Wang Yulin, Vantieghem Iris, Dong Debo, Nemegeer Johan, De Mey Johan, Van Schuerbeek Peter, Marinazzo Daniele, Vandekerckhove Marie
Department of Clinical and Lifespan Psychology, Faculty of Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Data Analysis, Faculty of Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Brain Sci. 2022 Sep 9;12(9):1215. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12091215.
The current study investigated the bottom-up experiential emotion regulation in comparison to the cognitiveve top down-approach of cognitive defusion. Rooted in an experiential- and client-centered psychotherapeutic approach, experiential emotion regulation involves an active, non-intervening, accepting, open and welcoming approach towards the bodily felt affective experience in a welcoming, compassionate way, expressed in 'experiential awareness' in a first phase, and its verbalization or 'experiential expression' in a second phase. Defusion refers to the ability to observe one's thoughts and feelings in a detached manner. Nineteen healthy participants completed an emotion regulation task during fMRI scanning by processing highly arousing negative events by images. Both experiential emotion regulation and cognitive defusion resulted in higher negative emotion compared to a 'watch' control condition. On the neurophysiological level, experiential emotion regulation recruited brain areas that regulate attention towards affective- and somatosensorial experience such as the anterior cingulate cortex, the paracingulate gyrus, the inferior frontal gyrus, and the prefrontal pole, areas underlying multisensory information integration (e.g., angular gyrus), and linking body states to emotion recognition and awareness (e.g., postcentral gyrus). Experiential emotion regulation, relative to the control condition, also resulted in a higher interaction between the anterior insular cortex and left amygdala while participants experienced less negative emotion. Cognitive defusion decreased activation in the subcortical areas such as the brainstem, the thalamus, the amygdala, and the hippocampus. In contrast to cognitive defusion, experiential emotion regulation relative to demonstrated greater activation in the left angular gyrus, indicating more multisensory information integration. These findings provide insight into different and specific neural networks underlying psychotherapy-based experiential emotion regulation and cognitive defusion.
本研究将自下而上的体验式情绪调节与认知解离的自上而下认知方法进行了比较。体验式情绪调节植根于以体验和来访者为中心的心理治疗方法,它以一种接纳、开放和包容的方式,积极、不干预地接纳身体所感受到的情感体验,在第一阶段表现为“体验性觉察”,在第二阶段表现为言语化或“体验性表达”。解离是指以超然的方式观察自己的想法和感受的能力。19名健康参与者在功能磁共振成像扫描期间完成了一项情绪调节任务,通过处理高度唤起负面情绪的图像。与“观看”对照条件相比,体验式情绪调节和认知解离均导致更高的负面情绪。在神经生理学层面,体验式情绪调节激活了调节对情感和躯体感觉体验注意力的脑区,如前扣带回皮质、旁扣带回、额下回和前额叶极,这些区域是多感官信息整合的基础(如角回),并将身体状态与情绪识别和觉察联系起来(如中央后回)。相对于对照条件,体验式情绪调节在参与者体验到较少负面情绪时,还导致前岛叶皮质和左侧杏仁核之间有更高的交互作用。认知解离降低了脑干、丘脑、杏仁核和海马体等皮质下区域的激活水平。与认知解离相反,体验式情绪调节在左侧角回显示出更大的激活,表明有更多的多感官信息整合。这些发现为基于心理治疗的体验式情绪调节和认知解离背后不同且特定的神经网络提供了见解。