Burton Alex, Beveridge Sabeena, Hardcastle Nicholas, Lye Jessica, Sanagou Masoumeh, Franich Rick
Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS), Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA), Melbourne, Australia.
School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022 Sep 13;24:21-29. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.09.003. eCollection 2022 Oct.
A survey on the patterns of practice of respiratory motion management (MM) was distributed to 111 radiation therapy facilities to inform the development of an end-to-end dosimetry audit including respiratory motion.
The survey (distributed via REDCap) asked facilities to provide information specific to the combinations of MM techniques (breath-hold gating - BHG, internal target volume - ITV, free-breathing gating - FBG, mid-ventilation - MidV, tumour tracking - TT), sites treated (thorax, upper abdomen, lower abdomen), and fractionation regimes (conventional, stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy - SABR) used in their clinic.
The survey was completed by 78% of facilities, with 98% of respondents indicating that they used at least one form of MM. The ITV approach was common to all MM-users, used for thoracic treatments by 89% of respondents, and upper and lower abdominal treatments by 38%. BHG was the next most prevalent (41% of MM users), with applications in upper abdominal and thoracic treatment sites (28% vs 25% respectively), but minimal use in the lower abdomen (9%). FBG and TT were utilised sparingly (17%, 7% respectively), and MidV was not selected at all.
Two distinct treatment workflows (including use of motion limitation, imaging used for motion assessment, dose calculation, and image guidance procedures) were identified for the ITV and BHG MM techniques, to form the basis of the initial audit. Thoracic SABR with the ITV approach was common to nearly all respondents, while upper abdominal SABR using BHG stood out as more technically challenging. Other MM techniques were sparsely used, but may be considered for future audit development.
向111家放射治疗机构发放了一份关于呼吸运动管理(MM)实践模式的调查问卷,以推动包含呼吸运动的端到端剂量学审核的开展。
该调查问卷(通过REDCap发放)要求各机构提供有关其临床中使用的MM技术组合(屏气门控 - BHG、内靶区 - ITV、自由呼吸门控 - FBG、呼吸中期 - MidV、肿瘤追踪 - TT)、治疗部位(胸部、上腹部、下腹部)以及分割方案(传统分割、立体定向体部放射治疗 - SABR)的具体信息。
78%的机构完成了调查,98%的受访者表示他们至少使用了一种MM形式。ITV方法为所有MM使用者所常用,89%的受访者将其用于胸部治疗,38%用于上腹部和下腹部治疗。BHG是其次最常用的方法(41%的MM使用者),应用于上腹部和胸部治疗部位(分别为28%和25%),但在下腹部的使用极少(9%)。FBG和TT的使用较少(分别为17%、7%),MidV则完全未被选用。
针对ITV和BHG MM技术确定了两种不同的治疗工作流程(包括运动限制的使用、用于运动评估的成像、剂量计算以及图像引导程序),以此作为初始审核的基础。几乎所有受访者都常用ITV方法进行胸部SABR,而使用BHG的上腹部SABR在技术上更具挑战性。其他MM技术使用较少,但未来审核发展时可予以考虑。