• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测流域尺度农村社区洪水脆弱性和风险的时空变异性。

Predicting temporal and spatial variability in flood vulnerability and risk of rural communities at the watershed scale.

机构信息

Department of Watershed Management Engineering, College of Natural Resources and Marine Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor, 46414-356, Iran.

Department of Tourism Management, Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Iran.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2022 Dec 1;323:116261. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116261. Epub 2022 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116261
PMID:36150353
Abstract

Due to land-use and hydrology changes, people are constantly exposed to floods. The adverse impact of floods is greater on vulnerable populations that disproportionately inhabit flood-prone areas. This paper reports a comprehensive study on flood vulnerability of flood prone areas in residential areas of the Tajan watershed, Iran in two periods before 2006 and after 2006. Flood prone area were determined by the random forest (RF) and K-nearest neighbor (KNN) machine learning methods. To reduce time and cost, the vulnerability was assessed only in areas with very high flood hazard using 4 main criteria (social, policy, economic, infrastructure), 40 items, and 210 questionnaires across 40 villages. Independent t-test, Kruskal-Wallis, and paired t-test were used for statistical analysis of questionnaire data. The results of machine learning models (MLMs) showed that the RF model with AUC = 0.92% is more accurate in determining flood prone areas. The results of paired t-test showed that the three criteria of social (mean P1 = 2.97 and P2 = 3.35), infrastructure (mean P1 = 2.88 and P2 = 3.25), and policy (mean P1 = 3.02 and P2 = 3.50) had significant changes in both periods. The Kruskal-Wallis test also revealed the mean of all four criteria in both periods and all sub-watersheds, except three sub-watersheds 10 (Khalkhil village), 19 (Tellarem and Kerasp villages), and 23 (Dinehsar and Jafarabad), had a significant difference. The results of the t-test also showed a decrease in vulnerability in the second period (before 2006) compared to the first period (after 2006), so the number of sub-watersheds in the very high vulnerability class was more in the first period than in the second period. A vulnerability map was developed using three factors of risk zone area, area of each sub-watershed, and population of each sub-watershed.

摘要

由于土地利用和水文变化,人们不断面临洪水的威胁。洪水对居住在易受灾地区的弱势群体的不利影响更大。本文报告了对伊朗塔扬流域居民区易受灾地区洪水脆弱性的综合研究,研究时间为 2006 年之前和之后两个时期。易受灾地区是通过随机森林 (RF) 和 K-最近邻 (KNN) 机器学习方法确定的。为了减少时间和成本,仅在洪水高风险地区使用 4 个主要标准(社会、政策、经济、基础设施)、40 个项目和 40 个村庄的 210 份问卷评估脆弱性。独立 t 检验、克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验和配对 t 检验用于问卷调查数据的统计分析。机器学习模型 (MLM) 的结果表明,AUC=0.92%的 RF 模型在确定易受灾地区方面更准确。配对 t 检验的结果表明,社会(均值 P1=2.97 和 P2=3.35)、基础设施(均值 P1=2.88 和 P2=3.25)和政策(均值 P1=3.02 和 P2=3.50)三个标准在两个时期都有显著变化。克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验还显示,除了三个子流域 10(哈克希尔村)、19(泰勒雷姆和克拉萨村)和 23(迪内萨尔和贾法拉巴德)外,所有四个标准的平均值在两个时期和所有子流域都有显著差异。t 检验的结果还表明,与第一时期(2006 年之后)相比,第二时期(2006 年之前)脆弱性有所降低,因此,第一时期非常高脆弱性类别的子流域数量多于第二时期。利用风险区面积、每个子流域的面积和每个子流域的人口三个因素制作了一张脆弱性地图。

相似文献

1
Predicting temporal and spatial variability in flood vulnerability and risk of rural communities at the watershed scale.预测流域尺度农村社区洪水脆弱性和风险的时空变异性。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Dec 1;323:116261. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116261. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
2
Determination of flood probability and prioritization of sub-watersheds: A comparison of game theory to machine learning.洪水概率的确定和子流域的优先级划分:博弈论与机器学习的比较。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Oct 1;295:113040. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113040. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
3
A comparative study of morphometric, hydrologic, and semi-empirical methods for the prioritization of sub-watersheds against flash flood-induced landslides in a part of the Indian Himalayan Region.对印度喜马拉雅地区部分地区针对山洪诱发滑坡进行次流域优先排序的形态计量学、水文学和半经验方法的比较研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Sep;31(41):53796-53822. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30613-6. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
4
Towards a flood vulnerability assessment of watershed using integration of decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory, analytical network process, and fuzzy theories.利用决策试验与评价实验室、分析网络过程和模糊理论综合评估流域洪水脆弱性。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Nov;28(44):62487-62498. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14534-w. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
5
Flood susceptibility assessment of the Agartala Urban Watershed, India, using Machine Learning Algorithm.印度阿加尔塔拉城市流域洪水易感性评估,使用机器学习算法。
Environ Monit Assess. 2024 Jan 4;196(2):110. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-12240-3.
6
A novel flood risk mapping approach with machine learning considering geomorphic and socio-economic vulnerability dimensions.一种基于机器学习的新型洪水风险制图方法,考虑了地貌和社会经济脆弱性维度。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Dec 10;851(Pt 1):158002. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158002. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
7
Using algorithmic game theory to improve supervised machine learning: A novel applicability approach in flood susceptibility mapping.利用算法博弈论改进监督机器学习:洪水易感性制图中的一种新颖适用性方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Aug;31(40):52740-52757. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-34691-y. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
8
A new approach based on biology-inspired metaheuristic algorithms in combination with random forest to enhance the flood susceptibility mapping.基于生物学启发的元启发式算法与随机森林相结合的新方法,以提高洪水易感性制图的能力。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Nov 1;345:118790. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118790. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
9
Enhancing flood mapping through ensemble machine learning in the Gamasyab watershed, Western Iran.通过集合机器学习增强伊朗西部 Gamasyab 流域的洪水测绘。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Aug;31(38):50427-50442. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-34501-5. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
10
Mapping the spatial and temporal variability of flood hazard affected by climate and land-use changes in the future.未来气候和土地利用变化下洪水灾害风险的时空变化测绘。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Nov 15;298:113551. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113551. Epub 2021 Aug 17.