Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情健康认证的行为反应:快速综述。

Behavioural responses to Covid-19 health certification: a rapid review.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.

Swansea University, Population Data Science, Swansea, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 24;21(1):1205. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11166-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Covid-status certification - certificates for those who test negative for the SARS-CoV-2 virus, test positive for antibodies, or who have been vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 - has been proposed to enable safer access to a range of activities. Realising these benefits will depend in part upon the behavioural and social impacts of certification. The aim of this rapid review was to describe public attitudes towards certification, and its possible impact on uptake of testing and vaccination, protective behaviours, and crime.

METHOD

A search was undertaken in peer-reviewed databases, pre-print databases, and the grey literature, from 2000 to December 2020. Studies were included if they measured attitudes towards or behavioural consequences of health certificates based on one of three indices of Covid-19 status: test-negative result for current infectiousness, test-positive for antibodies conferring natural immunity, or vaccination(s) conferring immunity.

RESULTS

Thirty-three papers met the inclusion criteria, only three of which were rated as low risk of bias. Public attitudes were generally favourable towards the use of immunity certificates for international travel, but unfavourable towards their use for access to work and other activities. A significant minority was strongly opposed to the use of certificates of immunity for any purpose. The limited evidence suggested that intention to get vaccinated varied with the activity enabled by certification or vaccination (e.g., international travel). Where vaccination is seen as compulsory this could lead to unwillingness to accept a subsequent vaccination. There was some evidence that restricting access to settings and activities to those with antibody test certificates may lead to deliberate exposure to infection in a minority. Behaviours that reduce transmission may decrease upon health certificates based on any of the three indices of Covid-19 status, including physical distancing and handwashing.

CONCLUSIONS

The limited evidence suggests that health certification in relation to COVID-19 - outside of the context of international travel - has the potential for harm as well as benefit. Realising the benefits while minimising the harms will require real-time evaluations allowing modifications to maximise the potential contribution of certification to enable safer access to a range of activities.

摘要

背景

新冠病毒状态认证 - 针对那些新冠病毒检测结果为阴性、新冠病毒抗体检测结果为阳性或已接种新冠病毒疫苗的人颁发的证书 - 旨在使人们能够更安全地参与一系列活动。这些益处的实现在一定程度上取决于认证对行为和社会的影响。本快速综述的目的是描述公众对认证的态度,以及其对检测和疫苗接种、保护行为和犯罪的潜在影响。

方法

从 2000 年至 2020 年 12 月,在同行评议数据库、预印本数据库和灰色文献中进行了检索。如果研究测量了基于新冠病毒状态的三个指标之一的健康证书的态度或行为后果,则将其纳入研究:当前传染性检测阴性结果、抗体检测阳性结果(自然免疫)或疫苗接种(免疫)。

结果

符合纳入标准的论文有 33 篇,只有 3 篇被评为低偏倚风险。公众对使用免疫证书进行国际旅行的态度普遍较为积极,但对将其用于工作和其他活动的态度则较为消极。少数人强烈反对出于任何目的使用免疫证书。有限的证据表明,接种疫苗的意愿因认证或疫苗接种所带来的活动而有所不同(例如,国际旅行)。如果接种疫苗被视为强制性的,这可能会导致不愿意接受后续的疫苗接种。有一些证据表明,将抗体检测证书限制在仅允许那些有抗体检测证书的人进入某些场所和活动,可能会导致少数人故意感染。基于新冠病毒状态的三种指标中的任何一种,包括保持身体距离和勤洗手等行为,可能会减少传播。

结论

有限的证据表明,新冠病毒认证 - 除国际旅行之外 - 具有潜在的益处和危害。为了实现益处,同时减少危害,需要进行实时评估,以便对认证进行修改,以最大程度地发挥认证的潜力,使人们能够更安全地参与一系列活动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/433d/8223293/07d156c9d78f/12889_2021_11166_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验