Stefaniak Izabela, Hanusz Krzysztof, Mierzejewski Paweł, Bieńkowski Przemysław, Parnowski Tadeusz, Murawiec Sławomir
First Department of Psychiatry Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, 02-957 Warsaw, Poland.
Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 00-378 Warsaw, Poland.
Brain Sci. 2022 Sep 13;12(9):1236. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12091236.
Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is one of the most frequent mental disorders. Exposure to virtual reality can be a solution complementing standard CBT (cognitive-behavioral therapy) or can be used as an independent therapeutic tool. The study's objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of using self-administered virtual reality exposure vs. CBT and CBT with virtual exposure. We assessed the efficacy of the applied intervention with the Leibowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS). We compared three groups: CBT ( = 25), CBT + VR ( = 29), and self-administered therapy without aid of a therapist ( = 19). The results indicated that all three groups showed changes on the LSAS. The simple effect analysis showed that there were no differences between experimental conditions at T0 (session 1) and T1 (session 9) and that the only significant difference occurred at T2 (session 14). The pairwise comparisons showed that the participants in the VR condition scored higher on the LSAS score during the measurement at T2 than participants in CBT condition. Our study has several limitations. The presented initial study shows that the methods of CBT for social anxiety used so far are also effective, while the VR tool for self-therapy requires further research.
社交焦虑障碍(SAD)是最常见的精神障碍之一。接触虚拟现实可以作为补充标准认知行为疗法(CBT)的一种解决方案,或者可以用作一种独立的治疗工具。该研究的目的是评估自我管理的虚拟现实暴露与CBT以及结合虚拟现实暴露的CBT的安全性和有效性。我们使用莱博维茨社交焦虑量表(LSAS)评估了所应用干预措施的有效性。我们比较了三组:CBT组(n = 25)、CBT + VR组(n = 29)和无治疗师协助的自我管理治疗组(n = 19)。结果表明,所有三组在LSAS上均有变化。简单效应分析表明,在T0(第1次治疗)和T1(第9次治疗)时实验条件之间没有差异,唯一显著差异出现在T2(第14次治疗)时。两两比较表明,在T2测量期间,虚拟现实条件下的参与者在LSAS评分上高于CBT条件下的参与者。我们的研究有几个局限性。所呈现的初步研究表明,迄今为止使用的社交焦虑CBT方法也是有效的,而用于自我治疗的虚拟现实工具需要进一步研究。