Health Effects Laboratory, Department for Environmental Chemistry, NILU - Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Kjeller, Norway.
Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Faculty of Biosciences, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès (Barcelona), Spain.
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2022 Oct;882:503545. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2022.503545. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
The potential genotoxicity of titanium dioxide (TiO) nanoparticles (NPs) is a conflictive topic because both positive and negative findings have been reported. To add clarity, we have carried out a study with two cell lines (V79-4 and A549) to evaluate the effects of TiO NPs (NM-101), with a diameter ranging from 15 to 60 nm, at concentrations 1-75 μg/cm. Using two different dispersion procedures, cell uptake was determined by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). Mutagenicity was evaluated using the Hprt gene mutation test, while genotoxicity was determined with the comet assay, detecting both DNA breaks and oxidized DNA bases (with formamidopyrimidine glycosylase - Fpg). Cell internalization, as determined by TEM, shows TiO NM-101 in cytoplasmic vesicles, as well as close to and inside the nucleus. Such internalization did not depend on the state of agglomeration, nor the dispersion used. In spite of such internalization, no cytotoxicity was detected in V79-4 cells (relative growth activity and plating efficiency assays) or in A549 cells (AlamarBlue assay) after exposure lasting for 24 h. However, a significant decrease in the relative growth activity was detected at longer exposure times (48 and 72 h) and at the highest concentration 75 µg/cm. When the modified enzyme-linked alkaline comet assay was performed on A549 cells, although no significant induction of DNA damage was detected, a positive concentration-effects relationship was observed (Spearman's correlation = 0.9, p 0.0001). Furthermore, no significant increase of DNA oxidized purine bases was observed. When the frequency of Hprt gene mutants was determined in V79-4 cells, no increase was observed in the exposed cells, relative to the unexposed cultures. Our general conclusion is that, under our experimental conditions, TiO NM-101 exposure does not exert mutagenic effects despite the evidence of NP uptake by V79-4 cells.
二氧化钛(TiO)纳米粒子(NPs)的潜在遗传毒性是一个有争议的话题,因为既有阳性结果也有阴性结果。为了澄清这一点,我们使用两种细胞系(V79-4 和 A549)进行了一项研究,以评估直径在 15 至 60nm 之间的 TiO NPs(NM-101)在 1 至 75μg/cm 的浓度下的影响。使用两种不同的分散程序,通过透射电子显微镜(TEM)确定细胞摄取量。使用 Hprt 基因突变试验评估致突变性,同时使用彗星试验检测 DNA 断裂和氧化的 DNA 碱基(使用 formamidopyrimidine glycosylase - Fpg)来确定遗传毒性。通过 TEM 确定的细胞内化显示 TiO NM-101 位于细胞质囊泡中,以及靠近和细胞核内。这种内化不依赖于团聚状态或使用的分散剂。尽管有这种内化,但在暴露 24 小时后,V79-4 细胞(相对生长活性和铺板效率测定)或 A549 细胞(AlamarBlue 测定)中均未检测到细胞毒性。然而,在更长的暴露时间(48 和 72 小时)和最高浓度 75µg/cm 时,相对生长活性显著下降。当在 A549 细胞上进行改良的酶联碱性彗星试验时,虽然未检测到 DNA 损伤的显著诱导,但观察到阳性浓度-效应关系(Spearman 相关系数=0.9,p<0.0001)。此外,未观察到 DNA 氧化嘌呤碱基的显著增加。当在 V79-4 细胞中确定 Hprt 基因突变体的频率时,与未暴露的培养物相比,暴露细胞中未观察到增加。我们的总体结论是,在我们的实验条件下,尽管有证据表明 V79-4 细胞摄取了 NP,但 TiO NM-101 暴露并未产生致突变作用。