人员采用了新策略来准确测量SGD伙伴关系。然而,大多数具有人口代表性的调查仅依靠伴侣性别或有限的性与性别认同测量方法,仍然缺乏关于LGBTQIA+人口不断增长部分的数据。

结论

我们建议扩大基于人口的调查,纳入性与性别认同的包容性测量方法,直接询问伴侣的性别构成以及对同居和其他非婚姻关系的测量。这些方法对于理解不遵循异性恋规范关系轨迹且拥有多样性别和性取向认同的年轻人群体之间的关系尤为重要。

启示

尽管关于SGD个体和伙伴关系的研究机会在不断增加;研究人员必须牢记当前数据集的局限性,并倡导更新美国人口数据基础设施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac9/11530211/2847e6fa5e46/nihms-1950622-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac9/11530211/b4feade8e07c/nihms-1950622-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac9/11530211/c60df7920ba5/nihms-1950622-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac9/11530211/7a32cc389984/nihms-1950622-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac9/11530211/c65c4565a9ac/nihms-1950622-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac9/11530211/e35809d24f42/nihms-1950622-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac9/11530211/f429514aa50c/nihms-1950622-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac9/11530211/2847e6fa5e46/nihms-1950622-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac9/11530211/b4feade8e07c/nihms-1950622-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac9/11530211/c60df7920ba5/nihms-1950622-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac9/11530211/7a32cc389984/nihms-1950622-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac9/11530211/c65c4565a9ac/nihms-1950622-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac9/11530211/e35809d24f42/nihms-1950622-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac9/11530211/f429514aa50c/nihms-1950622-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ac9/11530211/2847e6fa5e46/nihms-1950622-f0007.jpg

相似文献

1
Measurement opportunities for studying sexual and gender diverse partnerships in population-based surveys.在基于人群的调查中研究性取向和性别多样化伴侣关系的测量机会。
J Marriage Fam. 2024 Oct;86(5):1410-1431. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12957. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
2
"": A Thematic Analysis of Autistic LGBTQIA+ Identity and Inclusion in the LGBTQIA+ Community.《自闭症LGBTQIA+身份认同与在LGBTQIA+社群中的包容:一项主题分析》
Autism Adulthood. 2023 Jun 1;5(2):127-138. doi: 10.1089/aut.2021.0074. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
3
Responses to Sexual and Gender Identity Measures in Population-Level Data by Birth Cohort: A Research Note.出生队列人群水平数据中对性和性别认同测量的反应:研究说明。
Demography. 2024 Feb 1;61(1):15-30. doi: 10.1215/00703370-11164985.
4
Recommendations for Promoting the Health and Well-being of Sexual and Gender-diverse Adolescents Through Supportive Families and Affirming Support Networks.促进性与性别多样化青少年健康与幸福的建议:通过支持性家庭和肯定性支持网络。
J Adolesc Health. 2022 Apr;70(4):692-696. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.01.124. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
5
An Exploration of the Experiences of Physical Therapists Who Identify as LGBTQIA+: Navigating Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Clinical, Academic, and Professional Roles.探索认同 LGBTQIA+的物理治疗师的经历:在临床、学术和专业角色中应对性取向和性别认同。
Phys Ther. 2022 Mar 1;102(3). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab280.
6
What Is the Representation of Sexual and Gender Minority Identities Among Orthopaedic Professionals in the United States?美国矫形外科专业人员中的性少数群体和性别少数群体认同的代表性如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Aug 1;482(8):1313-1321. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003079. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
7
Sexuality and Gender Diversity Among Adolescents in Australia, 2019-2021.澳大利亚青少年 2019-2021 年的性与性别多样性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2444187. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44187.
8
Prevalence, severity and risk factors of psychiatric disorders amongst sexual and gender diverse young people during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.性与性别多样化的年轻人在 COVID-19 大流行期间的精神障碍的患病率、严重程度和危险因素:系统评价。
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2024 Jul;29(3):1213-1227. doi: 10.1177/13591045241229751. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
9
The Committed Intimate Partnerships of Incarcerated African-American Men: Implications for Sexual HIV Transmission Risk and Prevention Opportunities.被监禁的非裔美国男性的忠诚亲密伴侣关系:对性传播艾滋病毒风险及预防机会的影响
Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Oct;46(7):2173-2185. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0916-y. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
10
What Category Best Fits: Understanding Transgender Identity in a Survey of Autistic Individuals.最适合的类别:在自闭症个体调查中理解跨性别身份
Autism Adulthood. 2023 Jun 1;5(2):204-209. doi: 10.1089/aut.2021.0079. Epub 2023 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping diversity in gender identity and gender roles across sex and age in the Dutch general population: a large-scale cohort study.荷兰普通人群中性别认同和性别角色在性别与年龄方面的多样性映射:一项大规模队列研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jul 28;86:103359. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103359. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
A Brief Report Comparing Younger and Older Cohabitors.比较年轻和年长同居者的简要报告。
J Marriage Fam. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1111/jomf.13128.
3
Marginalized Identities, Healthcare Discrimination, and Parental Stress about COVID-19.

本文引用的文献

1
Responses to Sexual and Gender Identity Measures in Population-Level Data by Birth Cohort: A Research Note.出生队列人群水平数据中对性和性别认同测量的反应:研究说明。
Demography. 2024 Feb 1;61(1):15-30. doi: 10.1215/00703370-11164985.
2
National Couples' Health and Time Study: Sample, Design, and Weighting.全国夫妻健康与时间研究:样本、设计与加权
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2023 Aug;42(4). doi: 10.1007/s11113-023-09799-7. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
3
Has There Been a Transgender Tipping Point? Gender Identification Differences in U.S. Cohorts Born between 1935 and 2001.
边缘化身份、医疗保健歧视以及父母对新冠疫情的压力
J Marriage Fam. 2025 Feb;87(1):258-279. doi: 10.1111/jomf.13023. Epub 2024 Jul 7.
4
A national portrait of the well-being of remarried and previously married cohabiting older adults.一份关于再婚及曾有过同居经历的老年人幸福状况的全国性描述。
Aging Ment Health. 2025 Apr;29(4):714-725. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2024.2438834. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
是否存在跨性别临界点?1935年至2001年出生的美国队列中的性别认同差异。
AJS. 2022 Jul;128(1):94-143. doi: 10.1086/719714.
4
Contextual Influences on Nonresponse to Health Survey Questions About Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity.关于性取向和性别认同的健康调查问题无应答的情境影响。
LGBT Health. 2024 Jan;11(1):66-73. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2022.0320. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
5
Cohabitation and Marriage Among Same-Sex Couples in the 2019 ACS and CPS: A Research Note.2019 年 ACS 和 CPS 中同性伴侣的同居和婚姻:研究注释。
Demography. 2022 Oct 1;59(5):1595-1605. doi: 10.1215/00703370-10181474.
6
Transgender data collection in the electronic health record: Current concepts and issues.电子健康记录中的跨性别数据采集:当前概念和问题。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Jan 12;29(2):271-284. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab136.
7
Exploring the Q in LGBTQ: Demographic characteristic and sexuality of Queer people in a U.S. representative sample of sexual minorities.探索LGBTQ群体中的酷儿群体:美国性少数群体代表性样本中酷儿群体的人口特征与性取向
Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2020 Mar;7(1):101-112. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000359. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
8
Measuring Marriage and Cohabitation: Assessing Same-Sex Relationship Status in the Current Population Survey.测量婚姻和同居:评估当前人口调查中的同性关系状况。
Demography. 2021 Jun 1;58(3):811-820. doi: 10.1215/00703370-9162213.
9
Sexual- and Gender-Minority Families: A 2010 to 2020 Decade in Review.性少数和性别少数群体家庭:2010 年至 2020 年十年回顾
J Marriage Fam. 2020 Feb;82(1):300-325. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12607. Epub 2020 Jan 5.
10
What Sexual and Gender Minority People Want Researchers to Know About Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Questions: A Qualitative Study.性少数群体(Sexual and Gender Minority,SGM)希望研究人员了解关于性取向和性别认同问题的研究:一项定性研究。
Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Oct;49(7):2301-2318. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01810-y. Epub 2020 Sep 1.