• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂类抗抑郁药治疗暴饮暴食症的疗效及可接受性比较:一项网状Meta分析。

Comparative efficacy and acceptability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants for binge eating disorder: A network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Duan Hanying, Zhu Lijun, Li Min, Zhang Xinyue, Zhang Beilin, Fang Shaokuan

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Centre, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 6;13:949823. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.949823. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2022.949823
PMID:36147335
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9486087/
Abstract

There are several selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants currently used to treat binge eating disorder (BED), but the efficacy and acceptability of these antidepressants are still controversial. Therefore, we designed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy and acceptability of different SSRI antidepressants for the treatment of BED. Four databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched for the eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for the treatment of patients with BED. The analysis was performed with Stata16 software. 9 RCTs were included in this NMA. The results of the study showed that compared with placebo, sertraline and fluoxetine could significantly reduce the frequency of binge eating. Fluoxetine was shown to be the drug with the greatest reduction in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) score. Besides, all SSRI antidepressants were ineffective in losing weight. In addition, all the investigated antidepressants were found to be well acceptable in regards to the acceptability reflected by the dropout rate. As far as both efficacy and acceptability were concerned, fluoxetine might be the best choice.

摘要

目前有几种选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)类抗抑郁药用于治疗暴饮暴食症(BED),但这些抗抑郁药的疗效和可接受性仍存在争议。因此,我们设计了一项网状Meta分析(NMA),以比较不同SSRI类抗抑郁药治疗BED的疗效和可接受性。系统检索了包括PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science在内的四个数据库,以查找治疗BED患者的符合条件的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用Stata16软件进行分析。该NMA纳入了9项RCT。研究结果表明,与安慰剂相比,舍曲林和氟西汀可显著降低暴饮暴食的频率。氟西汀被证明是使汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分降低幅度最大的药物。此外,所有SSRI类抗抑郁药在减肥方面均无效。此外,就脱落率所反映的可接受性而言,所有被研究的抗抑郁药都具有良好的可接受性。就疗效和可接受性而言,氟西汀可能是最佳选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68f3/9486087/44e2a413bc07/fphar-13-949823-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68f3/9486087/48f1f7b3ae72/fphar-13-949823-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68f3/9486087/2ce9c990640b/fphar-13-949823-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68f3/9486087/44e2a413bc07/fphar-13-949823-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68f3/9486087/48f1f7b3ae72/fphar-13-949823-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68f3/9486087/2ce9c990640b/fphar-13-949823-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68f3/9486087/44e2a413bc07/fphar-13-949823-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants for binge eating disorder: A network meta-analysis.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂类抗抑郁药治疗暴饮暴食症的疗效及可接受性比较:一项网状Meta分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 6;13:949823. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.949823. eCollection 2022.
2
Proprietary Medicines Containing DC. (Chaihu) for Depression: Network Meta-Analysis and Network Pharmacology Prediction.含柴胡用于抑郁症的专利药物:网状Meta分析与网络药理学预测
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Apr 6;13:773537. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.773537. eCollection 2022.
3
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.21 种抗抑郁药治疗成人重度抑郁症的急性治疗的疗效和可接受性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2018 Apr 7;391(10128):1357-1366. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32802-7. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
4
Comparative efficacy, acceptability, and safety of medicinal, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and placebo treatments for acute major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis.药物治疗、认知行为疗法及安慰剂治疗对儿童和青少年急性重度抑郁症的疗效、可接受性及安全性比较:一项多治疗组元分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Jun;30(6):971-95. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.860020. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
5
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antidepressants, psychotherapies, and their combination for acute treatment of children and adolescents with depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药、心理治疗及其联合应用对儿童和青少年抑郁症急性治疗的比较疗效和可接受性:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jul;7(7):581-601. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30137-1.
6
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antidepressants and benzodiazepines for the treatment of panic disorder: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药和苯二氮䓬类药物治疗惊恐障碍的疗效及可接受性比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Asian J Psychiatr. 2021 Jun;60:102664. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102664. Epub 2021 May 3.
7
Individual Differences in Response to Antidepressants: A Meta-analysis of Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trials.抗抑郁药反应的个体差异:安慰剂对照随机临床试验的荟萃分析
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 1;77(6):607-617. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.4815.
8
9
10
Antidepressants for depression in patients with dementia: a review of the literature.用于治疗痴呆患者抑郁症的抗抑郁药:文献综述
Consult Pharm. 2014 Apr;29(4):254-63. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2014.254.

引用本文的文献

1
Antidepressant Non-refill as a Proxy Measure for Medication Acceptability in Electronic Health Records.电子健康记录中抗抑郁药未再取药作为药物可接受性的替代指标
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2025;45(4):310-319. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000002001. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
2
Pharmacological Treatment of Binge Eating Disorder and Frequent Comorbid Diseases.暴食障碍及常见共病的药物治疗。
CNS Drugs. 2024 Sep;38(9):697-718. doi: 10.1007/s40263-024-01111-1. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
3
Stress, psychiatric disease, and obesity: An Obesity Medicine Association (OMA) Clinical Practice Statement (CPS) 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Binge Eating Disorder in Children and Adolescents.儿童和青少年的暴饮暴食症
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2019 Oct;28(4):549-555. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
2
Reference checking for systematic reviews using Endnote.使用Endnote对系统评价进行参考文献核对。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Oct;106(4):542-546. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.489. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
3
Emotion Regulation in Binge Eating Disorder: A Review.暴食障碍中的情绪调节:综述。
压力、精神疾病与肥胖:肥胖医学协会(OMA)2022年临床实践声明(CPS)
Obes Pillars. 2022 Nov 4;4:100041. doi: 10.1016/j.obpill.2022.100041. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Children and Adolescents: Findings on Fluoxetine from the TDM-VIGIL Trial.儿童和青少年的治疗药物监测:TDM-VIGIL试验中氟西汀的研究结果。
Pharmaceutics. 2023 Aug 25;15(9):2202. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15092202.
5
Current Discoveries and Future Implications of Eating Disorders.进食障碍的最新发现及未来影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 8;20(14):6325. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20146325.
Nutrients. 2017 Nov 22;9(11):1274. doi: 10.3390/nu9111274.
4
Pharmacologic Treatments for Binge-Eating Disorder.暴食症的药物治疗。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2017;78 Suppl 1:14-19. doi: 10.4088/JCP.sh16003su1c.03.
5
Binge-Eating Disorder in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.成人暴食症:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Sep 20;165(6):409-20. doi: 10.7326/M15-2455. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
6
Binge-eating disorder diagnosis and treatment: a recap in front of DSM-5.暴饮暴食症的诊断与治疗:在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版之前的回顾
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Apr 3;15:70. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0445-6.
7
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.系统评价和荟萃分析议定书的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015:详细说明和解释。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
8
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
9
The prevalence and correlates of binge eating disorder in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys.在世界卫生组织的世界心理健康调查中,暴食症的流行情况及其相关因素。
Biol Psychiatry. 2013 May 1;73(9):904-14. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.11.020. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
10
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.Cochrane 协作网评估随机试验偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.