Suppr超能文献

2020 年瑞士日内瓦的一项定性研究:对 COVID-19 证书的可接受性。

Acceptability of COVID-19 Certificates: A Qualitative Study in Geneva, Switzerland, in 2020.

机构信息

Geneva School of Social Sciences, Institute of Sociological Research, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Division and Department of Primary Care Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 17;9:682365. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.682365. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Immunity certificates related to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been under discussion since the beginning of the pandemic with conflicting opinions. In order to identify arguments in favor of and against the possible implementation of documents certifying immunity of an individual based on serological testing, we developed a qualitative study in Geneva, Switzerland. The study took place between two lockdowns with a sense of semi-normalcy during summer 2020 in Switzerland but at a time when no vaccine was available and seroprevalence was below 21%. Eleven focus groups with members of the public and 14 semi-structured interviews with stakeholders were conducted between July and November 2020, with a total of 68 participants with an age range between 24 and 77 years. Interviews and focus groups transcripts were coded with the ATLAS.ti CAQDAS. Few participants considered immunity certificates based on serological testing as an acceptable public health measure. Major concerns included the reliability of scientific data related to COVID-19 immunity and serological testing potential re-infection as well as the possibility that the use of certificates could result in deleterious outcomes. Discrimination, counterfeiting, incitement for self-infection, invasion of the private sphere, violation of personal integrity, and violation of medical secrecy were perceived as the major risks. Benefits of immunity certificates were more perceived when in relation to vaccination, and included gains in medical knowledge and protection in certain contexts involving leisure or work-related activities. The consequences of implementing immunity certificates are numerous, and the acceptability by the general population has to be considered when engaging in such policy. Even if the results provide a snapshot of arguments discussed around immunity certificates based on serological testing before the implementation of the COVID-19 vaccine, most of the issues discussed are central in the current debates about vaccination certificates.

摘要

自疫情开始以来,人们一直在讨论与严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型(SARS-CoV-2)相关的免疫证书,对此存在意见分歧。为了确定基于血清学检测证明个体免疫的文件可能实施的有利和不利论据,我们在瑞士日内瓦开展了一项定性研究。该研究于 2020 年夏季在瑞士两次封锁期间进行,当时社会处于半正常状态,但尚未推出疫苗,血清流行率低于 21%。2020 年 7 月至 11 月期间,我们共进行了 11 次公众焦点小组和 14 次利益攸关方半结构化访谈,共有 68 名年龄在 24 岁至 77 岁之间的参与者参与。使用 ATLAS.ti CAQDAS 对访谈和焦点小组记录进行编码。很少有参与者认为基于血清学检测的免疫证书是一种可以接受的公共卫生措施。主要关注包括与 COVID-19 免疫和血清学检测潜在再感染相关的科学数据的可靠性,以及使用证书可能导致有害后果的可能性。歧视、伪造、煽动自我感染、侵犯隐私、侵犯个人完整性和侵犯医疗保密被视为主要风险。当与疫苗接种相关时,免疫证书的好处更容易被感知,包括在某些涉及休闲或工作相关活动的情况下增加医学知识和保护。实施免疫证书的后果很多,在制定此类政策时,必须考虑到公众的接受程度。即使这些结果提供了在 COVID-19 疫苗实施之前基于血清学检测的免疫证书讨论论据的快照,但讨论的大多数问题在当前关于疫苗接种证书的辩论中都是核心问题。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Immunity certification for COVID-19: ethical considerations.新冠病毒感染免疫认证:伦理考量。
Bull World Health Organ. 2021 Feb 1;99(2):155-161. doi: 10.2471/BLT.20.280701. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
4
Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after the second pandemic peak.第二次疫情高峰后抗SARS-CoV-2抗体的血清阳性率。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 May;21(5):600-601. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00054-2. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
5
Antibody Testing in the context of COVID-19 and Return to Work.新冠疫情背景下的抗体检测与复工
Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2020 May-Aug;24(2):51-54. doi: 10.4103/ijoem.IJOEM_276_20. Epub 2020 Aug 19.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验