Suppr超能文献

钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白 2(SGLT2)抑制剂、肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)抑制剂和血管紧张素受体拮抗剂(ARN)抑制剂对心力衰竭的心血管影响。

The cardiovascular effects of SGLT2 inhibitors, RAS inhibitors, and ARN inhibitors in heart failure.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Shan Xi Medical University Second Hospital, Shan Xi Medical University, Tai Yuan, Shan Xi, China.

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Shan Xi Medical University, Tai Yuan, Shan Xi, China.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Apr;10(2):1314-1325. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14298. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

Abstract

AIMS

No studies have comprehensively compared the efficacy of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor neprilysin (ARN) inhibitors based on different type of heart failure, including heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The aim of this network meta-analysis was to evaluate the relative efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), RAS inhibitor (RASi) and ARN inhibitor (ARNI) in different types of heart failure.

METHODS

A systemic literature search was performed from inception to 19 November 2022 for randomized control trials assessing the risk of cardiovascular (CV) death or hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) of these drugs in HF. A network meta-analysis was performed. Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were synthesized.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were selected with a total of 61 489 patients. In patients with HFrEF, ARNI led to a reduced risk of a composite outcome of CV death or HHF when compared with placebo (RR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.77-0.89). Similar trends were observed when focusing on the outcome of CV death or HHF alone. In patients with HFpEF, SGLT2i showed the beneficial effects on the CV death or HHF events when compared with placebo and RASi (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.92; RR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.31). For CV death, all these three drugs could not show beneficial effects in HFpEF. For the incidence of HHF in HFpEF, both SGLT2i and ARNI demonstrated the beneficial effects but SGLT2i was superior to ARNI. There were no differences in the events of discontinuation under these drugs when compared with placebo or each other in either HFrEF or HFpEF patients. SGLT2i showed the least renal injury among these interventions in HFrEF and there were no differences in the incidence of renal injury of these interventions in HFpEF.

CONCLUSIONS

Among these drugs, ARNI showed the greatest ability to lower the incidence of CV death or HHF and SGLT2i exerted the least renal injury in patients with HFrEF. In patients with HFpEF, SGLT2i was associated with a reduction in the risk of CV death or HHF. There were no differences in the incidence of renal injury of these interventions in HFpEF. The intolerance of these drugs were comparable in both HFrEF and HFpEF.

摘要

目的

目前尚无研究综合比较钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2(SGLT2)抑制剂、肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)抑制剂和血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂(ARN)在不同类型心力衰竭(射血分数降低的心力衰竭,HFrEF;射血分数保留的心力衰竭,HFpEF)中的疗效。本网络荟萃分析旨在评估 SGLT2 抑制剂(SGLT2i)、RAS 抑制剂(RASi)和 ARN 抑制剂(ARNI)在不同类型心力衰竭中的相对疗效。

方法

从研究开始到 2022 年 11 月 19 日,我们对评估这些药物在心力衰竭中发生心血管(CV)死亡或心力衰竭住院(HHF)风险的随机对照试验进行了系统文献检索。我们进行了网络荟萃分析。合成风险比(RR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

共纳入 17 项研究,总计 61489 例患者。在 HFrEF 患者中,与安慰剂相比,ARN 降低了 CV 死亡或 HHF 的复合结局风险(RR=0.83,95%CI 0.77-0.89)。当仅关注 CV 死亡或 HHF 这一结局时,也观察到了类似的趋势。在 HFpEF 患者中,与安慰剂和 RASi 相比,SGLT2i 对 CV 死亡或 HHF 事件具有有益作用(RR=0.82,95%CI 0.74-0.92;RR=1.16,95%CI 1.02-1.31)。对于 CV 死亡,这三种药物在 HFpEF 中均未显示出有益作用。对于 HFpEF 中 HHF 的发生率,SGLT2i 和 ARNI 均显示出有益作用,但 SGLT2i 优于 ARNI。在 HFrEF 或 HFpEF 患者中,与安慰剂相比,或与彼此相比,这些药物在停药事件方面没有差异。在 HFrEF 中,SGLT2i 是这些干预措施中引起肾脏损伤最小的药物,HFpEF 中这些干预措施引起肾脏损伤的发生率没有差异。

结论

在这些药物中,ARN 降低 CV 死亡或 HHF 发生率的能力最强,而 SGLT2i 在 HFrEF 患者中引起的肾脏损伤最小。在 HFpEF 患者中,SGLT2i 与降低 CV 死亡或 HHF 风险相关。HFpEF 中这些干预措施引起肾脏损伤的发生率没有差异。在 HFrEF 和 HFpEF 中,这些药物的不耐受性相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8040/10053170/d43c190c16e2/EHF2-10-1314-g004.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验